<holy war> It's only suspicious if he was using EMACS, everyone knows vi is the One True Editor. </holy war>
2009/4/16 Thomas Charron <twaf...@gmail.com> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Kenny Lussier <kluss...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So, using shell commands is now a sign of illegal activity... > > > http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/boston-college-prompt-commands-are-suspicious > > “…uses two different operating systems to hide his illegal activities. > > One is a regular B.C operating system and the other is a black screen > > with white font which he uses prompt commands on.” > > Not knowing what type of computers we're talking about here, it > appears as if what *makes* the activity suspicios was the use of that > system. The EFF argument is based on taking one line of text out of a > MUCH larger document, and presenting as the the entire document. > > Typical 'Ub/||-| hAc<3rz' types DO typically present their linux > systems as being some sort of super-secret underground superplatform. > I'm assuming based on the overall descriptions of this guy that it was > presented this way. I can hear the ghosts of idiots from the past, > "Yea, look at this. I'm running Linux, because I'm part of the elite > crowd, and we're all different'. > > Sure, I'm stereotyping him, but after the evidence which BC > presented to the cop.. Well, I can't imagine what the guys like when > he gets his kick from sending ananymous emails to a group of people > saying, "Hey everyone, I'm GAY!". > > -- > -- Thomas > > _______________________________________________ > gnhlug-discuss mailing list > gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org > http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/ >
_______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
