On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 09:15:13PM -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
> On 3/27/07, Mark E. Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Oh, and back to a previous subject... simply changing the subject text
> >isn't really enough. When a threat mutates, you really want a new one,
> >which means getting rid of the
On 3/27/07, Ric Werme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the technical side, one problem with this list is that it's infeasible
for digest recipients to reply to a thread and preserve the thread
history ...
Switching your settings from "plain text" to a MIME digest will
solve this problem for you (
On 3/27/07, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/27/07, Jeffry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not just arguing to be argumentative (that's room 12A)
>
> Isn't that room 3b?
No it's not!
On behalf of the barrister firm of Leach, Cleese and Bartlett, please
stop this silliness b
During and immediately after the Sept 11 attacks, the US Air Traffic
Control system was faced with an unprecedented challenge: Respond to a
concerted effort to use passenger airliners as flying bombs, while at
the same time grounding all civilian air traffic. This had never been
done before. Th
If anybody is tallying votes, my vote is:
1: don't split the mailing list.
2: encourage members of this list to stay on topic in the way that we
always have.
3: treat members like adults
4: expect members to be adults
If you have been on this list for any amount of time and you have
On 3/27/07, Mark E. Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh, and back to a previous subject... simply changing the subject text
isn't really enough. When a threat mutates, you really want a new one,
which means getting rid of the "References" links.
Hmmm. Interesting take. I've always found t
On 3/27/07, Jeffry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not just arguing to be argumentative (that's room 12A)
Isn't that room 3b?
No it's not!
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/l
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:45:49PM -0400, mike ledoux wrote:
>
> I have been through this a few times in the past, with different
> groups, where the decision was eventually made to fragment the list
> into multiple lists with more focused charters. I have, to date,
> never seen it work well. Wi
Drew Van Zandt profferred his $0.02:
> If a couple of guys are posting something you're tired of hearing about on
> the list, and you don't want to do some sort of filtering to drop
> it... send all those discussing it on list an OFF-LIST polite note "Isn't
> that sort of offtopic? The chatter's
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:52:01AM -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
> I'm not just arguing to be argumentative (that's room 12A); these
> are questions that would need to be answered for anything like a list
> charter to be drawn up.
Isn't that room 3b?
jeff
_
That's the strongest argument I've heard against splitting. Thank you for
changing my opinion.
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgment :-)
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlu
My $0.02:
If a couple of guys are posting something you're tired of hearing about on
the list, and you don't want to do some sort of filtering to drop it... send
all those discussing it on list an OFF-LIST polite note "Isn't that sort of
offtopic? The chatter's drowning out the Linux talk."
I do
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:52:01AM -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
[...]
> I'm not just arguing to be argumentative (that's room 12A); these
> are questions that would need to be answered for anything like a list
> charter to be drawn up.
>
> >... (and then ignore them later with the proper subject line)
13 matches
Mail list logo
