Re: [GNC-dev] Proposal: Scheduling string freeze 2 weeks before each release

2020-12-01 Thread Pedro Albuquerque
Hi, +1 Regards, Pedro Albuquerque On 01/12/20 22:08, Frank H. Ellenberger wrote: > Dear coders and translators, > > watching translations often arrive short after a release is frustrating. > But translators often do not know, when they should start tp cover all > changes. > > If we schedule a st

[GNC-dev] Proposal: Scheduling string freeze 2 weeks before each release

2020-12-01 Thread Frank H. Ellenberger
Dear coders and translators, watching translations often arrive short after a release is frustrating. But translators often do not know, when they should start tp cover all changes. If we schedule a string freeze 2 weeks before each release, coders have still two and a half month to apply changes

Re: [GNC-dev] Wiki Proposal

2018-08-17 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi, "David T. via gnucash-devel" writes: [snip] > In reference to editing the "XML Format” wiki page, Geert mentioned > preferring that the wiki cover information about the current release > and one or two previous releases. > > I personally agree with that idea; it would give a clear guideline

[GNC-dev] Wiki Proposal

2018-08-16 Thread David T. via gnucash-devel
Sorry to bombard the list with so many messages! As you’ve no doubt surmised, I am back to digging into the various documentation for GnuCash, including the Guide and the wiki. In reference to editing the "XML Format” wiki page, Geert mentioned preferring that the wiki cover information about

Re: Building 2.8 on Ubuntu 16.04 - Wiki Proposal

2017-09-07 Thread Carsten Rinke
On 07.09.2017 12:38, Geert Janssens wrote: On donderdag 7 september 2017 10:58:30 CEST Carsten Rinke wrote: Hi there, starting with an Ubuntu 16.04 installation from scratch, this is what I did to make GnuCash 2.8 build with autotools: Nice! autogen.sh: === sudo apt-get install in

Re: Building 2.8 on Ubuntu 16.04 - Wiki Proposal

2017-09-07 Thread Geert Janssens
On donderdag 7 september 2017 10:58:30 CEST Carsten Rinke wrote: > Hi there, > > starting with an Ubuntu 16.04 installation from scratch, this is what I > did to make GnuCash 2.8 build with autotools: > Nice! > autogen.sh: > === > sudo apt-get install intltool > sudo apt-get install auto

Building 2.8 on Ubuntu 16.04 - Wiki Proposal

2017-09-07 Thread Carsten Rinke
Hi there, starting with an Ubuntu 16.04 installation from scratch, this is what I did to make GnuCash 2.8 build with autotools: autogen.sh: === sudo apt-get install intltool sudo apt-get install autoconf automake autotools-dev libsigsegv2 m4 sudo apt-get install libtool libltdl-dev sud

Re: Win-10 lockups (was Re: Branching proposal for 2.7.x)

2017-08-28 Thread Derek Atkins
On Mon, August 28, 2017 10:03 am, John Ralls wrote: > >> On Aug 28, 2017, at 5:07 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: >> >> John Ralls writes: >> >>> We're almost ready to release 2.7.0, I just need to figure out why the >>> build script locks up the Win10 VM build server. >> >> If we can figure this out, t

Re: Win-10 lockups (was Re: Branching proposal for 2.7.x)

2017-08-28 Thread John Ralls
> On Aug 28, 2017, at 5:07 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > > John Ralls writes: > >> We're almost ready to release 2.7.0, I just need to figure out why the >> build script locks up the Win10 VM build server. > > If we can figure this out, that would be useful. Are we sure it's the > build script?

