Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 17:07 +0200, Gudmund Areskoug wrote:
Got any better ideas for graphics/icon?
Yes, flags are better. They are less controversial than maps
I agree, while not wholly uncontroversial flags are mere symbols - while
maps may imply the
On 16/09/2005, at 5:10 AM, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
I am writing this email because of my frustration with a situation in
the Persian GNOME team. I am seeking the advice of other people in the
GNOME project.
Roozbeh, i feel for you, particularly, in this situation, since the
team
Ole, thankyou very much for all your sustained effort, which has
achieved so much for your team and language community. I wish you
happiness and good fortune in the future.
Welcome to Martin, and good luck with the job!
On 18/09/2005, at 5:41 AM, Ole Laursen wrote:
I've had less and less
On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 23:40 +0430, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
Hi Harish,
It seems that the HEAD branch was mistakenly used for releasing
Evolution 2.4.0, at least regarding the translations. The affected
translations (translated and checked in to the gnome-2-12 branch before
release but not
Umm, why?
How can you possibly be tagging anything but the exact tree that was
used to build the code against which the testers verified?
If you are doing anything else, then you do not have a verifyable build.
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 13:54 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
2. The curtains are
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 17:31 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
Umm, why?
How can you possibly be tagging anything but the exact tree that was
used to build the code against which the testers verified?
(sigh) The intention was to tag the exact tree - which is why I tagged
HEAD (which was verified)
On Mon, September 19, 2005 10:24, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
However, it would be helpful if you could make incremental updates
during the development cycle [2] or have all your huge changes
committed at least a day prior to the deadline. This would limit the
damage caused by errors in
Dear friends,
Does any one have any experiences making Persian (Arabic or Herbew) xml docs for Yelp ? I have the rtl direction problem
Thanks-- Yours Sincerely, Mehdi Hassanpourhttp://ImPersian.com
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 13:54 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
2. All commits to 'po' were being made both to the stable branch and the
HEAD. Any reason why this was not done in the case of Persian, Bengali
translations?
Well, the double-checking-in is usually considered a good practice, but
is
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 13:00 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
On Mon, September 19, 2005 10:24, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
However, it would be helpful if you could make incremental updates
during the development cycle [2] or have all your huge changes
committed at least a day prior to the
Hi,
It is currently bit unclear to me what kind of policies are for
translation maintenance and file touching (soft) permissions.
It seems that in some modules maintainers, when making release, run
make update-po and commit after that. However such changes are
autogenerated (anyone can run that
Please report the problems you are having to the GNOME bugzilla. They
may be bugs:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
You can then send your bug numbers here (or to any other mailing list
with people who may be interested in the matter), so interested people
can know about them (and possibly help
On 9/19/05, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, September 19, 2005 10:24, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
However, it would be helpful if you could make incremental updates
during the development cycle [2] or have all your huge changes
committed at least a day prior to the
On 9/19/05, Harish Krishnaswamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Translators know that if they commit their translations on Monday, it
might already be too late for their translations to go in the release.
But if you need to make the tarball for the release before Monday,
then send an e-mail to
On ศ., 2005-09-16 at 18:03 +0200, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:37:51PM +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote:
Hi everyone,
Maybe we should look into providing alternative status pages until
Carlos responds. Anyone with a strong machine with a lot of unused
CPU cycles on a
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 02:11:32AM +0700, Ross Golder wrote:
On ???., 2005-09-16 at 18:03 +0200, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:37:51PM +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote:
Hi everyone,
Maybe we should look into providing alternative status pages until
Carlos responds.
On 9/19/05, Harish Krishnaswamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I am handicapped by the fact that
1. I do not know what languages I should watch out for - before carving
out a snapshot for pre-release testing.
snip
[1] The build verification by the Evolution QA team was done from rpms
17 matches
Mail list logo
