Hi,
Ted Creedon tcree...@easystreet.net writes:
guile-config --version
guile-config - Guile version 2.0.2
This implies you are still building against Guile-2, not 1.8.
-derek
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be
On donderdag 10 november 2011, Derek Atkins wrote:
Hi,
Ted Creedon tcree...@easystreet.net writes:
guile-config --version
guile-config - Guile version 2.0.2
This implies you are still building against Guile-2, not 1.8.
Hmm, we are having a couple of conversations mixing up here
Guile 2.0.2 Derek suggested 1.8 but that creates other problems - autoconf
breaks
I've built a separate suse 12.1 RC2 clean system to verify the integrity of
the releases just in case the removal of 1.8 wasn't complete.
Ted
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Geert Janssens
janssens-ge
On donderdag 10 november 2011, Ted Creedon wrote:
Guile 2.0.2 Derek suggested 1.8 but that creates other problems - autoconf
breaks
The question will be which of the breakages will be easiest to fix though...
I've built a separate suse 12.1 RC2 clean system to verify the integrity
Self complied from srpm's including guile-devel
do you want me to set up one system w/ guile 1.8 1 with 2.0?
The 2.0 problem won't go away and I'd prefer to concentrate on 2.0.
Right now I dual boot one system to get back to an operable gnucash so I'm
in no hurry.
do you want (large) straces
remember that with 2.0 configure errors out unless
--disable-error-on-warning is used
ted
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Ted Creedon tcree...@easystreet.netwrote:
Self complied from srpm's including guile-devel
do you want me to set up one system w/ guile 1.8 1 with 2.0?
The 2.0 problem
Built a new system w. guile 2.0
export GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0
make clean;./configure --disable-error-on-warning;time nice make -s
gnucash
On Wed, Nov 9, 2izzy:/data/gnucash # rm -rf /root/.cache/guile/*;gnucash
gnc.bin-Message: main: binreloc relocation support was disabled at
configure time
Ted,
Are you sure you're using the most recent trunk?
Also, I wonder where it's finding ice-9/boot-9.scm? Are there any traces
of guile-1.8 on this system? Any traces of an old GnuCash build?
-derek
On Thu, November 10, 2011 1:37 pm, Ted Creedon wrote:
Built a new system w. guile 2.0
recent trunk?
Also, I wonder where it's finding ice-9/boot-9.scm? Are there any traces
of guile-1.8 on this system? Any traces of an old GnuCash build?
-derek
On Thu, November 10, 2011 1:37 pm, Ted Creedon wrote:
Built a new system w. guile 2.0
export GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0
make
Note that I don't have a guile 2 installed currently (and right now I don't
have time to set one up). So I'm making suggestions based on what I read about
it and interpreting the errors you send here...
What happens if you remove /root/.cache/guile/ and run again (still with
GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
On dinsdag 8 november 2011, Ted Creedon wrote:
not finding guile 1.8 is what I've observed - I can send debug info from an
strace of configure if desired
i have 2 systems one guiile 1.8 one 2.0
From which source are you starting, and where
guile-config --version
guile-config - Guile version 2.0.2
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
On dinsdag 8 november 2011, Ted Creedon wrote:
not finding guile 1.8 is what I've observed - I can send debug info
announce window tip of the day pop up before exiting
rm -rf /root/.cache/guile/;GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 gnucash --debug --extra
gnc.bin-Message: main: binreloc relocation support was disabled at
configure time.
This is a development version. It may or may not work.
Report bugs and other problems
can anyone suggest a suitable log.conf?
thanks
ted
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Ted Creedon tcree...@easystreet.net wrote:
announce window tip of the day pop up before exiting
rm -rf /root/.cache/guile/;GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 gnucash --debug --extra
gnc.bin-Message: main: binreloc
On vrijdag 13 mei 2011, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I was doing some testing with guile-2.0 and GnuCash, and encountered
the need for the following fixes to make it build.
(Note: it still doesn't *work*, but it at least builds for further
testing.)
Total changes:
configure.ac
Geert Janssens (janssens-ge...@telenet.be) said:
On vrijdag 13 mei 2011, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I was doing some testing with guile-2.0 and GnuCash, and encountered
the need for the following fixes to make it build.
(Note: it still doesn't *work*, but it at least builds for further
not finding guile 1.8 is what I've observed - I can send debug info from an
strace of configure if desired
i have 2 systems one guiile 1.8 one 2.0
ted
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Geert Janssens (janssens-ge...@telenet.be) said:
On vrijdag 13
On dinsdag 8 november 2011, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Geert Janssens (janssens-ge...@telenet.be) said:
On vrijdag 13 mei 2011, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I was doing some testing with guile-2.0 and GnuCash, and encountered
the need for the following fixes to make it build.