Win-10 lockups (was Re: Branching proposal for 2.7.x)

2017-08-28 Thread Derek Atkins
John Ralls writes: > We're almost ready to release 2.7.0, I just need to figure out why the > build script locks up the Win10 VM build server. If we can figure this out, that would be useful. Are we sure it's the build script? Can you reliably reproduce it? If so, maybe I can watch the VM log

Re: Branching proposal for 2.7.x

2017-08-27 Thread Geert Janssens
That's a good proposal. Go for it. Regards, Geert John Ralls schreef op 26 augustus 2017 23:02:53 CEST: >We're almost ready to release 2.7.0, I just need to figure out why the >build script locks up the Win10 VM build server. > >I propose to create an "unstable&qu

Re: Branching proposal for 2.7.x

2017-08-26 Thread Aaron Laws
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 5:02 PM, John Ralls wrote: > We're almost ready to release 2.7.0, I just need to figure out why the > build script locks up the Win10 VM build server. > > I propose to create an "unstable" branch and release the 2.7.x series from > that, so all 2.7.x bug fixes and any rema

Branching proposal for 2.7.x

2017-08-26 Thread John Ralls
We're almost ready to release 2.7.0, I just need to figure out why the build script locks up the Win10 VM build server. I propose to create an "unstable" branch and release the 2.7.x series from that, so all 2.7.x bug fixes and any remaining work for the 2.8.x would go to that branch; long-term

Re: Backport proposal for "Attached file indicator"

2016-09-13 Thread Alex Aycinena
> > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: John Ralls > To: Derek Atkins > Cc: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 08:19:45 -0700 > Subject: Re: Backport proposal for "Attached file indicator" > > > On Sep 13, 2016, at

Re: Backport proposal for "Attached file indicator"

2016-09-13 Thread John Ralls
> On Sep 13, 2016, at 7:37 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > > Geert, > > Geert Janssens writes: > >> Robert Fewell recently contributed work to the master branch to add a >> visual indicator to transactions when a file/uri is attached, and some >> further refinements in that area. >> >> There is

Re: Backport proposal for "Attached file indicator"

2016-09-13 Thread Derek Atkins
Geert, Geert Janssens writes: > Robert Fewell recently contributed work to the master branch to add a > visual indicator to transactions when a file/uri is attached, and some > further refinements in that area. > > There is an enhancement request for this in bugzilla as well [1] > > While our

Re: Backport proposal for "Attached file indicator"

2016-09-13 Thread Christian Stimming
Good idea. No objections. Feel free to go ahead with useful back ports. Thanks! Christian > Am 13.09.2016 um 12:30 schrieb Geert Janssens : > > Robert Fewell recently contributed work to the master branch to add a > visual indicator to transactions when a file/uri is attached, and some > furt

Backport proposal for "Attached file indicator"

2016-09-13 Thread Geert Janssens
Robert Fewell recently contributed work to the master branch to add a visual indicator to transactions when a file/uri is attached, and some further refinements in that area. There is an enhancement request for this in bugzilla as well [1] While our policy states new features should be added on

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-25 Thread Cristian Marchi
Thanks for the abstract. The word is spreading on google+! Il 24/04/2012 22:06, Ngewi Fet ha scritto: Hi Cristian, thanks. Here is a short (edited) version of the abstract. Let me know if you need anything else. The goal of this proposal is the development of a GNUcash Android

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-24 Thread Ngewi Fet
Hi Cristian, thanks. Here is a short (edited) version of the abstract. Let me know if you need anything else. The goal of this proposal is the development of a GNUcash Android > application which allows users to track expenses on-the-go and later on > import the expenses into the desktop v

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-24 Thread Cristian Marchi
] http://goo.gl/mESr1 Il 24/04/2012 1.45, Ngewi Fet ha scritto: I just got the mail that my proposal was accepted to GSOC 2012. Thanks to the mentors and the community for the support through the application process. I am looking forward to the coding work ahead. Cheers, Ngewi On Tue, Apr 10

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-24 Thread Muslim Chochlov
Great news, Ngewi! Welcome aboard. Regards, Muslim Chochlov ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-23 Thread John Ralls
On Apr 23, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Ngewi Fet wrote: > I just got the mail that my proposal was accepted to GSOC 2012. > Thanks to the mentors and the community for the support through the > application process. > > I am looking forward to the coding work ahead. Congratulations

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-23 Thread Ngewi Fet
I just got the mail that my proposal was accepted to GSOC 2012. Thanks to the mentors and the community for the support through the application process. I am looking forward to the coding work ahead. Cheers, Ngewi On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 22:57, John Ralls wrote: > > On Apr 10, 2012, a

