Am Freitag, den 13.05.2011, 10:48 +0200 schrieb Martin Seifert:
> What I would like to see is an (optional) feature or extension that
> allows me to open an application not on a new workspace at the end of
> all existing workspaces, but on a new workspace above the currently
> selected workspace.
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 23:02 +0100, Tim Murphy wrote:
> On 13 May 2011 21:55, Adam Tauno Williams
> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 14:10 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> > >Last I checked, GNOME never only allowed "one way" to use the
> desktop.
> > >Even with GNOME 3, which I admit isn't the most
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 14:10 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> >Last I checked, GNOME never only allowed "one way" to use the desktop.
> >Even with GNOME 3, which I admit isn't the most customizable thing in
> >the world (though I don't mind), there's quite a few ways to use your
> >desktop. You c
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Cyril Arnaud wrote:
> I don't think that you can measure efficiency on the speed of launching an
> application. After all, we don't spend uor days launching app. We launch
> them , and we work with them (or play or whatever).
> The efficiency has to be considered a
I don't think that you can measure efficiency on the speed of launching
an application. After all, we don't spend uor days launching app. We
launch them , and we work with them (or play or whatever).
The efficiency has to be considered at a high level. In other words : is
your work day easier or wo
On Thu, 12 May 2011 09:19:54 -0500, you wrote:
>While the article was... interesting... I found a few notable problems
>and false assumptions in it that disprove it's position:
>
>1. "But the danger of studying too much usability theory is not just the
>temptation to assume infallibility."
>
>La
Am Freitag, den 13.05.2011, 06:33 -0700 schrieb Jeffery Olson:
> Interesting idea, but maybe the solution is simpler: Perhaps the
> concept of the "new, auto-created empty workspace" should extend to
> both ends of the workspace "chain" (That is: make the list of
> workspaces a dequeue.. this behav
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 21:23 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 03:50 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> [Incoming email doesn't go into the reminders]
> > OK. Is there some place unread email *can* go?
> Your mail program's Inbox, as always.
> (I'm not yet sure how this int
Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 21:23 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero a écrit :
> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 03:50 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
>
> [Incoming email doesn't go into the reminders]
> > OK. Is there some place unread email *can* go?
>
> Your mail program's Inbox, as always.
>
> I want the Remind
Dear Gnome-Shell-Developers,
Please excuse the wall of text, but I am so happy with the Gnome-Shell
that I want to give you some feedback. You find my feature request at
the bottom of this mail, so you can easily skip the "spam".
First let me thank you for all the hard mindstorming and coding wor
10 matches
Mail list logo
