Re: httpd lineage [Was: The new 'Linux Foundation']

2007-02-08 Thread Neil Joseph Schelly
On Thursday 08 February 2007 12:49 pm, Michael ODonnell wrote: > > Debian's attempts to do everything the "right" way, otherwise > > known as the "Debian" way, regardless of how others have done it > > I don't know that be generally true. I'm not sayin' it ain't > so, just that I'm not aware of it

Re: httpd lineage [Was: The new 'Linux Foundation']

2007-02-08 Thread Michael ODonnell
> Debian's attempts to do everything the "right" way, otherwise > known as the "Debian" way, regardless of how others have done it I don't know that be generally true. I'm not sayin' it ain't so, just that I'm not aware of it. Care to elaborate? or were you just painting with too broad a brus

Re: httpd lineage [Was: The new 'Linux Foundation']

2007-02-08 Thread Neil Joseph Schelly
On Thursday 08 February 2007 12:24 pm, Bill McGonigle wrote: > So, in redhat-land capabilities and package names and binary names > are separate things - am I correct in inferring that in debian > they're more integrated? Package names and binary names are generally more similar in Debian I guess,

Re: httpd lineage [Was: The new 'Linux Foundation']

2007-02-07 Thread Christopher Schmidt
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 06:16:18PM -0500, Bill McGonigle wrote: > On Feb 7, 2007, at 13:20, Neil Joseph Schelly wrote: > > >I think that was a Debian-based vs. RedHat-based distro joke/ > >reference. > > Over my head, I'm sure. :) > > >Debian packages of Apache call it apache. > > In the proce

Re: httpd lineage [Was: The new 'Linux Foundation']

2007-02-07 Thread Bill McGonigle
On Feb 7, 2007, at 13:20, Neil Joseph Schelly wrote: I think that was a Debian-based vs. RedHat-based distro joke/ reference. Over my head, I'm sure. :) Debian packages of Apache call it apache. In the process list or package name? Paul was talking 'ps'. I guess you could modify the ap

Re: httpd lineage [Was: The new 'Linux Foundation']

2007-02-07 Thread Neil Joseph Schelly
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 12:44 pm, Bill McGonigle wrote: > It's always been spelled 'httpd'. I seem to remember UIUC installing > I used to be able to 'ps ax | grep apache' because of pathing - with > Redhat's in /usr/sbin/httpd you can't do that anymore - maybe that's > what you're recallin

httpd lineage [Was: The new 'Linux Foundation']

2007-02-07 Thread Bill McGonigle
On Feb 7, 2007, at 10:22, Paul Lussier wrote: Didn't RedHat spell it 'httpd' at one point? It's always been spelled 'httpd'. I seem to remember UIUC installing theirs in /usr/local/etc/httpd . Over the years most of mine lived at /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd until it got modular and Redha