Sure. Tell me how NH residents like myself are supposed to track
down a
criminal in Russia sending stuff from a zombie box in Korea and using
a PO Box in Mexico.
Why would this be your job? All I'm saying is that no one is even
willing to entertain the reports. As far as I can tell
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:53:12AM -0400, Hewitt Tech wrote:
I guess what puzzles me is that spam is almost always used on behalf of
someone who is trying to get customers. It's those companies that should get
burned. If spam is tracked back to them, and I don't see why it's
particularly hard
Jeff Kinz writes:
When I find them (I get almost no spam at all these days), I sometimes
follow the trail back to the original company's website, track down the
hosting company, and send the spam with an explanation that the company
is violating the AUP to abuse@isp/hosting compay.
I find
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Kinz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Greater NH Linux User Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: BitTorrent and Comcast?
.
.
its a bit like asking a police officer, exactly how many MPH over
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, at 3:36pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The scammers should be tracked down one by one and made to face the
courts.
Sure. Tell me how NH residents like myself are supposed to track down a
criminal in Russia sending stuff from a zombie box in Korea and using a PO
Box in
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:10:10PM -0400, Benjamin Scott wrote:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, at 3:36pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The scammers should be tracked down one by one and made to face the
courts.
Sure. Tell me how NH residents like myself are supposed to track down a
criminal in
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Greater NH Linux User Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: BitTorrent and Comcast?
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, at 3:36pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The scammers should be tracked down
On Sep 27, 2004, at 16:05, Bill Freeman wrote:
What probably matters is whether their network monitoring people watch
for, notice, and object to, the kind of activity that BitTorrent
generates.
Right - good luck pinning them down on it too - they allegedly like to
change the rules to suit their
I've used BitTorrent to grab all the latest Linux ISOs (and to serve
them back, of course) for a while now, and haven't heard any
threatening noises from Comcast. Otoh, a friend got a warning letter
from the MPAA for the movies he was apparently downloading. Remember,
BT is not anonymous P2P
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 16:32, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On Sep 27, 2004, at 16:05, Bill Freeman wrote:
What probably matters is whether their network monitoring people watch
for, notice, and object to, the kind of activity that BitTorrent
generates.
Right - good luck pinning them down on it
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 16:05, Bill Freeman wrote:
Does anyone know whether Comcast considers using BitTorrent as
a client to be a terms of service violation (because each client also
serves)? I can't get a straight answer out of Comcast customer
support. They just quote the sections of
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, at 4:05pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know whether Comcast considers using BitTorrent as a client to
be a terms of service violation (because each client also serves)?
When an ISP's ToS refer to running servers, they generally mean hosting
services. They don't
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 08:52:15PM -0400, Benjamin Scott wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, at 4:05pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know whether Comcast considers using BitTorrent as a client to
be a terms of service violation (because each client also serves)?
I can't
On May 20, 2004, at 3:34 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
From: Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 20, 2004 3:20:41 PM EDT
To: GNHLUG Mail Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bittorrent Fedora Core 2 MD5 failures?
Head's up to anyone considering using bittorrent to download FC2. After 48 hours of happy
On Thu, 20 May 2004, at 3:34pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone got suggestions for an ISO repair kit? Or am I SOL?
If the MD5 checksum does not match, it means the CD image you have does
not match the one that Red Hat/Fedora released. This most likely means one
or more of the files on the CD
Good afternoon, Ted,
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Ted Roche wrote:
Head's up to anyone considering using bittorrent to download FC2.
After 48 hours of happy up- and down-loading, I have disks 1 - 4
failing the MD5 test, although the rescue disk appears to be okay g.
I was hoping that it
I have to agree.. BitTorrent is GREAT. That's how I got my RH9 ISOs and it
is very fast.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Macdonald
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 9:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BitTorrent
Hi,
Trying to download
17 matches
Mail list logo
