Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:57:14AM -0500, Thomas Thurman wrote:
Ysgrifennodd Marcel Telka:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 09:43:51PM -0500, Thomas Thurman wrote:
Maybe in future we need to make the gettext tools enforce a rule that
the header block of a .po file contains licence
Hi,
Andre Klapper wrote:
This is about http://www.gnome.org/~tthurman/yo-ha-ig/ .
These are .po files extracted from a Nigerian distro called Wazobia
Linux.
Several KDE and GNOME applications were translated into the three
languages in the subject line, a user has found a disk image,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi,
Andre Klapper wrote:
This is about http://www.gnome.org/~tthurman/yo-ha-ig/ .
These are .po files extracted from a Nigerian distro called Wazobia
Linux.
Several KDE and GNOME applications were translated into the three
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 09:43:51PM -0500, Thomas Thurman wrote:
Maybe in future we need to make the gettext tools enforce a rule that
the header block of a .po file contains licence information, instead of
assuming it's okay to leave it in the comments.
Then we should also enforce compiler
Ysgrifennodd Marcel Telka:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 09:43:51PM -0500, Thomas Thurman wrote:
Maybe in future we need to make the gettext tools enforce a rule that
the header block of a .po file contains licence information, instead of
assuming it's okay to leave it in the comments.
Then we
Luis Villa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi,
Andre Klapper wrote:
This is about http://www.gnome.org/~tthurman/yo-ha-ig/ .
These are .po files extracted from a Nigerian distro called Wazobia
Linux.
Several KDE and GNOME applications were translated
CC'ing kde-i18n-doc@ and GNOME's legal-l...@.
Everybody please take a second to think before hitting the Reply to
all button. Thanks. :-P
Start of this thread:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2008-December/msg00071.html
** QUICK SUMMARY: **
This is about
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
So to me it boils down to the question: Can we just take the .po files
without asking anybody? and (like Johannes wrote earlier) if a
translation can be considered a derived work.
The translations are probably derived work
Ysgrifennodd Roozbeh Pournader:
It all boils down to if the actual software itself (Wazobia Linux, and
its parts) was released under an (L)GPL(-compatible) license or not.
http://wazobialinux.com/software_philosoph.html and
http://wazobialinux.com/software_developer.html claim it was released
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Thomas Thurman tthur...@gnome.org wrote:
Should I go and find the person who sent me the .mo files and ask them for
the iso and look somewhere on it for the licence, and if so, any idea where?
I don't fancy booting off some random iso off the net just to see
Ysgrifennodd Roozbeh Pournader:
License screens don't really matter. The actual license files on the
disc do (or so I believe). So, mounting the ISO and dissecting it may
be sufficient. No need to boot from it.
Thanks. The ISO seems to have vanished, but there's a 480Mb disk image
here,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Thomas Thurman tthur...@gnome.org wrote:
Ysgrifennodd Roozbeh Pournader:
License screens don't really matter. The actual license files on the
disc do (or so I believe). So, mounting the ISO and dissecting it may
be sufficient. No need to boot from it.
Thanks.
Ysgrifennodd Luis Villa:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Thomas Thurman tthur...@gnome.org wrote:
Thanks. The ISO seems to have vanished, but there's a 480Mb disk image
here, which seems to be where the .mo files came from:
http://wazobialinux.com/downloads/wlce.hda.img.21.09.2006
Could
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Thomas Thurman tthur...@gnome.org wrote:
Ysgrifennodd Luis Villa:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Thomas Thurman tthur...@gnome.org
wrote:
Thanks. The ISO seems to have vanished, but there's a 480Mb disk image
here, which seems to be where the .mo files
14 matches
Mail list logo
