What about this question?
On a related note, is it expected that an already-cleared transactions
should appear in the list of matches, if the "Enable update match action"
option isn't on? It seems that it shouldn't but maybe I don't quite
understand the match logic...
Jean
--
Sent from:
Hi John,
cd /home/cgood/gnucash-master/build
cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=debug -G"Eclipse CDT4 - Ninja"
-DCMAKE_ECLIPSE_GENERATE_SOURCE_PROJECT=TRUE
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../install ../src
as per https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Eclipse#With_CMake_.26_Ninja
repo is /home/cgood/gnucash-master/src
> On May 6, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Jean Laroche wrote:
>
>> It occurs to me that perhaps matching should be separated into two separate
>> dialogs, perhaps wrapped in an assistant: The first one would match
>> already-entered transactions and the second would run the account matcher on
>> the
It occurs to me that perhaps matching should be separated into two separate
dialogs, perhaps wrapped in an assistant: The first one would match
already-entered transactions and the second would run the account matcher on
the remaining unmatched ones. That would simplify both the UI and the
> On May 6, 2020, at 1:24 PM, jeanl wrote:
>
> Devs,
> I'm looking into
> http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GNC-Import-matcher-shortcomings-OFX-realm-at-least-td4718489.html
> where many similar transactions in an OFX file can be matched to the same
> existing transaction in the register.
Devs,
I'm looking into
http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GNC-Import-matcher-shortcomings-OFX-realm-at-least-td4718489.html
where many similar transactions in an OFX file can be matched to the same
existing transaction in the register.
I don't see any code to detect this situation in the
> On May 5, 2020, at 4:32 PM, Mike Alexander wrote:
>
> I tried the XCode project on the master branch this afternoon and the build
> failed because there was no rule to build
> libgnucash/core-utils/gnc-vcs-info.h. When I copied it from another recent
> build directory everything worked
> On May 5, 2020, at 9:58 PM, Chris Good wrote:
>
>
>
> Does anyone else have some input?
>
> If this is going to be ready for GnuCash 4.0 due 20 June 2020, I need to get
> started ASAP. Otherwise, it
>
> won’t be available till 5.0 which is not listed in
>
Are you setting CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH on the cmake command line? Better yet, what's
the whole cmake command line that you're using?
Regards,
John Ralls
> On May 5, 2020, at 9:26 PM, Chris Good wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Ralls
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 May 2020 1:30 PM
> To:
Hey Mike,
Actually, I wasn’t trying to offer advice, but seeking information. Like I
said I gave up recently on building a fresh version of the GC prerequisites and
was perhaps looking for assistance in building them in the case that you had
just recently done this.
Chris
> On May 5, 2020,
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 00:20, John Ralls wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, but no version of SWIG would alter the Text in a Comment within the
> > file
> > it was processing, or would it?
> >
> > I wasn't aware of SWIG having any "automatic" spell-correction capability
> > but I could imagine that it might
Hi,
I have started to create
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Documentation_Requirements because I
think, the bug report together with mails on several lists are becoming
muddled.
In a first step we should collect required and desired criterias.
In a secound step we should see which source
12 matches
Mail list logo
