The switches are called for.
Dan
Dan Miller wrote:
> I have 2 Dell PowerConnects 3048.
> http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/network/2T180/
>
> 48 port managed 10/100 switches
> 2 10/100/1000 ports
>
> Rack ears are screwed on currently.
>
> I have been told, both are fully working and were
Ben Scott writes:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Tom Buskey wrote:
> > And RAIDs should be scrubbed periodically.
>
> Modern RAID controllers usually feature something called "patrol
> read", which reads all the blocks on the physical disks in the
> background, when otherwise idle.
>
> I
I have 2 Dell PowerConnects 3048.
http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/network/2T180/
48 port managed 10/100 switches
2 10/100/1000 ports
Rack ears are screwed on currently.
I have been told, both are fully working and were replaced when we moved
offices.
Dan
__
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Thomas Charron wrote:
>> It really suprised me that I couldn't find this information in the
>> /proc fs anywhere.
> What do you think this is, MS Windows? :) We've got a perfectly
> servicable tool (dumpe2fs)
On 10/06/2009 10:19 AM, Alex Hewitt wrote:
> Thanks Ken, Dave and Ben for the answers and thoughtful analysis. I
> currently have essentially one large partition for Linux and another
> large partition for Vista. I think when I set up my next system I'm
> going to make the granularity of the fil
On October 06, 2009, Michael ODonnell sent me the following:
>
> Gr!! A long-standing source of frustration for me is that people who
> definitely should know better insist on writing code that utters only
> "pretty" outputs instead of useful, parseable info. Yes, it's darling
> and precious
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Michael ODonnell <
michael.odonn...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> Gr!! A long-standing source of frustration for me is that people who
> definitely should know better insist on writing code that utters only
> "pretty" outputs instead of useful, parseable info. Ye
> Modern RAID controllers usually feature something called "patrol
>read", which reads all the blocks on the physical disks in the
>background, when otherwise idle.
>
> Is there a similar feature in Linux's RAID implementation?
As of 2005 when I was obliged to write scrubber code along the lin
>> No need to stick it in /proc, but parsing the output of utilities with
>> scripts is subject to all kinds of potential errors and inefficiencies.
>
> If that's your concern, the utility should have an output mode
>that's more friendly to machine interpretation. :)
Gr!! A long-standin
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Bill McGonigle
> wrote:
> > On 10/06/2009 12:33 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
> >> Manch-Vegas is centrally located amongst most of NH's population
> >> centers (sorry, Bill!)
> >
> > Just to be pedantic, "and the other
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> My Ubuntu 8.10 system uses EXT3 for the root filesystem and will
> automatically fschk the volume every 35 mounts.
> >>
> > Someday soon, Linux will have btrfs. I don't think it does/needs fsck.
> > And ZFS doesn't fsck either.
>
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> On 10/06/2009 12:33 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
>> Manch-Vegas is centrally located amongst most of NH's population
>> centers (sorry, Bill!)
>
> Just to be pedantic, "and the other 108 members of DLSLUG".
Clearly what is needed here is *two* pa
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> No need to stick it in /proc, but parsing the output of utilities with
> scripts is subject to all kinds of potential errors and inefficiencies.
If that's your concern, the utility should have an output mode
that's more friendly to machin
On 10/06/2009 10:42 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
> What do you think this is, MS Windows? :) We've got a perfectly
> servicable tool (dumpe2fs) that will tell us the information. Why do
> we need a kernel API for it? :)
No need to stick it in /proc, but parsing the output of utilities with
scripts i
On 10/06/2009 12:33 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
> Somewhere in Manchester, perhaps --
> Manch-Vegas is centrally located amongst most of NH's population
> centers (sorry, Bill!)
Just to be pedantic, "and the other 108 members of DLSLUG". But a party
is just a party and I don't have geolocation on the DL
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Tom Buskey wrote:
> And RAIDs should be scrubbed periodically.
Modern RAID controllers usually feature something called "patrol
read", which reads all the blocks on the physical disks in the
background, when otherwise idle.
Is there a similar feature in Linux
http://doodle.com/ysxe3gm9cdf3rdi5
Very obvious how to use it.
Doodle isn't perfect, but it's really good for finding the best date/time.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Seth Cohn wrote:
>> I suggest a doodle.com vote to see who can make when.
My Ubuntu 8.10 system uses EXT3 for the root filesystem and will
automatically fschk the volume every 35 mounts.
>>
> Someday soon, Linux will have btrfs. I don't think it does/needs fsck.
> And ZFS doesn't fsck either.
I can't vouch for ZFS, but btrfs most certainly does have both on-l
>I also think it would be neat to have the gathering on the anniversary
>date.
