>
>
> I tried this. It disables the dynamic workspaces. But unfortunately it does
> not give horizontal workspace navigation. All the workspaces are in one big
> vertical column. So, it is not much of a use to me sadly :(
>
>
I see what you are saying, it only solves one issue (static-workspaces),
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 3:38 AM, jordan wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Sankar P wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:34 PM, G. Michael Carter > > wrote:
>>
>>> Well using the short cut keys for Desktop 1-9 is rather useless. You
>>> close mail for what every reason and there's
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Sankar P wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:34 PM, G. Michael Carter
> wrote:
>
>> Well using the short cut keys for Desktop 1-9 is rather useless. You
>> close mail for what every reason and there's no way to put mail back on
>> Workspace 2, without putting it
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:34 PM, G. Michael Carter wrote:
> Well using the short cut keys for Desktop 1-9 is rather useless. You
> close mail for what every reason and there's no way to put mail back on
> Workspace 2, without putting it on WS 2 then moving all other windows in WS2
> to WS3. WS3
I'm a fan of a grid layout, too. I've using this method for
organization for probably 15+ years, starting back with fvwm (always
been 3x3 for me). Having the workspace in my tray or panel or whatever
was a nice reminder of where my windows were. I'm getting used to
dynamic workspaces (I'm wi
Well using the short cut keys for Desktop 1-9 is rather useless. You close
mail for what every reason and there's no way to put mail back on Workspace
2, without putting it on WS 2 then moving all other windows in WS2 to WS3.
WS3 windows to WS4... etc to WS8 windows to WS9.
With dynamic workspac
On Saturday, May 14, 2011 16:07:23 Diego Fernandez wrote:
> you don't have to be working on all 9 at the same time. I have plenty
> of computer resources and leaving my windows open in its assigned
> workspace for later use is much more efficient than closing them all
> and reopening later. Nowad
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 09:19 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Milan Bouchet-Valat
>> wrote:
>> Le samedi 14 mai 2011 à 10:51 -0400, G. Michael Carter a écrit :
>> > Usually I work on dual 24" monitors
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 09:19 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Milan Bouchet-Valat
> wrote:
> Le samedi 14 mai 2011 à 10:51 -0400, G. Michael Carter a écrit :
> > Usually I work on dual 24" monitors so I'll have maybe 2 virtual
> > windows open. But I was working o
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> Le samedi 14 mai 2011 à 10:51 -0400, G. Michael Carter a écrit :
> > Usually I work on dual 24" monitors so I'll have maybe 2 virtual
> > windows open. But I was working on a laptop all this week and with
> > the 15" screen I've had ab
Le samedi 14 mai 2011 à 10:51 -0400, G. Michael Carter a écrit :
> Usually I work on dual 24" monitors so I'll have maybe 2 virtual
> windows open. But I was working on a laptop all this week and with
> the 15" screen I've had about 9 workspaces going.
>
>
> Moving between them I find is slowin
Usually I work on dual 24" monitors so I'll have maybe 2 virtual windows
open. But I was working on a laptop all this week and with the 15" screen
I've had about 9 workspaces going.
Moving between them I find is slowing me down in Gnome 3.
One thing slowing me down is when I need to go from 1 to
12 matches
Mail list logo
