Re: Pashto coordinator

2008-01-03 Thread Zabeeh khan
Hello, I, Zabeeh khan agree that the coordinatorship of GNOME should be given to Muhammad khalid ameery (Paiwastoon), as they will do it in a very good and managed way. I hope that you will give them the coordinatorship soon and solve the problem of Pashto team and I also hope that Muhammad khali

Re: Pashto coordinator

2008-01-02 Thread Mohammad Khalid Ameery
rk more > > and more willingly on it and we can do it in less time. You (Ismail) can > > also join us to work together. This is the formal mail asking about the > > changing of Pashto coordinator, if you don't answer this mail so might be > > without asking you they make

Pashto coordinator

2007-12-02 Thread admin
sorry.. I am Zabeehullah khan ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Re: Pashto coordinator

2007-12-02 Thread Claude Paroz
Le dimanche 02 décembre 2007 à 10:30 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > Please don't select anyone (neither me, nor khalid) for the Pashto team > coordination, because I am talking with him about this issue. When we get > to a result, both I and he will tell you and you will then decide. > > Act

Pashto coordinator

2007-12-02 Thread admin
Please don't select anyone (neither me, nor khalid) for the Pashto team coordination, because I am talking with him about this issue. When we get to a result, both I and he will tell you and you will then decide. Actually, I started a project by the name of Pathanisation project, which is fully ai

Re: Pashto coordinator

2007-11-26 Thread Christian Rose
rk more > and more willingly on it and we can do it in less time. You (Ismail) can > also join us to work together. This is the formal mail asking about the > changing of Pashto coordinator, if you don't answer this mail so might be > without asking you they make us the coordinator.

Re: Pashto - coordinator should be changed!!!

2007-11-26 Thread Christian Rose
On 9/4/07, zabeeh khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > According to the Pashton scholars and even the ISO 639 the correct spelling > should be "Pashto". ISO 639 says "Pashto;Pushto", which means both of them are > correct. but the most authentic is "Pashto". > > Pakhtosoft and all the compani

Re: Pashto coordinator should be chaged now

2007-09-17 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Hello, > I have mailed the mailing list and CCed it to Ismail maskani too (about > changing the coordinator > > of Pashto), but he is not replying and 10 days are also complete (even 12 > days). So the > > Coordination shall be given to me. give me = demanding for something could you give me =

Pashto coordinator should be chaged now

2007-09-17 Thread zabeeh khan
Hello, I have mailed the mailing list and CCed it to Ismail maskani too (about changing the coordinator of Pashto), but he is not replying and 10 days are also complete (even 12 days). So the Coordination shall be given to me. ___ gnome-i18n mailing lis

Pashto coordinator

2007-09-06 Thread zabeeh khan
) can also join us to work together. This is the formal mail asking about the changing of Pashto coordinator, if you don't answer this mail so might be without asking you they make us the coordinator. I am asking you to reply to this mail. thanks www.pakhtosof

Re: Pashto - coordinator should be changed!!!

2007-09-05 Thread Danilo Šegan
Hi Zabeeh, Yesterday at 5:15, zabeeh khan wrote: > But if he is not responding, then?? - We tried much to contact him, but > he doesn't answers!!! I think he has forgot about GNOME!!! We (Pakhtosoft) > have five members in our company (ready to translate) and we want to start > the translatio

Re: Pashto - coordinator should be changed!!!

2007-09-04 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
CC-ing the present coordinator, since I'm not sure whether he's is subscribed to the list or not. On 9/4/07, zabeeh khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > According to the Pashton scholars and even the ISO 639 the correct spelling > should be "Pashto". ISO > > 639 says "Pashto;Pushto", whi

Re: Pashto - coordinator should be changed!!!

2007-09-04 Thread zabeeh khan
Hello, According to the Pashton scholars and even the ISO 639 the correct spelling should be "Pashto". ISO 639 says "Pashto;Pushto", which means both of them are correct. but the most authentic is "Pashto". Pakhtosoft and all the companies working for Pashto uses the name "Pashto" not "Pushto", s

Pashto team update (Was: Re: Pashto - coordinator should be changed!)

2007-09-03 Thread Simos Xenitellis
Hi, There are some existing threads on Pashto/Pushto, at http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2006-September/msg00099.html http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2006-August/msg00199.html http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2006-September/msg00020.html For the official name of the la

Pashto - coordinator should be changed!!!

2007-09-03 Thread zabeeh khan
Dear brother, Someone has added the Pashto in the languages list, but he is non-responsive I have sent him mail, but he doesn't reply. So we want to take coordination work, I mean we are a company called Pakhtosoft, we develop software and OS for Pashto. And now we want to translate the GNOME to Pa