BTW...
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
[...]
> In Mirage, Albuquerque A.R.T. removed pages from a book of artwork
> (for which Mirage Editions owned a copyright), mounted the pages on
> ceramic tiles, and sold the tiles. According to the Ninth Circuit,
^
Merijn de Weerd wrote:
[...]
> The full cite is
> HR 19 januari 1979, NJ 1979, 412 (Hovener/Poortvliet)
>
> I noted it got cited in Canada:
> http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc34/2002scc34.html
That is really helpful. Thanks.
>
> Since it's from 1979, no one has thought to put up an
On 2006-06-30, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need a link, please.
Thank you. Some English-language summaries are at
http://www.iusmentis.com/copyright/crashcourse/rights/
http://www.iusmentis.com/auteursrecht/nl/vvv/beperkingen/#uitputting
I think you actually know that guy. :)
To my understand this "first sale" thing is only about that particular copy
you get. i.e., you can give that particular copy to anyone without getting
copyright holder's permission, but once you give it out, the right ends. It
makes no sense to say that you can _copy_ any material under the "fir
Merijn de Weerd wrote:
>
> On 2006-06-30, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Merijn de Weerd wrote:
> > [...]
> >> An interesting case happened some time ago here in the Netherlands.
> >> A calendar was published that contained for every month a nice
> >> reproduction of a painting
On 2006-06-30, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Merijn de Weerd wrote:
> [...]
>> An interesting case happened some time ago here in the Netherlands.
>> A calendar was published that contained for every month a nice
>> reproduction of a painting, all by the same painter (Rien
>> Poor
Merijn de Weerd wrote:
[...]
> An interesting case happened some time ago here in the Netherlands.
> A calendar was published that contained for every month a nice
> reproduction of a painting, all by the same painter (Rien
> Poortvliet). Someone bought a lot of calendars, cut out the
> reproducti
Merijn de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2006-06-30, Stefaan A Eeckels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And as such it is not interesting to split a book into chapters for
>> separate resale. One could imagine doing so with a book that's a
>> compilation of articles, for example. I'm quite su
On 2006-06-30, Stefaan A Eeckels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And as such it is not interesting to split a book into chapters for
> separate resale. One could imagine doing so with a book that's a
> compilation of articles, for example. I'm quite sure that the copyright
> holders would not be inter
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:13:14 +0200
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In fact, it is so insightful that nobody wants to read it.
LOL
> A right-wing organization buys large amounts of those books for
> close to nothing, cuts off the back half and introduction, binds the
> remains into new
Stefaan A Eeckels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 09:07:59 +0200
> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Tim Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Basically, it
>> > says that if you have a legal copy of a copyrighted work, you do
>> > *NOT* need the permission of t
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 09:07:59 +0200
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Basically, it
> > says that if you have a legal copy of a copyrighted work, you do
> > *NOT* need the permission of the copyright owner to distribute it.
> >
> > This is why
Tim Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred
> M. Szmidt wrote:
>>How about a link to this legislation, GNUtian ams?
>>
>> Sure, copyright law. But I doubt that you are familiar with that.
>
> Try 17 USC 109.
>
> This is the codification of the first sale do
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred
M. Szmidt wrote:
>How about a link to this legislation, GNUtian ams?
>
> Sure, copyright law. But I doubt that you are familiar with that.
Try 17 USC 109.
This is the codification of the first sale doctrine. Basically, it says
that if you have a legal
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> >> Yes, and a preparatory step for creating a CD can hardly be called a
>> >> preservational measure.
>> >
>> > I don't see why.
>>
>> Because it is a copy on the way to a CD.
>
> But it may not end up on a CD unless
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> >> Yes, and a preparatory step for creating a CD can hardly be called a
> >> preservational measure.
> >
> > I don't see why.
>
> Because it is a copy on the way to a CD.
But it may not end up on a CD unless I "prepare archival copies of it
to guard against destruct
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> >> I suppose that you look up "archive" in a dictionary of your choice.
>> >
>> > Uh, "the material preserved". (See also 17 USC 117.)
>>
>> Yes, and a preparatory step for creating a CD can hardly be called a
>> pre
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> >> I suppose that you look up "archive" in a dictionary of your choice.
> >
> > Uh, "the material preserved". (See also 17 USC 117.)
>
> Yes, and a preparatory step for creating a CD can hardly be called a
> preservational measure.
I don't see why. A CD may have a de
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:35:50 +0200
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
> [...]
> > > "There is no dispute that section 109 applies to works in digital
> > > form. Physical copies of works in a digital format, such as CDs
> > > or DVDs, are subject to sectio
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> > "There is no dispute that section 109 applies to works in digital
>> >> > form. Physical copies of works in a digital for
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
> > [...]
> >> > "There is no dispute that section 109 applies to works in digital
> >> > form. Physical copies of works in a digital format, such as CDs
> >> > or DVDs, are subject to section
"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
[...]
>Yes. If you buy a book, you can sell your copy. That is what first
>sale is about - the copyright holder can control copying, but once
>a copy has been sold (lawfully acquired), the copyright holder
>cannot control what is done with that copy.
>
>
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
> [...]
>> > "There is no dispute that section 109 applies to works in digital
>> > form. Physical copies of works in a digital format, such as CDs
>> > or DVDs, are subject to section 109 in the same way as physical
>> > co
Qui, 2006-06-29 às 19:35 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> > Downloading the same program 500 times with the purpose of distributing
> > these copies (and which results in exactly the same situation as if one
> > downloaded once and copied 499 times) would not result in 500 lawful
> > copies,
Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
[...]
> > "There is no dispute that section 109 applies to works in digital
> > form. Physical copies of works in a digital format, such as CDs or
> > DVDs, are subject to section 109 in the same way as physical
> > copies in analog form. Similarly, a lawfully made tang
How about a link to this legislation, GNUtian ams?
Sure, copyright law. But I doubt that you are familiar with that.
> | 3. You may copy and distribute the Program
Full stop.
Party B does NOT "copy and distribute".
| 6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based
Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
[... "first sale" ...]
> In the absence of clear definitions, the interpretations of the courts
> become crucial.
http://www.copyright.gov/reports/studies/dmca/sec-104-report-vol-1.pdf
"There is no dispute that section 109 applies to works in digital
form. Physical co
"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
[...]
> Party B is distributing a verbatim copy, that it is or isn't a a new
> copy isn't relevant. ^^^
^^^
That may well be true in the GNU Republic under its Copyleft Act.
How about a link to this legislati
28 matches
Mail list logo
