On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Artur Wroblewski
> wrote:
[...]
>> don't get me wrong, i really get your post and understand the
>> need of transition time, but please take into account that
>> people miss a lot of functionality, configu
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 05:55 +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
> well, your blog entry sounds like gnome applets never existed
>
> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-applets/
>
> but they did exist and were part of gnome core.
Well, I didn't want to make things too complicated. I may
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Bob Gustafson wrote:
> I do apologize to the dedicated developers who are trying to make things
> better. I certainly do not know who is actually working on the project.
That's visible at:
http://foundation.gnome.org/membership/members.php
http://git.g
I do apologize to the dedicated developers who are trying to make things
better. I certainly do not know who is actually working on the project.
Still a bit paranoid..
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 17:07 -0700, Luis Villa wrote:
> The project is led by people who have given more than a half-decade
> (and
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 17:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 23:14 +0100, Another Sillyname wrote:
> >>
> >> > There's plenty of space on the top bar to
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 17:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 23:14 +0100, Another Sillyname wrote:
>>
>> > There's plenty of space on the top bar to allow them, so what's the logic?
>
>> Sorry if that was long, but I wa
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 03:21 +0100, Another Sillyname wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation Adam, I feel a bit like the girl who asked
> for a kiss and in response you started to take your pants off..
That's me, forever taking my pants off at the least provocation ;)
> I understand that the pan
On 01/06/2011, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 17:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 23:14 +0100, Another Sillyname wrote:
>>
>> > There's plenty of space on the top bar to allow them, so what's the
>> > logic?
>
>> Sorry if that was long, but I wanted to make
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 17:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 23:14 +0100, Another Sillyname wrote:
>
> > There's plenty of space on the top bar to allow them, so what's the logic?
> Sorry if that was long, but I wanted to make it as clear as possible. I
> hope it helps.
So I
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 23:14 +0100, Another Sillyname wrote:
> There's plenty of space on the top bar to allow them, so what's the logic?
1) be clear about what's been removed. The sensors applet was never core
GNOME code; it's an add-on, an extra. What is removed in GNOME 3 is the
panel applet in
Perhaps the Gnome developer group has been infiltrated by folks who are
paid to make FOSS look bad?
Just paranoid..
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 23:14 +0100, Another Sillyname wrote:
> I've just installed Gnome Shell as part of a F15 build, it's the first
> time I've played with it and have pretty much
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Another Sillyname <
anothersn...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I've just installed Gnome Shell as part of a F15 build, it's the first
> time I've played with it and have pretty much ignored the build up as
> I prefer to judge these things myself.
>
> While I'm not total
I've just installed Gnome Shell as part of a F15 build, it's the first
time I've played with it and have pretty much ignored the build up as
I prefer to judge these things myself.
While I'm not totally comfortable yet with the changes I'm willing to
use it for a couple of weeks before making decis
13 matches
Mail list logo
