What a total fucking waste of time.
The stench in that basement must be overwhelming.
The smell of body odor and pizza is not a good one.
On 30 Mar 2011 00:05:04 -0400, secret...@lxny.org wrote:
>what="two official announcements"
> first="'Don\'t be fooled' Mobile Security Hackday
>
RJack wrote:
[...]
> Now, the SFLC utterly ignores the circuit precedent and claims:
>
> "Further, once Best Buy made a distribution of BusyBox that did not
> comply with the license terms, the license terminated, and therefore any
> further act of copying or distributing BusyBox by Best Buy (eve
As the SFLC and Erik Andersen are learning to their dismay, a valid
Copyright Office registration of an open source project such as a
version of BusyBox requires the registration of all the *individual*
contributors' work all the way back to the original author's initial
contribution. In order fo
RJack writes:
> As the SFLC and Erik Andersen are learning to their dismay, a valid
> Copyright Office registration of an open source project such as a
> version of BusyBox requires the registration of all the *individual*
> contributors' work all the way back to the original author's initial
> c
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> The respective chances for success of copyright enforcement in court
> are what causes the FSF to get copyright assignments ...
Dear dak, you know quite well that Stallman has no balls to sue for
copyright infringement because Stallman is in business of giving
"Copy
On 3/30/2011 10:28 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
RJack writes:
As the SFLC and Erik Andersen are learning to their dismay, a
valid Copyright Office registration of an open source project such
as a version of BusyBox requires the registration of all the
*individual* contributors' work all the way ba
Alexander Terekhov writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> The respective chances for success of copyright enforcement in court
>> are what causes the FSF to get copyright assignments ...
>
> Dear dak, you know quite well that Stallman has no balls to sue for
> copyright infringement because
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> What rock have you been living under? The whole point of the GPL (as
> opposed to, say, BSD style licenses) is that it is firmly rooted in
> copyright ...
In context, copyright means that the owner has exclusive right to
copy in order to sell (permissions to make) c
Hey Mackenzie,
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> [...]
> > You agree with what you like, Alex. I have talked extensively with
> > eye-witnesses, including one who was on the demonstration the police
> > attacked by shooting people in the face with water canons on 30th
>
> O
Alexander Terekhov writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> What rock have you been living under? The whole point of the GPL (as
>> opposed to, say, BSD style licenses) is that it is firmly rooted in
>> copyright ...
>
> In context, copyright means that the owner has exclusive right to
> copy
On 3/30/2011 6:04 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov writes:
David Kastrup wrote: [...]
What rock have you been living under? The whole point of the
GPL (as opposed to, say, BSD style licenses) is that it is
firmly rooted in copyright ...
In context, copyright means that the owner
11 matches
Mail list logo