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-10 Thread John Ralls
ally well. With this code example, I'd say > you have a very very high chance to succeed with your complete proposal! > Thanks a lot. Christian, I took the liberty of copying the first paragraph to a comment on Ngewi's proposal for the benefit of the Gnome folks. I hope you

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-10 Thread Ngewi Fet
;ve read, general performance seems to still be an issue (although improving) So no, I am not enthusiastic about developing with PhoneGap or any other framework (although I must admit that I am partial to a native UI look than to generic looking apps). > @Ngewi, add github code link to

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-10 Thread Christian Stimming
nning very quickly. You should then be able to ensure that the interfacing between the Android app and the actual gnucash data file works really well. With this code example, I'd say you have a very very high chance to succeed with your complete proposal! Thanks a lot. Regards, Christian

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-10 Thread Muslim Chochlov
se tracker application. There should not be a problem with storage or ui, but could be with intents. Here are a few links to get started [1] [2] [3]. @Ngewi, add github code link to your proposal in Melange. You should still be able to edit it, if not just paste it into comments. [1] http://stackove

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-09 Thread Ngewi Fet
After doing a crash course in QFX, I have written a small module for outputting expenses in the OFX format which was proposed as a better alternative to the QIF format. The code can be found here: https://github.com/codinguser/OfxModule I am grateful for any feedback. Cheers, Ngewi On Sat, Apr 7

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-09 Thread Colin Law
On 9 April 2012 15:48, AshokR wrote: > Hi Muslim et al, > > One possibility you might want to consider is the open source Apache Cordova > (formerly PhoneGap) framework.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhoneGap See > the supported platforms/devices here. > > 1. Single code base - multiple platforms/

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-09 Thread AshokR
Symbian or other devices, in future. Regards, Ashok -- View this message in context: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GSoC-Android-proposal-tp4536061p4542946.html Sent from the GnuCash - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ gnucash-devel mailing

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-09 Thread Ngewi Fet
8, 2012 at 21:31, Muslim Chochlov wrote: > Hi, > > As for the part "How do you plan to achieve completion of your project?", >> I >> assumed that that was the part where the proposal was to be entered. >> Because the next sentence just seems to add detail t

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-08 Thread Muslim Chochlov
Hi, As for the part "How do you plan to achieve completion of your project?", I > assumed that that was the part where the proposal was to be entered. > Because the next sentence just seems to add detail to the question "It > really helps to see a schedule with dates an

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-07 Thread John Ralls
On Apr 6, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Ngewi Fet wrote: > Hi John, > I have done some C/C++ programming, but it has been a while since I did > coding in the language. > I have checked out out the Gnucash code and I am looking at the bug tracker > too. > Hopefully I will be able to make a contribution s

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-06 Thread Ngewi Fet
entionally. > > > > > I shouldn't have included Muslim's rather frank evaluation of Ngewi's > proposal vs. the other proposals already submitted to Gnome, and I > apologize for exposing that to the community. > > That said, the discussion with prospective

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-06 Thread Ngewi Fet
Hi, Thanks for the feedback. I will make some modifications to the application to add specificity and edit the schedule. As for the part "How do you plan to achieve completion of your project?", I assumed that that was the part where the proposal was to be entered. Because the next sen

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-06 Thread John Ralls
On Apr 6, 2012, at 8:12 AM, Wm Tarr wrote: > On 2012-04-06 15:49, John Ralls wrote: >> There's no requirement that the contribution be related to the student's >> proposal -- but Ngewi, if you don't know C or Scheme well enough to fix a >> bug, we need to fi

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-06 Thread Wm Tarr
On 2012-04-06 15:49, John Ralls wrote: There's no requirement that the contribution be related to the student's proposal -- but Ngewi, if you don't know C or Scheme well enough to fix a bug, we need to figure out something else that you can do. The more folks involved in bra

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-06 Thread John Ralls
as well, but also violates GSoC program rules. Apart of > that > it makes me and I guess students feel quite uncomfortable. > I really hope this was done by a mistake and unintentionally. > I shouldn't have included Muslim's rather frank evaluation of Ngewi's proposal

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-06 Thread Muslim Chochlov
rrectly you have a time until 20th of April to come up with a code contribution, that is you can later add a link in a comment to your proposal. Two weeks should be more than enough to fix a bug, write a test or do small refactoring. Most relevant modules would be src/import-export or src/libqof.

