Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-08-04 Thread Gil Forcada
Ok, DL updated (from 2.14 up to 2.22 with this branch). Cheers, El dt 05 de 08 de 2008 a les 00:25 +0200, en/na Andre Klapper va escriure: > Thomas Wood píše v Po 04. 08. 2008 v 22:57 +0100: > > In SVN, branches (and tags for that matter) are just copies of a > > particular revision, so it's eas

Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-08-04 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
2008-08-04 klockan 23:57 skrev Thomas Wood: > In SVN, branches (and tags for that matter) are just copies of a > particular revision, so it's easy to create retrospective branches and > tags. Which I have now done for gnome-backgrounds. Hope everyone is > happy now. :-) Everyone will be happy only

Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-08-04 Thread Andre Klapper
Thomas Wood píše v Po 04. 08. 2008 v 22:57 +0100: > In SVN, branches (and tags for that matter) are just copies of a > particular revision, so it's easy to create retrospective branches and > tags. Which I have now done for gnome-backgrounds. Hope everyone is > happy now. :-) Ah, a branch!: http:/

Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-08-04 Thread Thomas Wood
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 22:58 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > Thomas Wood píše v Po 04. 08. 2008 v 21:50 +0100: > > On 4 Aug 2008, at 19:17, Andre Klapper wrote: > > > Again: Please do revert this and branch correctly first. > > > I think Vincent explained it quite well (see below). > > > > Presumably

Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-08-04 Thread Andre Klapper
Thomas Wood píše v Po 04. 08. 2008 v 21:50 +0100: > On 4 Aug 2008, at 19:17, Andre Klapper wrote: > > Again: Please do revert this and branch correctly first. > > I think Vincent explained it quite well (see below). > > Presumably if I create a branch, I don't need to revert? Oops. Yes, I think y

Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-08-04 Thread Thomas Wood
On 4 Aug 2008, at 19:17, Andre Klapper wrote: Thomas, Again: Please do revert this and branch correctly first. I think Vincent explained it quite well (see below). Presumably if I create a branch, I don't need to revert? Regards, Thomas ___ gnom

Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-08-04 Thread Andre Klapper
Thomas, Again: Please do revert this and branch correctly first. I think Vincent explained it quite well (see below). Thanks, andre Am Mittwoch, den 23.07.2008, 16:00 +0200 schrieb Vincent Untz: > Le mercredi 23 juillet 2008, à 10:55 +0100, Thomas Wood a écrit : > > On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 22:02 -

Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-07-23 Thread Claude Paroz
Le mer 23 jui 2008 03:02:08 CEST, "Leonardo F. Fontenelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: Em Ter, 2008-07-22 às 22:48 +0200, Claude Paroz escreveu: Le mar 22 jui 2008 22:09:39 CEST, Thomas Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: > > I'm not quite sure I follow, we are only in string change announceme

Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-07-23 Thread Claude Paroz
Le mer 23 jui 2008 11:55:49 CEST, Thomas Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 22:02 -0300, Leonardo F. Fontenelle wrote: Em Ter, 2008-07-22 às 22:48 +0200, Claude Paroz escreveu: > Le mar 22 jui 2008 22:09:39 CEST, Thomas Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: [...] > The proble

Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-07-23 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 23 juillet 2008, à 10:55 +0100, Thomas Wood a écrit : > On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 22:02 -0300, Leonardo F. Fontenelle wrote: > > Em Ter, 2008-07-22 às 22:48 +0200, Claude Paroz escreveu: > > > Le mar 22 jui 2008 22:09:39 CEST, Thomas Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: > [...] > > > The probl

Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-07-23 Thread Thomas Wood
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 22:02 -0300, Leonardo F. Fontenelle wrote: > Em Ter, 2008-07-22 às 22:48 +0200, Claude Paroz escreveu: > > Le mar 22 jui 2008 22:09:39 CEST, Thomas Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: [...] > > The problem is that strings from gnome-backgrounds didn't change for > > long, and

Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-07-22 Thread Leonardo F. Fontenelle
Em Ter, 2008-07-22 às 22:48 +0200, Claude Paroz escreveu: > Le mar 22 jui 2008 22:09:39 CEST, Thomas Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: > > > > I'm not quite sure I follow, we are only in string change announcement > > period, and I was just about to announce these changes. These changes > > are for

Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-07-22 Thread Claude Paroz
Le mar 22 jui 2008 22:09:39 CEST, Thomas Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: Hi Andre, I'm not quite sure I follow, we are only in string change announcement period, and I was just about to announce these changes. These changes are for 2.23. Please explain if I have missed something. The proble

Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-07-22 Thread Thomas Wood
Hi Andre, I'm not quite sure I follow, we are only in string change announcement period, and I was just about to announce these changes. These changes are for 2.23. Please explain if I have missed something. Regards, Thomas On 22 Jul 2008, at 18:34, Andre Klapper wrote: Thomas, can you

Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-07-22 Thread Andre Klapper
Thomas, can you please revert this by branching correctly first? Thanks. Am Dienstag, den 22.07.2008, 16:54 + schrieb GNOME Status Pages: > This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: > http://l10n.gnome.org/. > > There have been following string additions to mo

String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'

2008-07-22 Thread GNOME Status Pages
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gnome.org/. There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD': + "Aqua" + "Blinds" + "Dune" + "Flow" + "Garden" + "Gulp" + "Lady Bird" + "Rain Drops"