>You will be hard pressed to find an off-the-shelf OSS product that works
well
> for videoconferencing.
I agree - I worked for a company that produced video/web-conferncing
software. BTW - The server side is called an MCU (multipoint control
unit).
Our MCU was multi-platform (windows, linux and
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:13:26 -0400 Gerry Hull wrote
> I did some more searching... It seems that lots of people are doing video
> conferencing with Freeswitch Here''s some documentation:
>
http://wiki.projectdiastar.org/index.php/FreeSWITCH/Woomera_User_Guide#Video_Conferencing
Ah, yes. Proj
I did some more searching... It seems that lots of people are doing video
conferencing with Freeswitch
Here''s some documentation:
http://wiki.projectdiastar.org/index.php/FreeSWITCH/Woomera_User_Guide#Video_Conferencing
Freeswitch is at http://www.freeswitch.org.
As long as you have the pip
"Ken D'Ambrosio" writes:
>
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:02:01 -0400 Ben Scott wrote
>
> > Please clarify "server side". Do you mean you're looking for
> > recommendations on central server software to coordinate traditional
> > video conferencing client software, or do you mean you're looking for
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Joshua Judson Rosen
wrote:
>> XMPP is presence and text-oriented messages, not streaming video.
>> SIP does session set-up and tear-down.
>
> Actually, XMPP does do streaming video; I don't believe it was
> part of the core protcol spec, but it did come in later v
Ben Scott writes:
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Joshua Judson Rosen
> wrote:
> >>> If I say "Jabber/XMPP", "SIP", or "H.232"; or "Ekiga", "Pidgin",
> >>> "Empathy",
> >>> or "Jitsi"..., does it mean that I've misunderstood the question?
> >>
> >> I expect so, given that at least a coup
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:02:01 -0400 Ben Scott wrote
> Please clarify "server side". Do you mean you're looking for
> recommendations on central server software to coordinate traditional
> video conferencing client software, or do you mean you're looking for
> something that hides the client in
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> But the piece he's missing -- which I implied
> but didn't state, so it's kinda my fault -- are the words "server side."
Please clarify "server side". Do you mean you're looking for
recommendations on central server software to coordina
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Joshua Judson Rosen
wrote:
>>> If I say "Jabber/XMPP", "SIP", or "H.232"; or "Ekiga", "Pidgin", "Empathy",
>>> or "Jitsi"..., does it mean that I've misunderstood the question?
>>
>> I expect so, given that at least a couple of those are not video
>> conferencin
"Ken D'Ambrosio" writes:
>
> > >> Hey, guys. I've been tasked with bringing a video conferencing solution
> > >
> > > If I say "Jabber/XMPP", "SIP", or "H.232"; or "Ekiga", "Pidgin",
> > > "Empathy",
> > > or "Jitsi"..., does it mean that I've misunderstood the question?
> >
> > I expect so,
Those are either clients or, protocols -- I presume you meant H323, not
232...
You will be hard pressed to find an off-the-shelf OSS product that works
well for videoconferencing.
Vmukti was around for a while, but they seem to have gone commercial.
Freeswitch is an awesome softswitch. The swit
Ben Scott writes:
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Joshua Judson Rosen
> wrote:
> >> Hey, guys. I've been tasked with bringing a video conferencing solution
> >
> > If I say "Jabber/XMPP", "SIP", or "H.232"; or "Ekiga", "Pidgin", "Empathy",
> > or "Jitsi"..., does it mean that I've misunder
> >> Hey, guys. I've been tasked with bringing a video conferencing solution
> >
> > If I say "Jabber/XMPP", "SIP", or "H.232"; or "Ekiga", "Pidgin", "Empathy",
> > or "Jitsi"..., does it mean that I've misunderstood the question?
>
> I expect so, given that at least a couple of those are not v
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Joshua Judson Rosen
wrote:
>> Hey, guys. I've been tasked with bringing a video conferencing solution
>
> If I say "Jabber/XMPP", "SIP", or "H.232"; or "Ekiga", "Pidgin", "Empathy",
> or "Jitsi"..., does it mean that I've misunderstood the question?
I expect s
"Ken D'Ambrosio" writes:
>
> Hey, guys. I've been tasked with bringing a video conferencing solution
> in-house, by strong preference Open Source (for both philosophical as well as
> financial reasons).
[...]
> I'm completely open-minded as to an OSS solution so long as:
>
> - It's not overly har
On 07/26/2012 03:33 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> Hey, guys. I've been tasked with bringing a video conferencing solution
> in-house, by strong preference Open Source (for both philosophical as well as
> financial reasons). I've found a couple of promising candidates (e.g., check
> out Openmeetings
16 matches
Mail list logo
