On Sep 9, 2004, at 14:32, Brian Riley (maillist) wrote:
When I want to download a big ISO, I get 140-150 MB in
the morning, then the next 140-150 in the afternoon and so on using a
download manager that lets me stop and cleanly restart.
You could also do:
curl --limit-rate 6K -C - -O http://foo.exa
Oh yes, there are some real dirtbags on both Dish and Direct internet
services ... I was lucky I found a local dealer in Milton, VT who was a real
pleasure to work with.
On 9/9/04 11:32 AM, "Bill McGonigle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Plus the local Direcway licensees were scum, trying to get
The latency will kill you for fast twitch gaming. No question about it.
All in all DSL or cable is a better deal. Satellite is really for us guys
who live where the cable/phone guys don't want to spend the money on the
infrastructure and the local towns don''t have the balls to stand up to them
a
Ooppps that was $100 up front and $100/mo versus $600 upfront and $60 a
month - same service, just one way is financing the equipment and
installation.
On 9/9/04 10:37 AM, "Paul Lussier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a message dated: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 23:01:27 EDT
> "Brian Riley (maillist)" sai
NO, what there is is called "Fair Access Policy', implemented in software.
Iwhat it comes down to is you can average 22 MB every hour for ever. You
start off with a 167 MB credit (more for commercial packages which cost more
bucks) and can draw against that as fast as you want, but that hastens the
On Sep 9, 2004, at 10:37, Paul Lussier wrote:
Did the $4100/$100/$60 get you a higher
quality of service?
FYI, he meant $100, not $4100 (lack of a shift key on the 4). They
basically let you pay for equipment over time at a total of ~$100
extra. High interest rate, but easier to swallow for man
On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 10:37 -0400, Paul Lussier wrote:
> In a message dated: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 23:01:27 EDT
> "Brian Riley (maillist)" said:
>
> >My download speeds are on the order of cable speeds and upload is slower but
> >At least as good as most DSL.
>
> What's the latency like on that? I'm
In a message dated: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 23:01:27 EDT
"Brian Riley (maillist)" said:
>My download speeds are on the order of cable speeds and upload is slower but
>At least as good as most DSL.
What's the latency like on that? I'm assuming with a 48K mile
round-trip minimum for every packet, latency
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 23:01:27 -0400
"Brian Riley (maillist)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have had Direcway bi-directional satellite since April and am fairly
> happy with it.
Isn't there a daily download limit of 500 or 800 MB?
--
Jerry Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Boston Linux and Unix user
f
>> Jeff Macdonald
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 2:57 PM
>> To: Bill McGonigle
>> Cc: GNHLUG Discussion
>> Subject: Re: Verizon offering 3Mbps
>>
>> On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:24:07 -0400, Bill McGonigle
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>
On Sep 1, 2004, at 14:57, Jeff Macdonald wrote:
I believe that the 3Mbps doesn't work with the remote terminals. Got
any URLs? I was wonder what that was all about.
I found this:
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11201302~mode=flat
which seems to indicate the backhaul to the DSLAM governs the
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 15:20:10 -0400, Sharpe, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone tried Satellite ? Dish or Direct-Way ?
Works great, but the latency is kinda harsh..
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mai
tener fe" ("We must have faith")
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jeff Macdonald
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 2:57 PM
> To: Bill McGonigle
> Cc: GNHLUG Discussion
> Subject: Re: Veriz
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:24:07 -0400, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today I was reading about DSL out of 'remote terminals'. I guess they
> can put a DSLAM in the neighborhood boxes that fiber optics land at.
>
I believe that the 3Mbps doesn't work with the remote terminals. Got
any U
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 2:01pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> HB495 didn't get passed .. but it basically said that if somebody has
> their access point open that they did it like that on purpose.
Uhh... if it didn't get passed then it does not matter *what* the bill
said. A bill has precisely zero
I've got Adelphia due to lack of availability of DSL here (and the
cable modem winds up in a swamp with a couple wireless hops to get it
here) and it's mostly been good (5 minute reboot time on their DHCP
server after a power outage though, I think they need a UPS).
I'm 6.5 miles from the CO.
T
You could always find somebody with adelphia and an open access point
and mooch off them. HB495 didn't get passed (passed in the house, died
on the table in the senate) but it basically said that if somebody has
their access point open that they did it like that on purpose.
I wish I could get
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 7:50am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I wish I could get it, but not in my part of Merrimack, I would need
> Adelphia and I will not use them.
I'd rather have Adelphia then dial-up. Yah, Adelphia sucks, but when it
comes to ISPs, Sturgeon's Law is overly optimistic.
--
Ben
I wish I could get it, but not in my part of Merrimack, I would need
Adelphia and I will not use them.
Richard A Sharpe
(DBA) Sqlserver/DB2
Amherst Technologies
40 Continental Blvd
Merrimack, NH 03054
PHONE ...(603) 579-6180 / (800) 431-8031
Cell phone ..(603) 320-7785
FAX ...(603) 57
I have been very happy with my ADSL service from MV Communications. Sure
I had issues when I first got it hooked up (due to Verizon being stupid,
not MV) but since then it's been great.
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, at 10:06pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/53311
http://ars
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, at 10:06pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/53311
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=19980609
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=19980610
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=19980611
;-)
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The
21 matches
Mail list logo