Ben Scott wrote:
A recent review[1] of the Asus Eee PC stated (paraphrased): Power
management on Linux sucks.
[1] http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/11/16/review_asus_eee_pc/print.html
Back when I looked into this (years ago), that was largely true.
During active use, Linux was more
When: November 21, 2007 7:00PM (6:30 for QA)
Topic: The Making of MythDora
Moderator: Jarod Wilson, Red Hat Software
Location: MIT Building E51 Room 315
Jarod discusses what went into creating MythDora 4, a simplfied MythTV
installation ISO image based on Fedora Core 6. Jarod also shows a live
2) Dell PowerEdge 2300. Beefy dual P3/600 server machine with 1.5GB
If this hasn't been spoken for I would love it and ca pick it up this weekend.
Mark
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
Ted Roche wrote:
LinkedIn has approved the group I set up for GNHLUG. If you're
interested in joining, you have to join LinkedIn first, then click on
this link:
http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/42315/32A73B64F8DC
FYI, for those who like to measure such things, we got 21 members in the
first
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 06:03:31PM -0500, Ben Scott wrote:
A recent review[1] of the Asus Eee PC stated (paraphrased): Power
management on Linux sucks.
I haven't read the review, but I agree with the statement that power
management on Linux sucks.
Turning off the CRT was about it. S3
On Nov 21, 2007 12:08 PM, mike ledoux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 06:03:31PM -0500, Ben Scott wrote:
[...]
I have yet to see suspend to RAM work on Linux anywhere.
[...]
I'm especially interested in how it fares for someone like me, who
prefers to run a traditional
On Nov 21, 2007, at 12:08, mike ledoux wrote:
I've had scripts to successfully 'hibernate' (suspend to disk)
my laptops for years, working at least as far back as 2.4-series
kernels. I have yet to see suspend to RAM work on Linux anywhere.
In some ways this is easier. As I understand it,
I really like the indoor batting facility in Salisbury, MA (Extra
Innings). I wondered how 'fast' the fast cage was. It seemed really
fast and has taken me a few visits to get to the point where I can hit
the ball. I asked today how fast the machine was. The friendly staff
person told me it
that is in the big leagues. I'm not making fun of the guy, but
physics isn't involved in solving the problem, just regular math.
Physics is just applied math. All the world is functions.
--
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Nov 21, 2007 5:51 PM, Greg Rundlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or, if I should be sad that an average person might think that
there is physics rather than math involved.
Physics was involved. Indeed, you just solved a physics problem.
The fact that you used math doesn't mean it wasn't a
On Nov 20, 2007 2:23 PM, Bill Sconce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Especially, my own thanks go out to the other members of the team,
Roseann and Mark. Thanks, guys!
And three cheers for Bill for being the heart and driving force behind it all!
[2a] (Shouldn't there be a kiosk in every public
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 17:51, Greg Rundlett wrote:
He said if I have some friends who know physics I could figure out
how fast that is in the big leagues. I'm not making fun of the guy,
but physics isn't involved in solving the problem, just regular math.
Actually, it is a physics
I just offer an interesting example of how math ain't that hard, and
can be used to solve fun problems. The basic question at hand was
How fast does the machine pitch? (compared to a major-league
pitcher). The basic answer could be found through some unit
conversion and cross multiplication. I
Greg Rundlett wrote:
Philosophically and sociologically, I'm asking why somebody who worked
there wouldn't solve these problems out of curiosity. Because they
don't know how? Because they don't care? Because they were
conditioned by social norms to believe the subject is too difficult or
14 matches
Mail list logo