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-06 Thread Ngewi Fet
4, 2012, at 8:00 AM, Muslim Chochlov wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> The good news are that one student (Ngewi Fet) has submitted his > proposal for mobile application. > >> And AFAIK another one (Atul) is going to submit as well. > >> The bad news

Re: GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-05 Thread David Reiser
On Apr 5, 2012, at 5:02 PM, John Ralls wrote: > > On Apr 4, 2012, at 8:00 AM, Muslim Chochlov wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The good news are that one student (Ngewi Fet) has submitted his proposal >> for mobile application. >> And AFAIK another one (Atul) is g

GSoC Android proposal

2012-04-05 Thread John Ralls
On Apr 4, 2012, at 8:00 AM, Muslim Chochlov wrote: > Hi, > > The good news are that one student (Ngewi Fet) has submitted his proposal for > mobile application. > And AFAIK another one (Atul) is going to submit as well. > The bad news are that Ngewi's proposal doesn&#x

Re: Hi ... proposal for Bug #336843

2011-04-17 Thread Mohammad Keshmiri
Thanks a lot Christian, Looking forward to getting my first patch ready! Cheers, Mohammad On 18/04/11 6:09 AM, Christian Stimming wrote: Dear Mohammed, welcome to our project! Your ideas sound very good and would fit very well into our project. _

Re: Hi ... proposal for Bug #336843

2011-04-17 Thread Christian Stimming
Dear Mohammed, welcome to our project! Your ideas sound very good and would fit very well into our project. As you guessed correctly, indeed nobody is working on this issue right now. In addition to the bugzilla item, the same feature request is also noted in the uservoice website, http://g

Hi ... proposal for Bug #336843

2011-04-17 Thread Mohammad Keshmiri
Hi Everyone, My name is Mohammad and I am currently doing my masters in computing at the Australian National University. As part of a course on FOSS development (taught by Dr Andrew Tridgell and Bob Edwards) we are required to involve and contribute to a FOSS project of our choice. For anyone

Re: GSoC:Business Integration Final Proposal

2011-04-09 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Freitag, 8. April 2011 schrieb Ravi Sethia: > Hi, > > Finally was unable to complete the whole documentation.Attached is the file > of final submission.I guess I was late in finding Gnu Cash. > Please see and reply. Your application is too late, as the deadline was announced and known long ag

Re: GSOC 2011 Proposal :GnuCash Business Integration

2011-04-08 Thread John Ralls
or using C++ as part of assignment > > *4.8085 Assembler > * > > - *A *simple two pass assembler in C as part of assignment. > > > I have also taken relevant courses in the as part of my curriculum in my 2 > years. > > - C++ and Data Structures > - Intro

GSOC 2011 Proposal :GnuCash Business Integration

2011-04-08 Thread Ravi Sethia
late to contact the mailing list but I have prepared a proposal just need the final help from some of you regarding my ideas and GSoC application.Thanks in advance for the help Regards, Ravi Sethia 2nd Year Undergarduate(B.Tech) Dept. of CSE IIT Guwahati India +91-9678-55-4844

GSOC 2011 Proposal :GnuCash Business Integration

2011-04-08 Thread Ravi Sethia
late to contact the mailing list but I have prepared a proposal just need the final help from some of you regarding my ideas and GSoC application.Thanks in advance for the help Regards, Ravi Sethia 2nd Year Undergarduate(B.Tech) Dept. of CSE IIT Guwahati India +91-9678-55-4844

