Tarquin Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Kastrup wrote:
>> Tarquin Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Kastrup wrote:
>> >> Tarquin Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> > Should the FSF back complete monopolisation
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Kastrup wrote:
> Tarquin Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Kastrup wrote:
> >> Tarquin Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > Should the FSF back complete monopolisation by Microsoft, or should
> >> > it be against, as
Tarquin Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Tarquin Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Should the FSF back complete monopolisation by Microsoft, or should
>> > it be against, as it aims to produce an ope
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tarquin Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Should the FSF back complete monopolisation by Microsoft, or should
> > it be against, as it aims to produce an operating system written in
> > 100% free software cod
Tarquin Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should the FSF back complete monopolisation by Microsoft, or should
> it be against, as it aims to produce an operating system written in
> 100% free software code?
It does neither mean that I back all my neighbors or am against all of
them if I happen
Should the FSF back complete monopolisation by Microsoft, or should it be
against, as it aims to produce an operating system written in 100% free
software code?
--
http://www.windowshaters.co.uk
Start an investigation into Microsoft http://www.petitiononline.com/oftsucks/
Reboot Movement (An An
