On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Michael ODonnell
wrote:
> Subject: de-ComCastification test
Do you get this reply?
If so, your de-Comcastification didn't work completely. I'm sending
from Comcast.
;-)
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Michael ODonnell
wrote:
>
> Pardon the noise - just verifying that I can post
> to the GNHLUG list using my non-ComCast email address..
Seems to have worked. :^)
--
The secret of happiness is freedom,
and the secret of freedom is courage.
- Thucydides
_
Pardon the noise - just verifying that I can post
to the GNHLUG list using my non-ComCast email address..
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 06:36:24PM -0500, Ben Scott wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Bruce Labitt
> wrote:
> > Are there any decent tools or scripts that one can use?
>
> I've had SmokePing recommended to me for this purpose.
Seconded. If you have a machine running 24/7, it produces ve
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Bruce Labitt
wrote:
> Are there any decent tools or scripts that one can use?
I've had SmokePing recommended to me for this purpose.
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnh
The new year brings upgraded connectivity. :) Naturally I'd like to
test my connection to see if I'm getting what I paid for. I've tried
some the tools at dslreports and received some strange results.
http://www.dslreports.com/pingtest/7ab34aa36277/2861823?r=64
pingtest.ne
ave
in Montreal last year), so maybe we can schedule doing it at one or
more of the GNHLUG meetings if any folks are interested.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
> Interesting account of how an add-on for FireFox claiming to be a
> security test included a backdoor that capt
Interesting account of how an add-on for FireFox claiming to be a
security test included a backdoor that captured usernames & passwords.
If you've recently download "Mozilla Sniffer" you'll want to pay
particular attention to this article:
http://news.netcraft.com/arc
On Jul 17, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Michael ODonnell wrote:
> Anybody have any experience with the Phoronix test suite?
>
> http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/
>
> I've seen some praise for it on the WWW but so far my impression is
> not good. I've pulled both the 2.
Anybody have any experience with the Phoronix test suite?
http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/
I've seen some praise for it on the WWW but so far my impression is
not good. I've pulled both the 2.0.0b2 and the 1.8.1 tarballs (they also
offer a .deb but no RPM) onto a fairl
On Jun 9, 2008, at 16:58, Ben Scott wrote:
> The above seems like it has nothing to do with the usual reasons
> people give for subscribing to this list. It also seems likely to be
> the sort of topic that blows up into a long, drawn-out, boring
> discussion, which the vast majority of the 300
[ DISCLAIMER: In the following, I speak only for myself. This
message reflects my personal opinion, not that of the GNHLUG Board of
Directors. This message does not constitute list policy, nor a
judgment from the topic police. In fact, this message is so
unofficial, I'm starting to question my
C'mon Bill, if you can't trust Microsoft to keep your data secure who CAN
you trust?
In all seriousness, banks have been sharing financial data with "secure
third parties" for online banking for a long time. Very few have in-house
online banking services, and most use Microsoft software to do it
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0630718920080609
Kaiser to test linking health records to Microsoft
Mon Jun 9, 2008 10:50am EDT
By Deena Beasley
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Kaiser Permanente, the biggest health maintenance
organization in the United States, announced a pilot
On 10/1/07, Flaherty, Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> FYI, the correct operator is = and == is an extension of bash. ==
>> should not be used.
>
> I thought everything in those brackets was just an argument to test.
It is. Sort of. Except that /usr/bin/test --
On 10/1/07, Jeffry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/1/07, Tom Buskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Here's the relevant bash (3.2.9) man page on Fedora 7:
> >
> >
> > string == pattern
> > True, if string matches pattern. Any part of pattern
> can
> > be
> >
On 10/1/07, Tom Buskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here's the relevant bash (3.2.9) man page on Fedora 7:
>
>
> string == pattern
> True, if string matches pattern. Any part of pattern can
> be
> quoted to cause it to be matched as a string. With a
> succ
and == is an extension of bash. ==
> should
> > not be used.
> >
>
> I thought everything in those brackets was just an argument to test. The
> = or == shouldn't be dependant on your shell, but on your coreutils
> version.
>
> However, I tested it.
> [E
and-aid, by the way, was that "=" instead of "==" works.
> =>(And how ugly is THAT? And how do you explain that to a student?)
>
> FYI, the correct operator is = and == is an extension of bash. ==
should
> not be used.
>
I thought everything in those brackets was ju
are all the right bits in place?
--
Jeff Macdonald
Ayer, MA
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XML parse error in line 2:
<pong payload="test message..">
Malformed XML: Entity not closed.
