On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Kenny Lussier wrote:
> So, using shell commands is now a sign of illegal activity...
> http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/boston-college-prompt-commands-are-suspicious
According to the always-reliable Slashdot comments , EFF is
taking the warrant statements ra
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Kenny Lussier wrote:
> So, using shell commands is now a sign of illegal activity...
>
>
>
> http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/boston-college-prompt-commands-are-suspicious
>
> “…uses two different operating systems to hide his illegal activities.
> One is a re
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Tom Buskey wrote:
> I'm more bothered that the witness said "regular BC operating system"
> instead of Windows..
Well, sadly, that's a fair description of Microsoft Windows. It
*does* have the vast majority of the market share.
As someone on Slashdot pointed
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
> The reason the guy was arrested ...
Correction: The suspect was not arrested. It was a property
seizure, not an arrest.
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:01:05 -0400
Ben Scott wrote:
> [The officer] left a
> Property Receipt with [the suspect] listing items seized during the
> search ... The seized post-it note does not appear on that
> receipt.".. But when an accused can't even make
> notes for use in their own defens
> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:08:46 -0400
> From: Ed lawson
> Cc: Greater NH Linux User Group
> believe police officers increasingly feel empowered to take very suspect
> if not unlawful actions simply by reason of their position of authority
> and for their self interest.
Speaking from personal
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Kenny Lussier wrote:
> So, using shell commands is now a sign of illegal activity...
> http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/boston-college-prompt-commands-are-suspicious
> “…uses two different operating systems to hide his illegal activities.
> One is a regular B.C
It's only suspicious if he was using EMACS, everyone knows vi is the One
True Editor.
2009/4/16 Thomas Charron
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Kenny Lussier wrote:
> > So, using shell commands is now a sign of illegal activity...
> >
> http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/boston-college-pr
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:31:43 GMT
virgins...@vfemail.net wrote:
> But (while on the topic) there's one safe place that anyone can stash
> something even with no technical skills at all: a lawyer's office.
> Anything you give to your lawyer is protected by attorney-client
> privilege. No crypto re
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Curtis Sandoval
wrote:
>
> It's only suspicious if he was using EMACS, everyone knows vi is the One
> True Editor.
>
I dunno. I mean, really, a hardcore emacs user would have
customized their UI to provide color syntax highlighting. And the
SPECIAl color for
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:31 PM, wrote:
> ... we can encrypt anything that might be incriminating ...
http://xkcd.com/538/
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
Kenny Lussier wrote:
> So, using shell commands is now a sign of illegal activity...
>
>
stirring the pot with a follow-up, the EFF reports:
* A JUDGE HAS ORDERED POLICE TO RETURN A LAPTOP AND OTHER
PROPERTY SEIZED FROM A BOSTON COLLEGE COMPUTER SCIENCE
STUDENT'S DORM ROOM after finding there
12 matches
Mail list logo
