On Monday 23 January 2006 15:29, Bill Sconce wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:51:23 -0500
Bill Sconce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's what I've found out so far. I spoke with Representative
Cataldo, one of the bill's sponsors.
Indeed, the meetings are public.
Often the chairman will make a
On Thursday 19 January 2006 12:18, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
A bit more information:
...
According to Rep. Allan, the committee has thus far been favorable
towards the use of open source, but wants to ensure that there is a plan
in place beyond Fix it yourself in the situation that there is a
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:51:23 -0500
Bill Sconce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's what I've found out so far. I spoke with Representative
Cataldo, one of the bill's sponsors.
Indeed, the meetings are public.
Often the chairman will make a specific invitation for members of
the public to offer
Original message
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:20, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On Jan 17, 2006, at 23:28, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
Not sure if I'll be going, but I'm thinking about it.
(I'm also not 100% sure if it's open to the public,
but am 95% sure on it.)
If others are interested,
message
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:31:36 -0500
From: Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HB1197 Public Meeting
To: Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Christopher Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED], GNHLUG
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill
I was talking to my father-in-law-to-be this past weekend, and
mentioned the bill in the house on Open Source. He mentioned (and
invited me to attend) the following public subcommittee work session:
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/hcaljourns/calendars/2006/houcal2006_6.html
Tuesday, Jan 24th:
On Jan 17, 2006, at 23:28, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
Not sure if I'll be going, but I'm thinking about it. (I'm also not
100%
sure if it's open to the public, but am 95% sure on it.) If others are
interested, I can confirm details.
Would this be purely as a spectator sport? In other words,