Sorry, couldn't resist. :)
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://ma
> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:29:32 -0500
> From: John Feole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
test message..
JFeole
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
A day without GNHLUG messages is like a day without... well, never mind.
Just testing the list.
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailm
Does this get posted?
I have been trying to send the merrilug meeting notice to
gnhlug-discuss all day. I never get through. This is to check if a
spam filter is snagging it.
Jim Kuzdrall
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlu
Or responding with snarky and witty repartee, as your conscience
guides you.
I'm switching my subscription from @tedroche.com to @comcast.net as
the service I've been using for email forwarding has taken up to
fourteen days to forward a message. Worked fine for four+ years.
Makes it hard
On Feb 8, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
Me too. If this isn't fixed in a few days, I'll report it.
No need. Lars wrote back to say he fixed it. Tests okay now.
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
___
gnhlug-discuss mai
Okey-doke. Forwarded the problem onto Lars, after reading the FAQ.
Twice.
On Feb 8, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Travis Roy wrote:
I had the same issue.
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@ma
Me too. If this isn't fixed in a few days, I'll report it.
Better use the anon tip line, or a gang of broken images might come to
beat you up.
I'm tired, leave me alone :)
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlu
Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Went there, clicked on the top message, coincidentally from
> me. Clicked on the top line (the From: me) and got a page "Gmame -
> Decrypted Address" but the image link was broken. The HTML read:
Me too. If this isn't fixed in a few days, I'll report it
I had the same issue.
On Feb 8, 2005, at 2:57 PM, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
This would be a good place to look at these:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.linux.gnhlug
Went there, clicked on the top message, coincidentally from me. Clicked
on the top line (the From: me) and got a page
On Feb 8, 2005, at 2:57 PM, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
This would be a good place to look at these:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.linux.gnhlug
Went there, clicked on the top message, coincidentally from me. Clicked
on the top line (the From: me) and got a page "Gmame - Decrypted
A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin D. Clark) writes:
> I have subscribed gnhlug-discuss to Gmane (http://gmane.org/).
Archives of this group are now available in the following location
under the Gmane hierarchy:
gmane.org.user-groups.linux.gnhlug
This would be a good place to look at these:
I have subscribed gnhlug-discuss to Gmane (http://gmane.org/).
I am just sending this mail in order to see what Gmane does with it.
--kevin
--
GnuPG ID: B280F24E And the madness of the crowd
alumni.unh.edu!kdc Is an epileptic fit
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 15:10, Scott Garman wrote:
> Here's a silly question:
>
> Is there a command or byte sequence I can extract from an ISO or CD-ROM
> to test if it is bootable without actually trying to boot from it?
> Overall I'm also curious exactly what it is
These sites are keepers in their own right,
and will very likely have your answers, or
at least point you in the right direction:
http://www.cdrfaq.org/faq.html
http://www.phoenix.com/resources/specs-cdrom.pdf
( http://www.phoenix.com/en/customer+services/white+papers-specs/ )
_
Here's a silly question:
Is there a command or byte sequence I can extract from an ISO or CD-ROM
to test if it is bootable without actually trying to boot from it?
Overall I'm also curious exactly what it is that makes a bootable CD
bootable.
Scott
--
Scott Garman
sgarman at ina
A debate on Windows vs. FOSS security does have to take into account the
applications being run on the operating system. I rarely hear anyone
mention that in these discussions. A secure OS does little good if the
applications require security to be overridden for them to operate.
Regularly I en
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, at 1:01pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Yes, but this has nothing to do with the design or implementation of
>> either Linux/Unix or MS-Windows. It's simply a matter of operator
>> mindset.
>
> Er, I can't say I agree there either. Until very recently, Microsoft
> provided no
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 10:24:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I disagree, and I'm surprised to hear you say that. It's true that FOSS
> > does have many buffer overflows, but even when they are attacked, the
> > Linux/Unix model is inherently more secure. The fact that under most
> > cir
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, at 11:46am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Actually, no. While there certainly is malware in the wild that does
>> target specific exposures like that, a good deal does not.
>
> I disagree, and I'm surprised to hear you say that. It's true that FOSS
> does have many buffer over
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 08:33:29PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Isn't it true that most of the malware that's plaguing the Net either
> > relies heavily on all the mis-features (like automatic blind execution of
> > content) added to the various Microsoft applications in the name of
> > "con
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, at 1:45pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> This took me 25 minutes,
>>
>> I hope your boss isn't reading this list ;)
>
> This is funny, because he is reading the list..
I did it on my lunch break. Nyah, nyah. ;-)
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed i
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, at 1:45pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> This is going to happen; it is only a question of when.