(Note: it still
On dinsdag 8 november 2011, Ted Creedon wrote:
not finding guile 1.8 is what I've observed - I can send debug info from an
strace of configure if desired
i have 2 systems one guiile 1.8 one 2.0
From which source are you starting, and where are guile-1.8 and guile-2.0
installed on your
On dinsdag 8 november 2011, Geert Janssens wrote:
Ted,
Please keep gnucash messages on the list.
I've forwarded this one for you.
Geert
-- Doorgestuurd bericht --
Onderwerp: 2.4.8 git /w guile 2.0
Datum: dinsdag 8 november 2011, 21:00:38
Van: Ted Creedon tcree
the switch --disable-error-on-warning is required to get a make completed
if not used then:
wig-core-utils.c:1386:7: error: 'scm_makstr' is deprecated (declared at
/usr/include/guile/2.0/libguile/deprecated.h:124)
[-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
swig-core-utils.c:1389:3: error: 'scm_must_free
. It may or may not work.
Report bugs and other problems to gnucash-devel@gnucash.org.
You can also lookup and file bug reports at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
The last stable version was GnuCash 2.4.7
The next stable version will be GnuCash 2.6
;;; note: source file
/usr/local/share/gnucash/guile
summarizing:
./configure --disable-error-on-warning produces a gnucash executable
./configure produces deprecated-declarations errors
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
On vrijdag 20 mei 2011, Mike Alexander wrote:
--On May 18, 2011 7:23:38 PM +0200 Geert Janssens
janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
On vrijdag 6 mei 2011, John Ralls wrote:
On May 6, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Daniel Kraft wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not able to build Gnucash 2.4.5 with Guile 2
--On May 18, 2011 7:23:38 PM +0200 Geert Janssens
janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
On vrijdag 6 mei 2011, John Ralls wrote:
On May 6, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Daniel Kraft wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not able to build Gnucash 2.4.5 with Guile 2 installed --
which is not too surprising, since the API
Just installed the latest build on my XP test VM and this does not start if
c:\soft\guile... is not around.
Looking back at R20597, there was a guile 1.6 entry left in
packaging/win32/gnucash.iss.in on line 322.
Had another look at this file and there are 1.6 entries on line 167 and 367
so I
On woensdag 18 mei 2011, Robert Fewell wrote:
Just installed the latest build on my XP test VM and this does not start if
c:\soft\guile... is not around.
Looking back at R20597, there was a guile 1.6 entry left in
packaging/win32/gnucash.iss.in on line 322.
Had another look at this file
I was doing some testing with guile-2.0 and GnuCash, and encountered
the need for the following fixes to make it build.
(Note: it still doesn't *work*, but it at least builds for further
testing.)
Total changes:
configure.ac| 14 --
src/import-export
-PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GUILE, [guile-1.8 = 1.8.5], , [AC_MSG_ERROR([
-
- guile does not appear to be installed correctly, or is not in the
- correct version range. Perhaps you have not installed the guile
- development packages? Gnucash requires at least version 1.8.5 to build
Dear Robert,
thank you very very much for this observation!
Am Donnerstag, 28. April 2011 schrieb Robert Fewell:
it appears to be looking in the c:\soft\guile\share\guile\1.8\
ice-9 for the missing file / files.
If I copy c:\soft\guile\.. to my test VM, gnucash starts.
Now we have to find
On vrijdag 29 april 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
Dear Robert,
thank you very very much for this observation!
Am Donnerstag, 28. April 2011 schrieb Robert Fewell:
it appears to be looking in the c:\soft\guile\share\guile\1.8\
ice-9 for the missing file / files.
If I copy c:\soft
On woensdag 27 april 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
We don't link in this library ourselves, so we shouldn't (need to) check
for it as well.
I would blame the libguile-devel packager, because due to this linker flag
the libguile-devel package should have a dependency on libtool-ltdl-devel
On dinsdag 26 april 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
I think in the wiki... but indeed, the dependencies are not well
documented. On the other hand, any form of dependency documentation gets
out of date very very quickly, so it's kind of pointless anyway.
True. And given the dependency isn't
-- Forwarded message --
From: Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be
To: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:52:30 +0200
Subject: Re: r20585 - gnucash/trunk - Replace guile configure check by
PKG_CHECK_MODULE so that it also works in cross-compiling
Am Mittwoch, 27. April 2011 schrieb J. Alex Aycinena:
Replace guile configure check by PKG_CHECK_MODULE so that it also works
in cross-compiling.
After this commit I couldn't build gnucash anymore on linux. It turns out
that pkgcheck adds a library dependency (-lltdl
On vrijdag 22 april 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
Author: cstim
Date: 2011-04-22 15:43:39 -0400 (Fri, 22 Apr 2011)
New Revision: 20585
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/20585
Removed:
gnucash/trunk/macros/gnome-guile-checks.m4
Modified:
gnucash/trunk/Makefile.am
-guile-checks.m4
Modified:
gnucash/trunk/Makefile.am
gnucash/trunk/configure.ac
Log:
Replace guile configure check by PKG_CHECK_MODULE so that it also works
in cross-compiling.
