Re: Time (was: GIMP 2.0 Release Party?)

2004-04-17 Thread p . lussier
In a message dated: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 23:29:39 EDT Michael ODonnell said: Paul Lussier wrote: Yet this isn't the first time someone has been nonplussed by a less-then-instantaneous response. Can one be 'plussed' ? Um, isn't that your email address? Touche ;) Seeya, Paul -- Key fingerprint =

Time (was: GIMP 2.0 Release Party?)

2004-04-16 Thread bscott
2On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, at 1:55pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been hard at work getting my presentation put together ... On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, at 12:43pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a little dismayed that there has been zero response to my message about GIMP 2.0 And you waited a whole 23

Re: Time (was: GIMP 2.0 Release Party?)

2004-04-16 Thread p . lussier
In a message dated: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 18:28:42 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 2On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, at 1:55pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been hard at work getting my presentation put together ... On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, at 12:43pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a little dismayed that there has

Re: Time (was: GIMP 2.0 Release Party?)

2004-04-16 Thread Michael ODonnell
Paul Lussier wrote: Yet this isn't the first time someone has been nonplussed by a less-then-instantaneous response. Can one be 'plussed' ? Um, isn't that your email address? ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]