>
> Although I (think I) get Ben's general point it seems to me that there
> haven't yet been enough VPLs ported to Linux to facilitate the
> creation/spread of any truly virulent ma
>> This is going to happen; it is only a question of when.
>
> Considering this list is public, archived, and searchable via
> Google, I now give it a week or two until someone sees this and
> combines it with perl's MIME::Lite and Email::Simple modules ;)
Although I (think I) get Ben's genera
>
> In a message dated: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:27:39 EST
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
>> This took me 25 minutes,
>
> I hope your boss isn't reading this list ;)
This is funny, because he is reading the list..
(BTW Tom, this only took 2 minutes)
___
gnhlug
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:34:37PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, at 10:52am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> It is worth pointing out that, like most such malware, the MyDoom worm
> >> forges the "From" address.
> >
> > SPF would prevent a lot of this from happening, strange
In a message dated: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:27:39 EST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> This took me 25 minutes,
I hope your boss isn't reading this list ;)
> This is going to happen; it is only a question of when.
Considering this list is public, archived, and searchable via Google,
I now give it a wee
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, at 10:52am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> It is worth pointing out that, like most such malware, the MyDoom worm
>> forges the "From" address.
>
> SPF would prevent a lot of this from happening, strangely enough.
True, but then the malware will just switch back to using the
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, at 10:52am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> The reason this is significant is that there is absolutely no technical
>> reason that this worm could not exist in the Macintosh or Unix worlds.
>
> For now I think it would be technically hard for this to happen.
#!/bin/sh
# MyDoom fo
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 10:33:50AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 16:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available.
>
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, at 11:04pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is this the MyDoom worm/virus?
>
> Yup.
>
>
> On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 16:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available.
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, at 11:04pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is this the MyDoom worm/virus?
Yup.
It is worth pointing out that, like most such malware, the MyDoom worm
forges the
Is this the MyDoom worm/virus?
On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 16:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available.
--
Jeff Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
My birding blog: http://www.virtualbuilder.com/archives/cat_birding.html
Into birding? Visit http://www.migratus.com
Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available.
<>
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Pretty much what everyone else has said so far makes good sense to me.
To paraphrase:
1) Do a nmap from outside your firewall to see what's open.
2) Even with dialup, you still need some kind of network protection.
(After all, PPP, actually puts your machine on the 'net with its own,
albeit tem
Larry Cook wrote:
Now that I've moved to DSL, I was looking for ways to test the security
of my router/firewall. I'm going to use ShieldsUp! (http://grc.com),
but was wondering what other tools were available.
Tom's recommendation of having a friend poke your perimeter is prob
Now that I've moved to DSL, I was looking for ways to test the security of my
router/firewall. I'm going to use ShieldsUp! (http://grc.com), but was
wondering what other tools were available.
When using a dialup connection, I felt pretty safe because of the seperation
of my netwo
Thanks for the responses. I feel much better after having done some testing
over the weekend.
The various test sites show that my Actiontec DSL modem/router responds that
the ports are closed, although a few ports don't respond at all. These are
ports 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 412, an
Larry Cook wrote:
Now that I've moved to DSL, I was looking for ways to test the security
of my router/firewall. I'm going to use ShieldsUp! (http://grc.com),
but was wondering what other tools were available.
Get a friend to do an nmap of your site to see what's open. Unplug
Sorry for the noise...
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Stupid [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ email...
Sorry for the noise.
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Title: Test Message
It appears I'm getting duplicates of messages sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
This is just a test.
-Lawrence
OTECTED]'
subscription working?
Thanks for your assistance.
Greg
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: IGNORE test
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 02:12:17 -0500
From: Greg Rundlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Greater NH LUG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for some reas
This is a test message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] My previous messages to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] are timing out from the Postfix program
zcamail03.zca.compaq.com, and I don't know why.
--
Bob Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is a test to [EMAIL PROTECTED] My previous messages
are timing out from the Postfix program zcamail03.zca.compaq.com, and
I don't know why.
--
Bob Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
"Suppose I want to tak
Sorry to waste bandwidth -- just a quick test to see how mutt handles
lists/subscribe combinations.
--
Bob Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
In a message dated: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 15:45:39 EDT
Michael O'Donnell said:
>Yah, that's what I thought at first, too, but
>the headers in this msg are formatted exactly
>the same as the ones in the failing msgs - do
>you see anything that looks b0rken?
No. It could be mailman being a p.i.t.a.
Sorry for the noise - !@#$%!!! email problems...
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
69 matches
Mail list logo
