On Apr 2, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> On Tue, April 2, 2013 4:34 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>
That would explain why the build failed with the same error.
I deleted the old 2.5.0 tree and reran the build yet again,
but I suspect it might fail again
>>>
>>
On Tue, April 2, 2013 4:34 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>>>
>>> That would explain why the build failed with the same error.
>>> I deleted the old 2.5.0 tree and reran the build yet again,
>>> but I suspect it might fail again
>>
>> I've just committed the tag again, this time hopefully correct.
Hi,
I have been trying to build GnuCash on Windows and hit quite a few issues
on the way.
I notice that there are two places where there are details on how to build
on Windows as follows:
Onc is
http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Windows#Instructions_for_an_.28almost.29_automated_build
The other is t
On Apr 2, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guy's,
>
> I thought 2.5.0 was being released in mid April so was not checking
> activity. I have several blocker bugs with patches on them that may be a
> good idea for this release or .1 the last containing a patch to c
Hi Guy's,
I thought 2.5.0 was being released in mid April so was not checking
activity. I have several blocker bugs with patches on them that may be a
good idea for this release or .1 the last containing a patch to check old
and new registers being opened at the same time which I think was mention
On Tue, April 2, 2013 4:21 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 16:17:49 schrieb Derek Atkins:
>> On Tue, April 2, 2013 4:08 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
>> > Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 13:41:38 schrieb John Ralls:
>> >> Author: jralls
>> >> Date: 2013-04-02 13:41:37 -0400
On Apr 2, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 16:17:49 schrieb Derek Atkins:
>> On Tue, April 2, 2013 4:08 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
>>> Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 13:41:38 schrieb John Ralls:
Author: jralls
Date: 2013-04-02 13:41:37 -0400 (Tu
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 16:17:49 schrieb Derek Atkins:
> On Tue, April 2, 2013 4:08 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 13:41:38 schrieb John Ralls:
> >> Author: jralls
> >> Date: 2013-04-02 13:41:37 -0400 (Tue, 02 Apr 2013)
> >> New Revision: 22865
> >> Trac: http://s
On Tue, April 2, 2013 4:08 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 13:41:38 schrieb John Ralls:
>> Author: jralls
>> Date: 2013-04-02 13:41:37 -0400 (Tue, 02 Apr 2013)
>> New Revision: 22865
>> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/22865
>>
>> Added:
>>gnucash/tags/2.
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 13:41:38 schrieb John Ralls:
> Author: jralls
> Date: 2013-04-02 13:41:37 -0400 (Tue, 02 Apr 2013)
> New Revision: 22865
> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/22865
>
> Added:
>gnucash/tags/2.5.0/trunk/
I think there's one "trunk" too much in here. You prob
On Tue, April 2, 2013 1:44 pm, John Ralls wrote:
> ISTM we'll want one more 2.4 release this summer, so it would be good to
> get it fixed. Do we know for sure that what's wrong there isn't also
> broken on trunk/2.5?
Actually, I was wrong. The 2.4 branch build did copy over. Mea Culpa. I
was
On Tue, April 2, 2013 1:44 pm, John Ralls wrote:
> OK, Retagged. I'll proceed with everything else this afternoon -- I have
> to go to an appointment now.
That's fine. I'll fire it off if I get the chance, or just let it fire
itself tonight..
> ISTM we'll want one more 2.4 release this summer,
On Apr 2, 2013, at 10:36 AM, "Derek Atkins" wrote:
>
> On Tue, April 2, 2013 12:57 pm, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 2, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>
>>> Christian Stimming writes:
>>>
Zitat von Derek Atkins :
>> Triggered, and it definitely made it past the gnome step
On Tue, April 2, 2013 12:57 pm, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Apr 2, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>> Christian Stimming writes:
>>
>>> Zitat von Derek Atkins :
> Triggered, and it definitely made it past the gnome step. Right now
> it's building the gnucash code itself so I would
On Apr 2, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Christian Stimming writes:
>
>> Zitat von Derek Atkins :
Triggered, and it definitely made it past the gnome step. Right now
it's building the gnucash code itself so I would call it progress.
If this succeeds then we proba
Christian Stimming writes:
> Zitat von Derek Atkins :
>>> Triggered, and it definitely made it past the gnome step. Right now
>>> it's building the gnucash code itself so I would call it progress.
>>>
>>> If this succeeds then we probably need to re-tag 2.5.0. I'll keep an
>>> eye out and send
Zitat von Derek Atkins :
Triggered, and it definitely made it past the gnome step. Right now
it's building the gnucash code itself so I would call it progress.
If this succeeds then we probably need to re-tag 2.5.0. I'll keep an
eye out and send another message.
FYI, trunk seems to have buil
Derek Atkins writes:
>> Ok, r22864 is the next try. In February, the pixman installation was
>> removed, but one final check for it still remained.
>>
>> Can you trigger the build again? No need to remove anything tho.
>>
>> Christian
>
> Triggered, and it definitely made it past the gnome step.
Christian Stimming writes:
> Zitat von Derek Atkins :
>
>>> @Derek: Can you remove the c:\soft\gnome directory and trigger the
>>> normal build manually? If the gnome directory has a problem, we will
>>> see the same error in the normal build's output then.
>>
>> Yep, just did that and look, it f
Zitat von Derek Atkins :
@Derek: Can you remove the c:\soft\gnome directory and trigger the
normal build manually? If the gnome directory has a problem, we will
see the same error in the normal build's output then.
Yep, just did that and look, it failed. :) The error was slightly
different,
Geert Janssens writes:
> On zo 31 mrt 2013 23:06:12 EDT, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>> Looks like the 2.4.12 build finished, built the setup, but still "failed"
>> and didn't copy the .exe or build log to the server. The end of the log
>> file says:
>>
>> Shutdown error: Failed: Failure shutting do
Christian Stimming writes:
> Zitat von Derek Atkins :
>>> As for the 2.5.0 tag: You've removed the line from the correct tag file. I
>>> don't know why it didn't run. I did the same thing a few minutes ago: I
>>> removed the 2.5.0 line from the file c:\soft\packaging\tags and ran the
>>> build_ta
Zitat von Derek Atkins :
As for the 2.5.0 tag: You've removed the line from the correct tag file. I
don't know why it didn't run. I did the same thing a few minutes ago: I
removed the 2.5.0 line from the file c:\soft\packaging\tags and ran the
build_tags.sh script in that directory manually. It'
23 matches
Mail list logo
