Neil Williams schrieb:
Can this workaround now be removed?
The change is over 2 years old:
http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-patches/2003-January/011451.html
FC3 appears to have automake1.9 and the problem would appear to be long fixed.
Do you mean the lines copied below from
Derek Atkins schrieb:
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My only problem with that on Debian is this build-within-a-build in cashutil
branch. I need to be able to hook cashutil/configure onto the end
of ./configure in a wrapper script that passes on the --prefix and nothing
else.
You
On Monday 07 November 2005 12:56 am, Derek Atkins wrote:
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My only problem with that on Debian is this build-within-a-build in
cashutil branch. I need to be able to hook cashutil/configure onto the
end of ./configure in a wrapper script that passes on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Williams wrote:
| On Monday 07 November 2005 12:56 am, Derek Atkins wrote:
|
|Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
|My only problem with that on Debian is this build-within-a-build in
|cashutil branch. I need to be able to hook
On Monday 07 November 2005 12:55 pm, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Neil Williams wrote:
| On Monday 07 November 2005 12:56 am, Derek Atkins wrote:
|Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|My only problem with that on Debian is this build-within-a-build in
|cashutil branch. I need to be able to hook
Neil Williams schrieb:
Then main discussion of that change happened on IRC
I hate IRC - it's all the things I dislike about the telephone with none of
the benefits of email. It's intrusive (you have to be online when others are
online), it's invasive (it interrupts me in the middle of other
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 11:58 +, Neil Williams wrote:
But then I can't have a separate po directory. How can gnucash and cashutil
be
packaged separately if they use the same translation files? I also use a
different manpage system, have vastly reduced numbers of dependencies and
Ok, since my first try at autogen.sh simplification led to some
unexpected problems, I'll now propose the changes before I try to commit
these again.
Firstly, I'd propose to remove the AM_MAINTAINER_MODE macro from
configure.in. This will basically turn on --enable-maintainer-mode
behaviour
Neil Williams schrieb:
My only problem with that on Debian is this build-within-a-build in
cashutil branch.
You shouldn't use a build-within-a-build. You should integrate
the cashutil dirs into the main configure script.
But then I can't have a separate po directory.
Agreed, at least
On Monday 07 November 2005 1:13 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
Neil Williams schrieb:
so I assumed that after cleaning up this script good
enough then it should work for all circumstances. Sorry if that is not
the case.
Not yet. I find it unsatisfactory that this change has forced me to
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 14:28 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
Ok, since my first try at autogen.sh simplification led to some
unexpected problems, I'll now propose the changes before I try to commit
these again.
Thanks you for working on this. I like the simplified autogen.sh, and
the only
E did you remove and add them? Why on earth didn't you use
svn move? ...?
Could you PLEASE remove the newly added files and instead svn move the
existing files from src/engine to libqof/qof so that we can keep the
file history? Or did I miss something here?
Christian
Neil Williams
On Monday 07 November 2005 4:04 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
Is there any particular reason the libqof move wasn't /ONE/ changeset?
To separate the Makefile.am changes from the simply copying of the files. I
didn't want people to have to sift through a 1Mb diff to find what's been
changed in
On Monday 07 November 2005 4:08 pm, Josh Sled wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 15:50 +, Neil Williams wrote:
The files are in now and I'm testing.
I'll commit the ChangeLog only when complete.
I thought you were going to do this on a branch... was I mistaken?
I said, if preferred I
Neil Williams schrieb:
Is there any particular reason the libqof move wasn't /ONE/ changeset?
To separate the Makefile.am changes from the simply copying of the files. I
didn't want people to have to sift through a 1Mb diff to find what's been
changed in configure.in or
On Monday 07 November 2005 4:15 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
E did you remove and add them?
Because of the svn accident - I lost the entire move half way through. I had
used svn move originally but then it went wrong with all the temporary files
and I had no originals to move.
Could
Neil Williams schrieb:
Could you PLEASE remove the newly added files and instead svn move the
existing files from src/engine to libqof/qof so that we can keep the
file history? Or did I miss something here?
What if I use svn move on the cashutil branch - won't we then get the history
back
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 15:50 +, Neil Williams wrote:
The files are in now and I'm testing.
I'll commit the ChangeLog only when complete.
I thought you were going to do this on a branch... was I mistaken?
Why didn't you do this as a single commit/changeset?
...jsled
--
Quoting Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 07 November 2005 4:36 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
Neil Williams schrieb:
Is there any particular reason the libqof move wasn't /ONE/ changeset?
To separate the Makefile.am changes from the simply copying of the files.
I didn't want people
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 16:58 +, Neil Williams wrote:
Probably a bad idea to begin with. If people want to know the changes in
Makefile.am, they will use svn diff Makefile.am.
Well, that's what someone asked for so that's what I tried to do.
Hmm... what was asked for, exactly?
I
On Monday 07 November 2005 5:07 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
Who asked for that? I've asked for emailed-in patches to be small..
But who ever said that SVN commits should be small? SVN commits
should be functionally-complete objects.
OK, understood. (The request was probably from the cvs time -
On Monday 07 November 2005 5:23 pm, Josh Sled wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 16:58 +, Neil Williams wrote:
* revert all of these changes
svn is still new to me (all of us?) and it'd be nice to have an example
command for that. svn revert doesn't seem to do the job without locally
modified
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Author: codehelp
Date: 2005-11-07 07:27:15 -0500 (Mon, 07 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 11876
Modified:
gnucash/trunk/Makefile.am
Log:
oops
For the future... Can you try to have more details log
messages than oops. It doesn't really explain what
you
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 17:29 +, Neil Williams wrote:
On Monday 07 November 2005 5:07 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
Who asked for that? I've asked for emailed-in patches to be small..
But who ever said that SVN commits should be small? SVN commits
should be functionally-complete objects.
For what it's worth, with Peter O. and Neil W.'s chatter as a guide,
I succeeded in building r11850 on my Mac. It does run, opens my 5MB
1.8.11 data file (copy), though Save As isn't working, and the x11
terminal complains:
(gnucash:24902): Gtk-WARNING **: Could not find the icon
This weekend, working on the simplified payroll calculator, I have found
more options and even more questions. For internationalizing I've added
sub classes us to the payroll and tax structures.
However, while investigating the 2005 forms issued from the
http://irs.gov, I found that we can sign
i tried to check out from repo
with anonymous access as adviced but i get this error
what went wrong...
please help
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/pawan/gnucash # svn checkout http://svn.gnucash.org/repo/gnucash/trunk gnucash
svn: REPORT request failed on '/repo/!svn/bc/11887/gnucash/trunk'
On Monday 07 November 2005 10:19 pm, someone claiming to be Pawan Chitrakar
wrote:
i tried to check out from repo
with anonymous access as adviced but i get this error
what went wrong...
please help
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/pawan/gnucash # svn checkout
Hi,
I recently developed a paper personal expense budget. It involved reviewing
past expenses utilizing gnucash 1.8.11 reports, some cumulative
categorization, and a monthly estimate of expenditures, including those
expenditures that do not occur monthly.
I figured this was as good a time as
[Tim, this is just a quick reply.]
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 11:38:55PM -0500, Tim Wunder wrote:
Hi,
I recently developed a paper personal expense budget. It involved reviewing
past expenses utilizing gnucash 1.8.11 reports, some cumulative
categorization, and a monthly estimate of
30 matches
Mail list logo
