Re: ./configure

1998-11-20 Thread Rob Browning
Jeremy Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There is not a check for readline in configure.in there is however what > appears to be a check to see what libs guile needs. It is a bunch of > nested AC_CHECK_LIB tests. Each additional one adds more library to the > test to see if it will compile.

Re: more on configure.in

1998-11-20 Thread Rob Browning
Jeremy Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > # Check for readline, and dl libs.. they are needed for guile > AC_CHECK_LIB(readline, readline) This bit is already in the latest version. > AC_CHECK_LIB(dl, dlopen) I'd rather leave the test for this with the other guile lib tests. If we put it a

Re: ./configure

1998-11-20 Thread Jeremy Collins
Rob Browning wrote: > > Jeremy Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Just to let Rob, or whoever know... for me ./configure fails during the > > guile tests. A quick look at the config.log reveals that -lreadline was > > not linked in. Adding this to the ./configure script makes guile lin

more on configure.in

1998-11-20 Thread Jeremy Collins
Ok, adding the following lines to configure.in solved my problems: # Check for readline, and dl libs.. they are needed for guile AC_CHECK_LIB(readline, readline) AC_CHECK_LIB(dl, dlopen) -- Jeremy Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] - %< >% -- The GnuC

Re: Warning

1998-11-20 Thread Jeremy Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Could you just e-mail all of the pobox.com guys (with their pobox.com > account as the subject) and see which one bounces? > > All is fixed... only that one person was removed from the list... all is well... next.. -- Jeremy Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] - %<

Re: Compile/Gnome Version

1998-11-20 Thread Rob Browning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Robb has been moving around main() from one place to another, and inserting > all sorts of stuff in the middle. grep for main in the guile /scm source. Right. The C level main is in guile/gnucash.c. This does bootstrapping and then calls scm/startup/init.scm to loa

Re: Compile/Gnome Version

1998-11-20 Thread Rob Browning
Jeremy Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am getting closer... > > The Gnome version is really messed up... > > Here is my lastest problem, any ideas what I am missing here? I think I mentioned this to the list a while back, but it was a long time ago, and it was part of my patch announce

Re: ./configure

1998-11-20 Thread Rob Browning
Jeremy Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just to let Rob, or whoever know... for me ./configure fails during the > guile tests. A quick look at the config.log reveals that -lreadline was > not linked in. Adding this to the ./configure script makes guile link, > and thus configure succeeds.

Re: I give up (Re: GNOME gnucash building)

1998-11-20 Thread Rob Browning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > on my system it did not specify -ldl which is needed for guile. > also, during checking -lm wasn't included, so *all*checks failed because > math functions were missing ... I looked at your changes, and they look right, but could you move the new test block to the en

Re: I give up (Re: GNOME gnucash building)

1998-11-20 Thread linas
Hi All, It's been rumoured that Rob Browning said: > > Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I want to use it but also make sure that it runs well against LessTif > > and maybe also contribute. > > > > Also I'm on FreeBSD not Linux. > > I just sent linas another patch. Once that's in

Re: ./configure

1998-11-20 Thread linas
It's been rumoured that Jeremy Collins said: > > Just to let Rob, or whoever know... for me ./configure fails during the > guile tests. A quick look at the config.log reveals that -lreadline was > not linked in. Adding this to the ./configure script makes guile link, > and thus configure succe

Re: Compile/Gnome Version

1998-11-20 Thread linas
It's been rumoured that Jeremy Collins said: > > I am getting closer... > > The Gnome version is really messed up... > > Here is my lastest problem, any ideas what I am missing here? > > > ../guile/obj/gnucash.o: In function `main': > ../guile/obj/gnucash.o(.text+0x3c8): multiple definition o

Compile/Gnome Version

1998-11-20 Thread Jeremy Collins
I am getting closer... The Gnome version is really messed up... Here is my lastest problem, any ideas what I am missing here? ../guile/obj/gnucash.o: In function `main': ../guile/obj/gnucash.o(.text+0x3c8): multiple definition of `main' obj/gnome/main.o:/home/collins/devel/xacc/src/gnome/main.

./configure

1998-11-20 Thread Jeremy Collins
Just to let Rob, or whoever know... for me ./configure fails during the guile tests. A quick look at the config.log reveals that -lreadline was not linked in. Adding this to the ./configure script makes guile link, and thus configure succeeds. Is this what all this guile discussion was on? I

Re: I give up (Re: GNOME gnucash building)

1998-11-20 Thread Rob Browning
Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I want to use it but also make sure that it runs well against LessTif > and maybe also contribute. > > Also I'm on FreeBSD not Linux. I just sent linas another patch. Once that's incorporated (cross your fingers), I think most of the uglier build probl

Re: I give up (Re: GNOME gnucash building)

1998-11-20 Thread Danny Backx
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It's been rumoured that Danny Backx said: > > I'll just have to give up on GnuCash. > > Have you tried using the precompiled version? > Or are you trying to compile because you want to do development? I want to use it but also make sure that it runs well against LessTi

Re: Motif compilation - success; running get guile stack overflow

1998-11-20 Thread Rob Browning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I tried hacking around this but everything I tried didn't work. > Any ideas? Don't waste any more time. I've got it fixed. I'll send a patch soon. -- Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930 - %< -

Re: libtermcap and guile

1998-11-20 Thread Rob Browning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I'm running guile 1.3 and I don't have qthreads and it works fine. I think it proabably depends on whether or not you compiled guile with threads support. If you did, then I think it needs qthreads. > > We need one more case that has -lqthread and no -ltermcap. > >

Re: Warning

1998-11-20 Thread Jeremy Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It's been rumoured that Jeremy Collins said: > > There is a valid reason for this... > > Inquiring minds want to know ... Ok, basically... I am getting bounced messages from this persons real email address. But the bounced messages don't tell me his pobox.com addre

Re: libtermcap and guile

1998-11-20 Thread Amos Shapira
On Thu, November 19 1998, Ron Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |It seems to me that we can just unconditionally add -ltermcap to the |configure. For those platforms that don't need it, it shouldn't hurt |(linker won't include and objects from it, right?) At least with Debian, there is no libt