Re: Mail, PIMs, CRMs and not Windows :)

2004-02-01 Thread Derek Martin
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:07:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll check it out. Though I'm having trouble convincing people that Macs are good and Windows is bad because of the learning curve... Learning curve represents a one-time, relatively fixed period of productivity loss. Windows

Re: Mail, PIMs, CRMs and not Windows :)

2004-01-27 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:55:37 EST Brian Riley (maillist) said: I personally haven't tried it, but it would be interested to know if the IMAP problems in Mail.app from Jaguar (10.2.x) persist in Mail.app under Panther (10.3.x), they did quite an overhaul on it, almost enough to

Re: Mail, PIMs, CRMs and not Windows :)

2004-01-26 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:36:02 EST Travis Roy said: Just an FYI, Entourage is not that close to Outlook. Office X is actually a totally seperate code base (as is IE for the Mac). Entourage is actually closer to Outlook XP as far as how it looks, but they're still not quiet the

Re: Mail, PIMs, CRMs and not Windows :)

2004-01-26 Thread Brian Riley (maillist)
I must concur about the whole office V.X suite on OSX ... I know some guys of the development team and it is a whole separate code base. In many ways the Mac office suite is 'ahead' of the windows code base. Mant features appear in Office Mac then show up the following year in office XP ... I

RE: Mail, PIMs, CRMs and not Windows :)

2004-01-21 Thread Travis Roy
Along that same front, the business users here have been using Office X for Mac OS, which means they've been using Entourage (the Mac name for Outlook) as their PIM/Mail client. This means that we have all the stupidity of Outlook on the Mac. Just an FYI, Entourage is not that close to