Re: SPAM and procmail

2004-01-15 Thread Jeff Macdonald
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 15:37, Chris wrote: You're likely to see more of this. It's an attempt to bypass bayesian style mail filters. I'm not using one yet, so I don't know how successful this tactic is. Irregardless, I'm still of the opinion that spammers are lower life forms than even

Re: SPAM and procmail

2004-01-15 Thread Jeff Macdonald
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 10:46, Jeff Macdonald wrote: On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 15:37, Chris wrote: You're likely to see more of this. It's an attempt to bypass bayesian style mail filters. I'm not using one yet, so I don't know how successful this tactic is. Irregardless, I'm still of

Re: SPAM and procmail

2004-01-14 Thread Matt Brodeur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 06:41:49AM -0500, Brian wrote: For anyone interested... It seems that a lot of spam is starting to slip through Spam Assassin again. The majority of the messages seem to either have obvious subject lines, or have ALT--

RE: SPAM and procmail

2004-01-14 Thread brian
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 08:04, Travis Roy wrote: I noticed that too, then I looked at the headers: X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring Since I saw no use for anything Habeas would send me, I just made a rule to block stuff with those headers in it as well :) I have only (so far) gotten a

RE: SPAM and procmail

2004-01-14 Thread Travis Roy
I noticed that too, then I looked at the headers: X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in

RE: SPAM and procmail

2004-01-14 Thread Travis Roy
I see no chance of Habeas actually suing someone over copyright infringement and/or having any net effect. Except according to their website, they have, and they won. ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SPAM and procmail

2004-01-14 Thread brian
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 08:11, Travis Roy wrote: I see no chance of Habeas actually suing someone over copyright infringement and/or having any net effect. Except according to their website, they have, and they won. One case (at least from what I saw), and it's still a HUGE delay loop:

Re: SPAM and procmail

2004-01-14 Thread Brian Chabot
Brian wrote: For anyone interested... It seems that a lot of spam is starting to slip through Spam Assassin again. I've had some pretty good luck using a combination of server and client spam filters. On the server side I've been using Spam Bouncer www.spambouncer.org and since it came out

Re: SPAM and procmail

2004-01-14 Thread brian
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 11:30, Brian Chabot wrote: Brian wrote: For anyone interested... It seems that a lot of spam is starting to slip through Spam Assassin again. I've had some pretty good luck using a combination of server and client spam filters. I like to do all my

Re: SPAM and procmail

2004-01-14 Thread Chris
Brian Chabot wrote: Brian wrote: For anyone interested... It seems that a lot of spam is starting to slip through Spam Assassin again. I've had some pretty good luck using a combination of server and client spam filters. On the server side I've been using Spam Bouncer

Re: SPAM and procmail

2004-01-14 Thread Cole Tuininga
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 12:37, Chris wrote: Lately I have noticed that the spammers are using random word generators in both the subject and sometimes in the From: Here are a couple of examples Subject perfidious behemoth doused o pk okbct rhy lc n bevel emancipate aerobacter

Re: SPAM and procmail

2004-01-14 Thread Chris
Cole Tuininga wrote: On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 12:37, Chris wrote: Lately I have noticed that the spammers are using random word generators in both the subject and sometimes in the From: Here are a couple of examples Subject perfidious behemoth doused o pk okbct rhy lc n