Those of us who don't have the cash to spare for such a treasure
can use one of the many emulators.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Enigma+Machine+Emulator&btnG=Google+Search
On 7/19/07, Jefferson Kirkland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Everyone!
>
> Sorry for the severely OT post, but th
On Jul 19, 2007, at 14:18, Tom Buskey wrote:
> It would detect
> (mostly) track breaks and filter the pops, etc.
That got me to wondering what causes the pops, and some Googling
found that it's mostly dust, and some more Googling found this DIY
cleaning procedure:
http://www.djforums.com
On Jul 19, 2007, at 09:50, Neil Joseph Schelly wrote:
> Scheduling a nightly scan is
> relatively painless though and I think the performance benefit from
> not
> having the virus scanner constantly watching all disk activity is
> probably
> worth it.
In a world without ClamAV on your firewal
Charlie Farinella wrote:
> On Thursday 19 July 2007, Flaherty, Patrick wrote:
>>> Charlie volunteered to do a future presentation on digitizing
>> phonograph recordings
>>
>> Is this via IRENE (or IRENE like) software?
>
> I haven't heard of IRENE, I'll have to look into it.
>
> I've been record
On 7/19/07, Gary Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Subject: Re: (OT) Does anyone use FOSS Virus Scan?
> Add me to the list of ClamAV fans.
> I use ClamAV as part of the CopFilter add-on to the
> IPCOP distribution on a firewall. Since I've
> installed it I went from 2-3 hits a day from Norton
On 7/19/07, Charlie Farinella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 19 July 2007, Flaherty, Patrick wrote:
> > Charlie volunteered to do a future presentation on digitizing
> phonograph recordings
>
> Is this via IRENE (or IRENE like) software?
I haven't heard of IRENE, I'll have to look into
> Subject: Re: (OT) Does anyone use FOSS Virus Scan?
Add me to the list of ClamAV fans.
I use ClamAV as part of the CopFilter add-on to the
IPCOP distribution on a firewall. Since I've
installed it I went from 2-3 hits a day from Norton
Anti-virus to none.
IPCOP is an amazing distro btw - well
On Thursday 19 July 2007, Flaherty, Patrick wrote:
> > Charlie volunteered to do a future presentation on digitizing
> phonograph recordings
>
> Is this via IRENE (or IRENE like) software?
I haven't heard of IRENE, I'll have to look into it.
I've been recording to .wav with 'rec', and using Aud
>> Charlie volunteered to do a future presentation on digitizing
> phonograph recordings
>
> Is this via IRENE (or IRENE like) software?
As I was rushing around inside CostCo a few weeks back
I noticed turntables with USB interfaces, which I assume
means that digitization is (could be) handle
Flaherty, Patrick wrote:
>> Charlie volunteered to do a future presentation on digitizing
> phonograph recordings
>
> Is this via IRENE (or IRENE like) software?
>
>
Charlie briefly described what he's done. He's tried a bunch of
programs, none up to his standards. He's got a command-line tool
> Charlie volunteered to do a future presentation on digitizing
phonograph recordings
Is this via IRENE (or IRENE like) software?
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
Seven attendees made it to the July meeting of the Monadnock Area Linux
User Group, held as usual in the meeting rooms of SAU1 in Peterborough.
The meeting was advertised as open discussion and future topic planning,
and the group easily filled the two hours with discussion, references,
and ideas f
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:48:34 -0400
"Jefferson Kirkland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I am not sure
> of the genuine nature of the machine, but it is interesting to see
> this. If it is truly a real Enigma machine, then this is an
> incredible find for cryptography buffs.
There is guy at eve
Another vote for clamav, here. Use it on all the mail servers I run.
I've never used it on a desktop machine, but have manually scanned stuff
with it.
As mentioned earlier, there is a Windows version, too, called ClamWin.
It would also be useful to know how you intend to use it, because there
Summer doldrums?
Not for PySIG!
Next week has 4th Thursday in it, and 4th Thursday has
PySIG in it, at ABI. Agenda to follow, but we've lined
up our own Alex Hewitt to tell us about pexpect, and
what to expect when you're the first in your shop to
know about Python. (Hint: expect that folks wil
On Thursday 19 July 2007 08:54, Ben Scott wrote:
> On 7/19/07, Neil Joseph Schelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm looking for a 30-60GB hard drive to replace a failed drive in a Win98
> > box. Since Win98 doesn't like 64+GB drives ...
>
> I can't be sure (it's been awhile since I had to deal
On Thursday 19 July 2007 09:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> does anyone have experience with
> Open Source Virus Scan?
I use ClamAV on mail servers and deploy ClamWin to Windows users. The biggest
drawback and/or advantage to ClamWin is that it does not do on-access
scanning, like most of the co
On Thursday 19 July 2007 09:09:05 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello
>
> does anyone have experience with
> Open Source Virus Scan?
Yep, I run clamav on my mail server, scanning all incoming and outgoing mail.
Works quite well, highly recommended, etc., etc. Haven't used it in a desktop
setting
Hi Everyone!
Sorry for the severely OT post, but this is such a part of history that I
had to throw it up here for others to see. No, I am not sure of the genuine
nature of the machine, but it is interesting to see this. If it is truly a
real Enigma machine, then this is an incredible find for
I use Clamwin (in Windows) - there have been issues with slowness in the
Outlook plugin, I hear they're fixed now but I avoid Outlook so I'm no
longer sure. I have no idea if it's as good, better, or worse than the
commercial scanners, but I know it's better than nothing and that the
commercial o
Hello
does anyone have experience with
Open Source Virus Scan?
TIA
paulc
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
On 7/19/07, Neil Joseph Schelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a 30-60GB hard drive to replace a failed drive in a Win98 box.
> Since Win98 doesn't like 64+GB drives ...
I can't be sure (it's been awhile since I had to deal with Win98 in
any serious fashion), but I think it's just
Don't go nuts looking too hard, but if you do find any, let me know. I think
I'm covered already on this particular need, but I seem to require new hard
drives often, given the number of machines I have and the number of people
who come to me when theirs break.
-N
On Thursday 19 July 2007 07:2
I ought to have a couple of 40's or 60's around somewhere that worked fine
when I pulled them - if I can find them this weekend you can have them.
--DTVZ
On 7/19/07, Neil Joseph Schelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm looking for a 30-60GB hard drive to replace a failed drive in a Win98
box.
Si
I'm looking for a 30-60GB hard drive to replace a failed drive in a Win98 box.
Since Win98 doesn't like 64+GB drives and stores don't really stock too many
smaller ones these days, I'm looking for a drive in good shape that I can buy
from someone who may have a pile of them. Anyone?
-N
___
25 matches
Mail list logo