Ben Scott writes:
> On 3/25/07, David A. Long wrote:
> > Has anyone looked into mini PCI (type III) crypto cards, or otherwise
> > made modifications to the WRT54GL hardware? The radio hardware in the
> > box is on its own removable mini PCI card and presumably could be
> > replaced with a crypt
On Mar 25, 2007, at 16:25, Ben Scott wrote:
You'd have to find one of the old
WRT54G v1 units to get a mPCI slot. I think.
There are other brands that run the *WRT line. One that comes to
mind is Asus's WL-500g, which has a Mini-PCI radio:
http://www.asus.com/products4.aspx?
modelmen
On 3/25/07, David A. Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone looked into mini PCI (type III) crypto cards, or otherwise
made modifications to the WRT54GL hardware? The radio hardware in the
box is on its own removable mini PCI card and presumably could be
replaced with a crypto card.
Inter
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 21:33 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2007, at 16:28, Ben Scott wrote:
> > There are some LinkSys bitty boxes which supposedly have crypto
> > accelerators in them, and some of them are listed on the OpenWRT
> > pages, but I don't know if the crypto hardware is suppor
On Mar 12, 2007, at 16:28, Ben Scott wrote:
On 3/12/07, Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And it made me cry, watching how pitiful the throughput was
when using an ipsec vpn client running on the wrt. :)
Ouch. Yah, it's like a 200 MHz CPU, and it's optimized for
low-power, not perform
Ben Scott wrote:
> On 3/12/07, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> But would non-owners be getting bored with all this purple-and-black
>> stuff?
>
> Tsk. They're clearly blue. ;-)
>
I was only allowed the 8 big fat crayons in school, so I don't know what
you call it. I've referred the
On 3/12/07, Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And it made me cry, watching how pitiful the throughput was
when using an ipsec vpn client running on the wrt. :)
Ouch. Yah, it's like a 200 MHz CPU, and it's optimized for
low-power, not performance. I'm surprised it's even usable.
There
tsk... obviously they're Linksys-colored.
--DTVZ
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
Ben Scott wrote:
> On 3/12/07, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> But would non-owners be getting bored with all this purple-and-black
>> stuff?
>
> Tsk. They're clearly blue. ;-)
>
I was only allowed the 8 big fat crayons in school, so I don't know what
you call it. I've referred the
On Monday 12 March 2007 11:21:18 Ben Scott wrote:
> On 3/12/07, Drew Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just wanted to change the *(@#$&^)%# subnet mask on the box to
> > 255.255.0.0 instead of being limited to their list.
>
> 24 bits of netmask should be enough for anyone. ;-)
>
> > hyp
I was far lazier than that - I put a line in my startup script doing
an appropriate ifconfig.
--DTVZ
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 10:57 -0400, Drew Van Zandt wrote:
> I just wanted to change the *(@#$&^)%# subnet mask on the box to
> 255.255.0.0 instead of being limited to their list.
If you feel like using ssh to connect to the box, I would expect
nvram show | grep -i mask
to show something li
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 16:19 -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I was asked off-list about my experience with OpenWRT. I asked if
> an on-list message was okay, and it was. So:
>
> I have a LinkSys WRT54G, Hardware Version 2, at home. As many know,
> these boxes run Linux internall
On Mar 12, 2007, at 08:44, Ted Roche wrote:
I enjoyed Lloyd's talk about DD-WRT and the ethernet bridging he
had done.
IIRC Lloyd was also using OpenWRT.
Sounds like we almost have enough topics for a WRT54G users group!
Oh, no, not per-distro user groups! :)
-Bill
-
Bill McGonigle,
On 3/12/07, Drew Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just wanted to change the *(@#$&^)%# subnet mask on the box to
255.255.0.0 instead of being limited to their list.
24 bits of netmask should be enough for anyone. ;-)
hyperWRT ... doesn't appear to have SNMP support
... I'd like t
I just wanted to change the *(@#$&^)%# subnet mask on the box to
255.255.0.0 instead of being limited to their list. I'll be switching
from hyperWRT soon, though, since it doesn't appear to have SNMP
support and I'd like to monitor per-port bandwidth. I believe several
of the others will do that
On 3/12/07, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/12/07, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Boy, that sounds like it could be a pretty good presentation.
If people are interested, I would be happy to re-load the stock
firmware and then demonstrate the process "live". (Yah, a live dem
On 3/12/07, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Boy, that sounds like it could be a pretty good presentation.
If people are interested, I would be happy to re-load the stock
firmware and then demonstrate the process "live". (Yah, a live demo
-- I'm crazy that way.)
But would non-owners be
On Mar 11, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
Hi everybody!
I was asked off-list about my experience with OpenWRT. I asked if
an on-list message was okay, and it was. So:
Boy, that sounds like it could be a pretty good presentation. I
enjoyed Lloyd's talk about DD-WRT and the ethernet
Hi everybody!
I was asked off-list about my experience with OpenWRT. I asked if
an on-list message was okay, and it was. So:
I have a LinkSys WRT54G, Hardware Version 2, at home. As many know,
these boxes run Linux internally, and third-party firmware has been
developed to greatly extend th
20 matches
Mail list logo
