Recently the gnome.org automatic generation of the POT file for the
GParted User Guide has been failing. The last successfully generated
POT file appears to have been on 2014-01-10 17:19+. See:
https://l10n.gnome.org/module/gparted/
Can someone point me to who I should contact, or what I
Le mercredi 15 janvier 2014 à 09:59 -0700, Curtis Gedak a écrit :
Recently the gnome.org automatic generation of the POT file for the
GParted User Guide has been failing. The last successfully generated
POT file appears to have been on 2014-01-10 17:19+. See:
On 14-01-15 12:11 PM, Claude Paroz wrote:
Le mercredi 15 janvier 2014 à 09:59 -0700, Curtis Gedak a écrit :
Recently the gnome.org automatic generation of the POT file for the
GParted User Guide has been failing. The last successfully generated
POT file appears to have been on 2014-01-10
I'm happy to announce that these changes have landed in Shotwell
master. We combined the two separate sets of po files to keep things
simple. We also added the magic Makefile.am so the help can be
translated.
Will someone please add shotwell to DL? Let me know if there are any
issues.
2014/1/15 Charles Lindsay c...@yorba.org:
I'm happy to announce that these changes have landed in Shotwell master. We
combined the two separate sets of po files to keep things simple. We also
added the magic Makefile.am so the help can be translated.
Will someone please add shotwell to DL?
Thanks again, Piotr! That's two beers I owe you, now. :)
Cheers,
Charles
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Piotr Drąg piotrd...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014/1/15 Charles Lindsay c...@yorba.org:
I'm happy to announce that these changes have landed in Shotwell
master. We
combined the two
Hi Jim
I just submitted a request to the sysadmin team to create a git hook for
this check[0].
Meanwhile, until it really comes into existence, it would be great if
the following teams could check the results[1] of my little script[2]
and fix their translations:
bg
crh
hi
id
kn
ml
nl
pt
pt_BR
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Gabor Kelemen kelem...@gnome.hu wrote:
Hi Jim
I just submitted a request to the sysadmin team to create a git hook for
this check[0].
Meanwhile, until it really comes into existence, it would be great if
the following teams could check the results[1] of my