Re: [GSoC Proposal] Python scripting and reporting project

2011-04-07 Thread Rohan Kulkarni
Hi, I have made modifications, added some new features, edited the code migration part. Below is not the whole proposal, only the goals and their detailed description. Goals: 1] Develop python scripts in gnucash to provide a python framework. To achieve the above goal, my aim is to focus

Re: [GSoC Proposal] Python scripting and reporting project

2011-04-06 Thread Christian Stimming
Dear Rohan, thanks for your detailed proposal about python scripting code. In general, your research is well-thought and goes into plenty of detail about how to migrate scheme code to python code. However, my statement from my previous email http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel

[GSoC Proposal] Python scripting and reporting project

2011-04-06 Thread Rohan Kulkarni
Hello, I have drafted a proposal for the above mentioned project. I have come up with this proposal based on what I could research and infer. There may be shortcomings in the content, its my humble request to comment on this for further improvement. Initially, I have listed down the goals

Re: Proposal for GSoC 2011

2011-04-06 Thread Ajay Thomas
Hi I have modified the proposal. I have also modified the mockups by changing the preferences.glade file in src/gnome-utils/glade/preferences.glade. Moreover, I feel the technology I most likely will be using is gtkmm widgets because it is a lot clearer than JavaScript and C code if any can be

Re: irc (An alternative GUI, a detailed proposal - GSOC 2011)

2011-04-05 Thread Leigh Honeywell
On 11-04-05 12:29 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: > Maybe we can set up an IRC relay for you to use? ;) I've found mibbit works quite nicely for this: http://mibbit.com/#gnuc...@irc.gnome.org :) -Leigh ps. I'm guessing by the ;) that there's an inside joke there, if so, please ignore :) __

Re: irc (An alternative GUI, a detailed proposal - GSOC 2011)

2011-04-05 Thread Derek Atkins
Christian Stimming writes: > Zitat von Derek Atkins : > Where did a suggestion from "jsled" come from? Josh left the project > some time ago (as usual in volunteer projects - there was not a > problem with this) so I guess the comment is probably rather old. If It came fr

Re: irc (An alternative GUI, a detailed proposal - GSOC 2011)

2011-04-05 Thread Christian Stimming
Zitat von Derek Atkins : > Where did a suggestion from "jsled" come from? Josh left the project > some time ago (as usual in volunteer projects - there was not a > problem with this) so I guess the comment is probably rather old. If It came from IRC. Josh still hangs around there. Thanks for

Re: An alternative GUI, a detailed proposal - GSOC 2011

2011-04-05 Thread Derek Atkins
Christian Stimming writes: > Am Montag, 4. April 2011 schrieb Derek Atkins: >> Christian Stimming writes: >> > Dear Nitish, >> > >> > Am Sonntag, 3. April 2011 schrieb Nitish Kumar: >> >> Thank you Christian, I have posted it on the GSoC website. >> >> >> >> *jsled talked about making regi

Re: An alternative GUI, a detailed proposal - GSOC 2011

2011-04-04 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Montag, 4. April 2011 schrieb Derek Atkins: > Christian Stimming writes: > > Dear Nitish, > > > > Am Sonntag, 3. April 2011 schrieb Nitish Kumar: > >> Thank you Christian, I have posted it on the GSoC website. > >> > >> *jsled talked about making registers default to auto-split. It does >

Re: An alternative GUI, a detailed proposal - GSOC 2011

2011-04-04 Thread Derek Atkins
Christian Stimming writes: > Dear Nitish, > > Am Sonntag, 3. April 2011 schrieb Nitish Kumar: >> Thank you Christian, I have posted it on the GSoC website. >> >> *jsled talked about making registers default to auto-split. It does >> give a clear picture by showing all the sub-transactions in

Re: Proposal for GSoC 2011

2011-04-03 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Sonntag, 3. April 2011 schrieb Ajay Thomas: > Hi Christian and others > > I have drafted my proposal for GSoC 2011. Please provide feedback and > suggestions for this proposal. I am sure there is always room for > improvement. Hoping to be a part of the developer team of GnuCa