Well, to throw a little gasoline into the discussion:
o The date you mention is the date of the first meeting of
what-would-become the GNHLUG meeting. I still remember sitting around a
few weeks later trying to discus
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Alex Hewitt wrote:
> Ben Scott wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Alex Hewitt
> wrote:
> >
> >> My Ubuntu 8.10 system uses EXT3 for the root filesystem and will
> >> automatically fschk the volume every 35 mounts.
>
Someday soon, Linux will have btrfs. I
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Thomas Charron wrote:
> It really suprised me that I couldn't find this information in the
> /proc fs anywhere.
What do you think this is, MS Windows? :) We've got a perfectly
servicable tool (dumpe2fs) that will tell us the information. Why do
we need a ker
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Alex Hewitt wrote:
> I think when I set up my next system I'm going to make
> the granularity of the file systems finer by dividing up
> the mount points/partitions.
I should probabbly mention that when I wrote "partition" I actually
meant "logical volume". I u
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Alex Hewitt wrote:
> My Ubuntu 8.10 system uses EXT3 for the root filesystem and will
> automatically fschk the volume every 35 mounts. I haven't been able to
> find out where the mount count is stored or how that data can be
> retrieved. I don't want to change the
Ben Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Alex Hewitt wrote:
>
>> My Ubuntu 8.10 system uses EXT3 for the root filesystem and will
>> automatically fschk the volume every 35 mounts.
>>
>
> I see the question's been answered, but here's some general commentary,
> FWIW.
>
> I g
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Alex Hewitt wrote:
> My Ubuntu 8.10 system uses EXT3 for the root filesystem and will
> automatically fschk the volume every 35 mounts.
I see the question's been answered, but here's some general commentary, FWIW.
I generally find it's more appropriate to use
Well, I'll be with you in spirit, and will lift a frosty mug that evening
to celebrate. I'm currently spending the summer in Hendersonville, NC,
where we have a second home, and run openSUSE 11.1 on the second hard drive
on my HP dv9000z laptop. I also have a 320GB USB drive with F11, openSUSE 11.2
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 07:34, Ben Scott wrote:
> Well, while your presence would definitely be appreciated/missed, I
> also think it would be neat to have the gathering on the anniversary
> date. What do others think?
I eat eat every day (so far) and any excuse for a party is a good
ex
Alex Hewitt writes:
> My Ubuntu 8.10 system uses EXT3 for the root filesystem and will
> automatically fschk the volume every 35 mounts. I haven't been able to
> find out where the mount count is stored or how that data can be
> retrieved. I don't want to change the automated fschk but I'd like
tune2fs -l /dev/sda1 | grep -i "mount count"
(Where /dev/sda1 is the presumed partition.)
-Ken
P.S. Insert creative ramblings here about how btrfs will allow on-line
fsck's, include per-file checksums, and wash your dishes.
On Tue, October 6, 2009 8:35 am, Alex Hewitt wrote:
> My Ubuntu 8.10
My Ubuntu 8.10 system uses EXT3 for the root filesystem and will
automatically fschk the volume every 35 mounts. I haven't been able to
find out where the mount count is stored or how that data can be
retrieved. I don't want to change the automated fschk but I'd like to
display the count so I
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> On 10/05/2009 12:36 PM, Tom Buskey wrote:
> >
> > Apple hasn't been as free with their hardware in the past (the 68k
> > systems) and the iPod/IPhone are in that group, but the x86 systems have
> > been fairly open to different OSen and soft
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Seth Cohn wrote:
> I suggest a doodle.com vote to see who can make when...
Set it up and post the link. And if it's not obvious, explain how
to use it. :)
This is a group effort. :)
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mail
I suggest a doodle.com vote to see who can make when...
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Jon 'maddog' Hall wrote:
>> I will be in Brazil from October 12th to the morning of October 26th.
>
> Well, while your presence would definitely be apprecia
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Jon 'maddog' Hall wrote:
> I will be in Brazil from October 12th to the morning of October 26th.
Well, while your presence would definitely be appreciated/missed, I
also think it would be neat to have the gathering on the anniversary
date. What do others think?
I've got my grandmother coming up to see the leaves (and me) sometime in the
next few weeks but we could probably work around it for such a worthy cause.
As long as the place serves picky eaters like me* I'll be there.
* if( ! $bluemoon ) { s/veggies/starch/g ; cat /etc/fish > /dev/null }
-- Micha
Ben,
I will be in Brazil from October 12th to the morning of October 26th.
I could participate one week later than the 19th, or on the evening of
October 11th, one week and a day early.
md
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
> `Open Systems FTW'?
>
> So..., I just recently heard about these guys:
>
> http://www.system76.com/
>
> Anyone here have experience with, or opinions of, them?
>
Nope.
But I do have (intimate you might say) experience with a *local*
provider of Linux sy
37 matches
Mail list logo
