due to her if it turns out Terekhov is behind attacks on the GPL paranoia.
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100403103524185#comments
Enforcement of the GNU GPL in Germany and Europe, by Till Jaeger
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, April 03 2010 @ 12:07 PM EDT
Terekhov will not be
On 4/8/2010 12:01 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
due to her if it turns out Terekhov is behind attacks on the GPL paranoia.
I know that creating single-spaced incomprehensible screeds
is the hallmark of every good crank, and I know that properly
formatting errors doesn't make them any less
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
should try to format your messages so that readers don't give
up in incomprehension.
Try
On 4/8/2010 12:33 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Try
http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.misc.discuss/tree/browse_frm/thread/a5c349a25ca65991/214ecbb400cbe67a?hl=enrnum=1_done=%2Fgroup%2Fgnu.misc.discuss%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2Fa5c349a25ca65991%3Fhl%3Den%26#doc_214ecbb400cbe67a
Huh? That's
Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com writes:
On 4/8/2010 12:01 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
due to her if it turns out Terekhov is behind attacks on the GPL paranoia.
I know that creating single-spaced incomprehensible screeds
is the hallmark of every good crank, and I know that properly
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[... indentation ...]
Uh idiot Hyman...
For indentation, go to
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100403103524185#comments
and search for Terekhov, silly Hyman.
regards,
alexander.
P.S. Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the
David Kastrup wrote:
Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com writes:
On 4/8/2010 12:01 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
due to her if it turns out Terekhov is behind attacks on the GPL
paranoia.
I know that creating single-spaced incomprehensible screeds
is the hallmark of every good crank,
On 4/8/2010 12:53 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Uh idiot Hyman...
For indentation, go to
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100403103524185#comments
and search for Terekhov, silly Hyman.
The point of communication is to communicate. If you
choose not to expend effort on making your
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/8/2010 12:53 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Uh idiot Hyman...
For indentation, go to
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100403103524185#comments
and search for Terekhov, silly Hyman.
The point of communication is to communicate.
Here's the
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/8/2010 12:53 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Uh idiot Hyman...
For indentation, go to
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100403103524185#comments
and search for Terekhov, silly Hyman.
The point of
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/8/2010 12:53 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Uh idiot Hyman...
For indentation, go to
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100403103524185#comments
and search for Terekhov, silly
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/8/2010 12:53 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Uh idiot Hyman...
For indentation, go to
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
So the wording of the verdict makes clear that the GPL is the
_permission_ to enter into a contractual relation, but not a contract in
Hey dak,
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drogenbesitz
Hth.
regards,
alexander.
P.S. Every computer program in the world, BusyBox
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
due to her if it turns out Terekhov is behind attacks on the GPL
paranoia.
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100403103524185#comments
Enforcement of the GNU GPL in Germany and Europe, by Till Jaeger
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, April 03 2010 @ 12:07
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
[ snip ]
If there was any meaning, any point made in the snipped material, it
totally escapes me. Any chance you might like to restate your point in a
concise and clear paragraph? I'm assuming that you had some point to
make.
--
Alan Mackenzie
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
[ snip ]
If there was any meaning, any point made in the snipped material, it
totally escapes me. Any chance you might like to restate your point
in a concise and clear paragraph?
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
Seriosly, as for Dan Wallace, I've told him
I suggest you file a request for hearing en banc. If the
price for doing it is a restraint, please let me know.
He replied:
This appellate level ruling completely peels
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
Seriosly, as for Dan Wallace, I've told him
I suggest you file a request for hearing en banc. If the
price for doing it is a restraint, please let me know.
He replied:
This appellate level ruling completely peels The United States
Department of
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
[ snip ]
If there was any meaning, any point made in the snipped material, it
totally escapes me. Any chance you might like to restate your point in a
concise and clear paragraph? I'm assuming that you had some point to
19 matches
Mail list logo