Re: An alternative GUI, a detailed proposal - GSOC 2011

2011-04-03 Thread Christian Stimming
Dear Nitish, Am Sonntag, 3. April 2011 schrieb Nitish Kumar: > Thank you Christian, I have posted it on the GSoC website. > > *jsled talked about making registers default to auto-split. It does > give a clear picture by showing all the sub-transactions involved right > next to the main transa

Re: An alternative GUI, a detailed proposal - GSOC 2011

2011-04-03 Thread Nitish Kumar
sh On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Christian Stimming wrote: > Dear Nitish, > > the proposal looks very good: > - You explained your motivation sufficiently enough so that we know there > is a significant personal interest in having this implemented. > - You've explained sev

Re: An alternative GUI, a detailed proposal - GSOC 2011

2011-04-01 Thread Christian Stimming
Dear Nitish, the proposal looks very good: - You explained your motivation sufficiently enough so that we know there is a significant personal interest in having this implemented. - You've explained several consecutive goals, where the first (easy) ones will surely be completed withi

An alternative GUI, a detailed proposal - GSOC 2011

2011-03-31 Thread Nitish Kumar
l user. 2) Stick to it in the long run, to see it does make out to what it set out to be, an easy to use solid accounting system. Thank you for reading. The content presented here is based on what I could comprehend, research and analyse. I am sure there are lots of areas to improve upon. I would glad

Re: GSoC Proposal: Live news feed from financial newspapers

2011-03-31 Thread Christian Stimming
n use such a gnc-plugin-page.h but they don't have to. I am currently going through the src/optional/gtkmm. I also looked into the gnucash report renderer using webkit (src/html/gnc-html-webkit.c) and I have a small doubt regarding implementation of my proposal using webkit. Will it

Re: GSoC Proposal: Live news feed from financial newspapers

2011-03-30 Thread Ajay Thomas
under plugins but it still didn't answer my doubt. I am currently going through the src/optional/gtkmm. I also looked into the gnucash report renderer using webkit (src/html/gnc-html-webkit.c) and I have a small doubt regarding implementation of my proposal using webkit. Will it be codin

Re: GSoC Proposal: Live news feed from financial newspapers

2011-03-28 Thread Christian Stimming
t can > be integrated into the current code base of GnuCash. This sounds like a good overview. I think your basic idea will turn into a very nice project proposal, and as you go along, you can add more details to your proposal here. > I'll let you know of my progress and if I have

Re: GSoC Proposal: Live news feed from financial newspapers

2011-03-28 Thread Ajay Thomas
d > > not browse the net to search for news on stocks and finding out how his > > portfolio is performing etc. The news can be personalized according to > his > > needs which can be set by the user itself. > > > > Please give me your feedback on the proposal, I can

Re: GSoC Proposal: Live news feed from financial newspapers

2011-03-27 Thread Christian Stimming
or gnucash. Thus, the user need > not browse the net to search for news on stocks and finding out how his > portfolio is performing etc. The news can be personalized according to his > needs which can be set by the user itself. > > Please give me your feedback on the propo

GSoC Proposal: Live news feed from financial newspapers

2011-03-27 Thread Ajay Thomas
. Please give me your feedback on the proposal, I can work on the timeline and implementation accordingly. -- Ajay Thomas IRC Nick: jay_t II Year, Computer Science Engg. NITK Surathkal Karnataka <http://www.myvirtualconfessions.blogspot.com/> ___ g

GSoC Proposal: Live news feed from financial newspapers

2011-03-26 Thread Ajay Thomas
. Please give me your feedback on the proposal, I can work on the timeline and implementation accordingly. -- Ajay Thomas II Year, Comp. Sc. Engg. NITK Surathkal Karnataka <http://www.myvirtualconfessions.blogspot.com/> ___ gnucash-devel mailing list g

Re: Idea proposal - Google Summer of code 2011

2011-03-24 Thread Christian Stimming
Dienstag, 22. März 2011 schrieb akash mehrotra: > I would like to propose an additional idea for GSoC 2011. > This is a very abstract proposal, as I have not yet used GNUCash or seen > the source, so I do not know if its practical to implement it. Please do > tell me if its practical, I

Re: 2.4 branch created (Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now)

