Hi Piotr,
On 10/08/2012 11:32 PM, Piotr Drąg wrote:
It's sad to see translations removed, even if they are old and
problematic.
Some kinds of translations are better being removed than be shown to
users as-is. That's the whole story about some old Belarusian translations.
I agree typos and
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Piotr Drąg piotrd...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the explanation! That made some things clear. It's sad to
see translations removed, even if they are old and problematic. I
understand that your team is understaffed (or even this is an
understatement? :D), but
2012/10/8 Ihar Hrachyshka ihar.hrachys...@gmail.com:
Basically, this is because those translations has lots of serious flaws.
They are made with old orthography, has plenty of errors and typos, use
terms unknown to most users. The effect of such translations being in place
is that users just
Hi,
Basically, this is because those translations has lots of serious flaws.
They are made with old orthography, has plenty of errors and typos, use
terms unknown to most users. The effect of such translations being in place
is that users just switch to other locales which at least don't break
