Re: GPG Question

2007-02-15 Thread Ben Scott
On 2/15/07, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... they'd rather not have the employees explicitly aware that the employer could read their e-mail ... This may be preaching to the choir, but... Be aware that such a policy (not telling employees of snooping) is outright illegal in some

Re: GPG Question

2007-02-15 Thread Bill McGonigle
On Feb 15, 2007, at 11:28, Ben Scott wrote: Be aware that such a policy (not telling employees of snooping) is outright illegal in some jurisdictions, and is a legal minefield in others. Or so I'm told. Yeah, it's amazing what some people don't care about. I left when it was decided that

GPG Question

2007-02-14 Thread Ed Lawson
After the talk at this month's Centlug meeting on GPG, I have be trying to delve into how to use PGP. I have three computers that are used for both personal and business use and on each I login as the same user for both purposes. The question is how to use PGP in a way that provides a

Re: GPG Question

2007-02-14 Thread Paul Lussier
Ed Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: After the talk at this month's Centlug meeting on GPG, I have be trying to delve into how to use PGP. I have three computers that are used for both personal and business use and on each I login as the same user for both purposes. The question is how to

Re: GPG Question

2007-02-14 Thread Bill McGonigle
On Feb 14, 2007, at 11:22, Ed Lawson wrote: The question is how to use PGP in a way that provides a separation between personal and business use. In other words, how do you set up PGP so that business mail is signed/encrypted so that business folks can verify/decrypt business mail, but