2011-03-22 Thread Geert Janssens
On maandag 21 maart 2011, Stephen Brown wrote: > Hi Derek, Geert & Christian > At the moment I am successfully building under Microsoft Vista whatever the > install.sh build scripts build, > which If I understand > what is being said in this thread correctly is the stable version. I want > to devel

Re: 2.4 branch created (Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now)

2011-03-22 Thread Geert Janssens
On maandag 21 maart 2011, Derek Atkins wrote: > Geert Janssens writes: > > Yay ! > > > > I'm a bit busy right now, but later this week I'll push some of the > > developments I have been working on (guile 1.8, gnome-druid > > replacement,...). > > A couple to-dos: > > 1) Make the 2.4 branch win3

Idea proposal - Google Summer of code 2011

2011-03-22 Thread akash mehrotra
I would like to propose an additional idea for GSoC 2011. This is a very abstract proposal, as I have not yet used GNUCash or seen the source, so I do not know if its practical to implement it. Please do tell me if its practical, I will expand upon it: A mobile application(QT can be used if

Re: 2.4 branch created (Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now)

2011-03-21 Thread Stephen Brown
Hi Derek, Geert & Christian At the moment I am successfully building under Microsoft Vista whatever the install.sh build scripts build, which If I understand what is being said in this thread correctly is the stable version. I want to develope on the developement version. Yours Sincerely Stephe

Re: 2.4 branch created (Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now)

2011-03-21 Thread Derek Atkins
Geert Janssens writes: > Yay ! > > I'm a bit busy right now, but later this week I'll push some of the > developments I have been working on (guile 1.8, gnome-druid replacement,...). A couple to-dos: 1) Make the 2.4 branch win32 build scripts build from the 2.4 branch instead of trunk. 2)

Re: 2.4 branch created (Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now)

2011-03-21 Thread Geert Janssens
On zondag 20 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote: > Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens: > > On zaterdag 12 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote: > > > Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens: > > > > > > I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can > > > > > >

Re: 2.4 branch created (Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now)

2011-03-20 Thread John Ralls
On Mar 20, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Christian Stimming wrote: > Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens: >> On zaterdag 12 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote: >>> Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens: >> I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can >> introd

2.4 branch created (Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now)

2011-03-20 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens: > On zaterdag 12 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote: > > Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens: > > > > > I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can > > > > > introduce several pending changes on trunk without risking t

Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now

2011-03-12 Thread Geert Janssens
On zaterdag 12 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote: > Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens: > > > > I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce > > > > several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable > > > > code state we have in 2.4.3. >

Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now

2011-03-12 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Samstag, 12. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens: > > > I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce > > > several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable > > > code state we have in 2.4.3. > > Since you proposed the branching and most people agreed, I

Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now

2011-03-12 Thread John Ralls
On Mar 12, 2011, at 1:56 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > On maandag 7 maart 2011, John Ralls wrote: >> On Mar 7, 2011, at 1:53 AM, Christian Stimming wrote: >>> Dear developers, >>> >>> I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce >>> several pending changes on trunk without

Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now

2011-03-12 Thread Geert Janssens
On maandag 7 maart 2011, John Ralls wrote: > On Mar 7, 2011, at 1:53 AM, Christian Stimming wrote: > > Dear developers, > > > > I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce > > several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable > > code state we have in 2

Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now

2011-03-09 Thread Derek Atkins
Christian Stimming writes: > Am Montag, 7. März 2011 schrieb Derek Atkins: >> >> I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce >> >> several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable >> >> code state we have in 2.4.3. >> >> >> > >> > No comments, just

Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now

2011-03-08 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Montag, 7. März 2011 schrieb Derek Atkins: > >> I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce > >> several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable > >> code state we have in 2.4.3. > >> > > > > No comments, just a +1 from me. > > I'm fine with it.

Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now

2011-03-07 Thread John Ralls
On Mar 7, 2011, at 6:43 AM, John Ralls wrote: > > On Mar 7, 2011, at 1:53 AM, Christian Stimming wrote: > >> Dear developers, >> >> I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce >> several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable code >> state we h

Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now

2011-03-07 Thread John Ralls
On Mar 7, 2011, at 1:53 AM, Christian Stimming wrote: > Dear developers, > > I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce several > pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable code state we > have in 2.4.3. > > Pending changes for trunk are: > - Requi

Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now

2011-03-07 Thread Derek Atkins
Geert Janssens writes: > On maandag 7 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote: >> Dear developers, >> >> I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce >> several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable >> code state we have in 2.4.3. >> >> Pending chang

Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now

2011-03-07 Thread Manfred Usselmann
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 10:53:55 +0100 Christian Stimming wrote: > Dear developers, > > I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can > introduce several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose > the stable code state we have in 2.4.3. > > Pending changes for trunk are: > -

Re: Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now

2011-03-07 Thread Geert Janssens
On maandag 7 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote: > Dear developers, > > I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce > several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable > code state we have in 2.4.3. > > Pending changes for trunk are: > - Requiring gu

Proposal: Branch 2.4-stable and trunk now

2011-03-07 Thread Christian Stimming
Dear developers, I propose to branch a 2.4-stable branch now, so that we can introduce several pending changes on trunk without risking to loose the stable code state we have in 2.4.3. Pending changes for trunk are: - Requiring guile-1.8 (i.e. throwing out guile-1.6 support) - Requiring gtk

Re: Python bindings enhancement proposal : Adding capability of reading namespaces

2010-12-16 Thread Christoph Holtermann
Hello ! Am 16.12.2010 15:25, schrieb Mike Evans: > > One small thing, patches should be references from the base directory not from > > src, that's to say the patch path should start with src/blah/blah/ . Things > > can get confusing if the path is not consistent. > > I'm sorry for that ! I must

Re: Python bindings enhancement proposal : Adding capability of reading namespaces

2010-12-16 Thread Mike Evans
On Wednesday 15 Dec 2010 13:16:30 Christoph Holtermann wrote: > Hello ! > > I just worked out how to access the contents of the glist returned by > comm_table.get_namespaces_list(). I added a patch to [1]. Would > you be so kind to have a look at it ? Thanks for that, commited. One small thing,

Re: Python bindings enhancement proposal : Adding capability of reading namespaces

2010-12-16 Thread Mike Evans
On Wednesday 15 Dec 2010 13:16:30 Christoph Holtermann wrote: > Hello ! > > I just worked out how to access the contents of the glist returned by > comm_table.get_namespaces_list(). I added a patch to [1]. Would > you be so kind to have a look at it ? > > regards, > > Christoph Holtermann > Th

Re: Python bindings enhancement proposal : Adding capability of reading namespaces

2010-12-15 Thread Christoph Holtermann
Hello ! I just worked out how to access the contents of the glist returned by comm_table.get_namespaces_list(). I added a patch to [1]. Would you be so kind to have a look at it ? regards, Christoph Holtermann [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636808 Am 08.12.2010 21:34, schrieb

Python bindings enhancement proposal : Adding capability of reading namespaces

2010-12-08 Thread Christoph Holtermann
Hello ! One small thing that came across me when I was extending the example script to read out the commodities [1] was, that I could not read out the names of the namespaces. I guess there has to be a modification of the interface files. comm_table.get_namespaces_list() returns a list of > and

Re: Proposal for migration from Subversion to Git.

2010-08-09 Thread Christian Stimming
Dear Tao, I'm all in for this. We might consider such changes right after the 2.4.0 release, but that isn't too far away, so discussing it now is fine. Thanks for the suggestion. IMHO git gives a significant amount of benefit over SVN, simply because the versioning system doesn't enforce any so

Re: Proposal for migration from Subversion to Git.

2010-08-07 Thread Martin Preuss
Hi, On Samstag 07 August 2010, Tao Wang wrote: [...] > I prefer move to Git for following reasons: [...] You don't have to move the whole repository: Just use "git-svn" on *your* machine (that's what I'm doing). It gives you all the features you described even though the main repository is sti

  1   2   3   4   5   >