On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:56:17 +0100
Daniel Olivera dan...@ututo.org wrote:
El 23/03/11 03:36, Rubén Rodríguez escribió:
The copyright file provided by google (the one linked at the LP
blacklist) is ok, but the actual copyright file provided by Ubuntu
is this humongous thing:
El 23/03/11 13:23, Rubén Rodríguez escribió:
It includes things marked as Copyright: UNKNOWN: License: *No
copyright* UNKNOWN
That is problem only for ubuntu or debian.
I don't understand why, could you explain this?
I dont use more of my time for these.
The debian one (they have it
Thank you very much people.
I now have a clearer panorama. Can conclude (as of the info provided)
that Debian and Ubuntu introduce a lot of files/licencing changes in
Chromium that are not on the source of Chromium?
I now have a clearer panorama.
How?
Can conclude (as of the info
provided) that Debian and Ubuntu introduce a lot of files/licencing
changes in Chromium that are not on the source of Chromium?
No, they don't. What they do is actually look into the files they
distribute instead of assume
Il giorno mer, 23/03/2011 alle 09.42 -0500, Quiliro Ordóñez ha scritto:
Thank you very much people.
I now have a clearer panorama. Can conclude (as of the info provided)
that Debian and Ubuntu introduce a lot of files/licencing changes in
Chromium that are not on the source of Chromium?
Do you know where to find a chromium source tarball which is
verified free software?
Please try in super secret site at www.chromium.org
You can download alse an svn copy for developers at src.chromium.org
So, either you verified that those sources are free software or you
think there is
El 23/03/11 10:14, Rubén Rodríguez escribió:
I now have a clearer panorama.
How?
With the info provided in this thread and the one in Ututo's list.
Can conclude (as of the info
provided) that Debian and Ubuntu introduce a lot of files/licencing
changes in Chromium that are not on the source
El 23/03/11 11:17, Daniel Olivera escribió:
El 23/03/11 17:04, Rubén Rodríguez escribió:
Do you know where to find a chromium source tarball which is
verified free software?
Please try in super secret site at www.chromium.org
You can download alse an svn copy for developers at src.chromium.org
El 23/03/11 05:17, Daniel Olivera dijo:
El 23/03/11 17:04, Rubén Rodríguez escribió:
Do you know where to find a chromium source tarball which is
verified free software?
Please try in super secret site at www.chromium.org
You can download alse an svn copy for developers at
El 23/03/11 10:25, crap0101 escribió:
Il giorno mer, 23/03/2011 alle 09.42 -0500, Quiliro Ordóñez ha scritto:
Thank you very much people.
I now have a clearer panorama. Can conclude (as of the info provided)
that Debian and Ubuntu introduce a lot of files/licencing changes in
Chromium that are
El 23/03/11 17:37, Nicolás Reynolds escribió:
..
May I ask if you do that with every package, and if that is the reason
for leaving blobs inside UTUTO's kernel? They say is GPL2 after all.
Saludos a todos esta lista me canso.
Una mas
No se es mejor porque el otro sea peor.
Se es mejor
El 23/03/11 12:09, Daniel Olivera escribió:
El 23/03/11 17:37, Nicolás Reynolds escribió:
..
May I ask if you do that with every package, and if that is the reason
for leaving blobs inside UTUTO's kernel? They say is GPL2 after all.
Saludos a todos esta lista me canso.
Una mas
No se es
Quiliro Ordóñez quil...@congresolibre.org wrote ..
Does this mean you cannot have the freedom to modify this information
file?
It doesn't specifically say that, no... only that you may recompile and
redistribute. Nothing more.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
13 matches
Mail list logo
