Alan Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Lloyd Kvam pyt...@venix.com
mailto:pyt...@venix.com wrote:
http://www.intermapper.com
is a local product that is worth considering.
I looked at Internapper years ago when I was running a Wireless ISP and
it looks very nice
Are there no Zenoss fans around here? I use Nagios myself, but thought
Zenoss looked pretty nice and was thinking about giving it a try...
--
Cole Tuininga
Lead Developer
co...@code-energy.com
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Kenny Lussier kluss...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
We are currently using Nagios for monitoring systems and some network gear.
However, we have found that it is a little lacking in a few areas:
Predictive threshold
SFlow tracking
Monitoring several sites from
Tom Buskey wrote:
Exposing the historical graphs to users is a good thing: they can see
the effect of doubling the number of developers on a system.
For historical system information and stats, I personally really like
munin. Nice and easy to set up, generates pretty graphs, extremely
On August 21, 2009, Tom Buskey sent me the following:
Personally, I'd take a well tuned Nagios for alerts and
something else for tracking historical data on graphs. I use
swatch with multitail to watch logfiles on multiple systems.
I've generally found Nagios to be very good for service
The last couple posts have reflected my experience as well. I use Nagios for
monitoring and alerting. I use Munin for graphing and visual representation
of things.
I'm currently upgrading from Nagios 2 to Nagios 3 and I admit I was kinda
hoping that I'd see more features in Nagios that would
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 14:30 -0400, Chip Marshall wrote:
On August 21, 2009, Tom Buskey sent me the following:
Personally, I'd take a well tuned Nagios for alerts and
something else for tracking historical data on graphs. I use
swatch with multitail to watch logfiles on multiple systems.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Chip Marshall c...@2bithacker.net wrote:
OpenNMS looks interesting to me, I think I'll have to try it out
sometime when I get spare cycles...
There is significant overhead in the initial OpenNMS setup, not unlike HP
Open view, but not quite as bad because