Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-25 Thread James R. Van Zandt
"Ben Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: MythTV... Asterisk... You ought to take a look at Linuxmce: http://www.linuxmce.com - Jim Van Zandt ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnh

Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-23 Thread Bill Mullen
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:21:43 -0400 "Jon 'maddog' Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Or are you looking for things that don't exist yet (or I/we're not aware > > of)? > > > A little of both. FOSS products and services (commercial or > non-commercial) that exist today that just do something grea

Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-23 Thread Ted Roche
On Mar 21, 2007, at 11:20 PM, Jon 'maddog' Hall wrote: Recently I was working on a project, and I ran across this article: [Warning: Explicative language involved] Big fan and daily reader of both Tim Bray and Hugh McLeod's "Gaping Void" - warning, some language there not appropriate for so

Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-22 Thread aluminumsulfate
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin D. Clark) > Date: 22 Mar 2007 15:14:31 -0400 > aluminumsulfate writes: > > > It's like LISP only well thought out and actually useful. > > I for one find your enthusiasm for Lojban and your dislike of LISP to > be pretty amusing. > > --kevin (who finds LISP to

Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-22 Thread Kevin D. Clark
aluminumsulfate writes: > It's like LISP only well thought out and actually useful. I for one find your enthusiasm for Lojban and your dislike of LISP to be pretty amusing. --kevin (who finds LISP to be beautiful...) -- GnuPG ID: B280F24E Never could stand that dog. alumni.unh.ed

Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-22 Thread aluminumsulfate
> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:20:19 -0400 > From: "Jon 'maddog' Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > So what do *YOU* think would be F***king cool? > > md Mathematica also pretty much fits that description. I once read The Mathematica Book (describing the language) and was THOROUGHLY impressed. It's like

Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-22 Thread Tom Buskey
On 3/22/07, Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Tom Buskey wrote: > Something that could run my house, measuring and regulating everything. > > Sensors to measure temp/humidity everywhere and graph them > energy use > Electric usage per outlet/socket > Hot water/hot air/cold air > Burgler al

Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-22 Thread aluminumsulfate
> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:20:19 -0400 > From: "Jon 'maddog' Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > So what do *YOU* think would be F***king cool? > > md Being able to operate/program/configure a computer soley by speaking Lojban to it would kickgrass! http://www.lojban.org (Hi, Tucker!) Maybe something

Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-22 Thread Bill Sconce
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:13:06 -0400 "Ben Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you'd told me five years ago that a globally writable text file > would one of most useful sites on the web, I'd have thought you > were insane. Then it's fortunate md/I/we didn't tell you that. [explicative deleted

Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-22 Thread Bruce Dawson
Tom Buskey wrote: Something that could run my house, measuring and regulating everything. Sensors to measure temp/humidity everywhere and graph them energy use Electric usage per outlet/socket Hot water/hot air/cold air Burgler alarm Christmas/walkway/driveway lights Driveway sensors Active heat

RE: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-22 Thread Paul Tykodi
Tom Buskey wrote: > Something that could run my house, measuring and regulating everything. > > Sensors to measure temp/humidity everywhere and graph them > energy use > Electric usage per outlet/socket > Hot water/hot air/cold air > Burgler alarm > Christmas/walkway/driveway lights > Driveway se

Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-22 Thread Bayard Coolidge
Jon 'maddog' Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So what do *YOU* think would be F***king cool? md Being able to run my entire ham shack (2 multi-band transceivers, one of which is ~12-15 years old but does have a computer interface) including the antenna rotor, during a contest using voice, morse cod

Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-22 Thread Kent Johnson
Jon 'maddog' Hall wrote: A little of both. FOSS products and services (commercial or non-commercial) that exist today that just do something great. Or unique ways of doing things that "rocks your boat" (www.plutohome.com) Django (a Python web framework) is f***ing amazing. It blows my mind ho

Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-22 Thread Tom Buskey
Something that could run my house, measuring and regulating everything. Sensors to measure temp/humidity everywhere and graph them energy use Electric usage per outlet/socket Hot water/hot air/cold air Burgler alarm Christmas/walkway/driveway lights Driveway sensors Active heating vents Adjust te

Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-22 Thread Jon 'maddog' Hall
> > Or are you looking for things that don't exist yet (or I/we're not aware > of)? > A little of both. FOSS products and services (commercial or non-commercial) that exist today that just do something great. Or unique ways of doing things that "rocks your boat" (www.plutohome.com) Maybe some

Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-22 Thread Bruce Dawson
Jon 'maddog' Hall wrote: > So what do *YOU* think would be F***king cool? > All those things you mentioned plus: * Servers that use12 watts of power and do everything my servers that consumed 300 watts did 2 years ago, and more (koolu, ...) * Pay your bills without using stamps (DCU Bill

Re: Warning: Explicative language involved

2007-03-21 Thread Ben Scott
On 3/21/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [Explicative Language] Cool? Is that a deliberate pun? :-) ("Explicative" != "expletive") In the field of computers, or the application of computers what would really get you going? In order of decreasing practicality and increasi