After this commit I couldn't build gnucash anymore on linux. It turns out
that pkgcheck adds
...@mcmedia.com.au
Cc: GNUCash Devel gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 7:40 AM
Subject: Re: Microsoft Vista install.sh guile config failed
This is due to Geert's commits today. Right now the build system is in
flux because it requires a different build environment for 2.4 v trunk
...@ihtfp.com
To: Stephen Brown stephengrantbr...@mcmedia.com.au
Cc: GNUCash Devel gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 7:40 AM
Subject: Re: Microsoft Vista install.sh guile config failed
This is due to Geert's commits today. Right now the build system is in
flux
Hi All,
But I just read the Christian now has broken the build by adding some
python
dependent code, while there is no python available in the Windows build
environment. So you may want to wait until he fixes this.
Would it not be better to fix this before it is committed to svn
so that the
Am Donnerstag, 24. März 2011 schrieb Stephen Brown:
Hi All,
But I just read the Christian now has broken the build by adding some
python
dependent code, while there is no python available in the Windows build
environment. So you may want to wait until he fixes this.
Would it not be
actually are all required to get the
Windows build working with guile 1.8.
* These patches have been tested and work (on my system), but are fairly
invasive, as they require a gcc update.
* This is no problem if you are only interested in the unstable branch.
* It becomes a problem if you wish
I took something for it.
From: Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be
To: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
Sent: Tue, March 22, 2011 8:05:55 AM
Subject: Unstable development, guile 1.8 and gcc 4.5.2
I had the privilege to apply the fist series of patches to trunk
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
[snip]
What do you think ? Which solution would be preferable and realistic
(in terms of effort vs gain) ?
I think it would be cool if there were some way in the 'branch' to say
what build system is required. Then we could effectively do:
-
: Phil Longstaff plongst...@rogers.com
To: Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be; gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
Sent: Tue, March 22, 2011 9:14:50 AM
Subject: Re: Unstable development, guile 1.8 and gcc 4.5.2
Geert,
you say the updated gcc can't build the stable branch on Windows. What is
the
problem
On dinsdag 22 maart 2011, Phil Longstaff wrote:
Geert,
you say the updated gcc can't build the stable branch on Windows. What
is the problem?
guile 1.6 won't build with gcc 4.x. I don't remember the exact details, but I
do remember I couldn't figure out how to fix this after several
Sent: Tue, March 22, 2011 9:38:54 AM
Subject: Re: Unstable development, guile 1.8 and gcc 4.5.2
On dinsdag 22 maart 2011, Phil Longstaff wrote:
Geert,
you say the updated gcc can't build the stable branch on Windows. What
is the problem?
guile 1.6 won't build with gcc 4.x. I don't remember
Thanks Geert for the patches and the exhaustive explanation. I'm out of town
and will reply in detail later. But I think we shouldn't waste any effort on
the building that isn't absolutely necessary. I'd say we set up a second VM
with the gcc4 build for trunk, and use the existing one for 2.4
On dinsdag 22 maart 2011, Derek Atkins wrote:
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
[snip]
What do you think ? Which solution would be preferable and realistic
(in terms of effort vs gain) ?
I think it would be cool if there were some way in the 'branch' to say
what build
Hi All,
You probably know this already but on svn 20446
checking for guile - 1.8.5 = version 99.99.99... no: 1.6.8
configure: WARNING: guile version check failed
configure: error:
guile does
Am Montag, 21. März 2011 schrieb Stephen Brown:
Hi All,
You probably know this already but on svn 20446
---
- checking for guile - 1.8.5 = version 99.99.99...
no: 1.6.8
configure: WARNING: guile
will no longer be able to build 2.4
-derek
On Mon, March 21, 2011 3:58 pm, Stephen Brown wrote:
Hi All,
You probably know this already but on svn 20446
checking for guile - 1.8.5 = version 99.99.99
When distributions start to ship this, will GnuCash just work or
will there be problems? (Probably a rhetorical question ...)
http://lwn.net/Articles/428288/
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
Oh, and GTK+ 3.0.0 as well:
http://lwn.net/Articles/427458/
Interesting times for developers.
On 17.02.2011 11:20, Herbert Thoma wrote:
When distributions start to ship this, will GnuCash just work or
will there be problems? (Probably a rhetorical question ...)
http://lwn.net/Articles/428288/
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
There will be (known) problems with GnuCash as it is now. Andy Wingo did
provide us with some patches to fix that [1]. The problem with those patches
is that they are not compatible with guile 1.6, which we still
On donderdag 17 februari 2011, Herbert Thoma wrote:
Oh, and GTK+ 3.0.0 as well:
http://lwn.net/Articles/427458/
Interesting times for developers.
Interesting indeed and busy also. GnuCash isn't ready yet for Gtk+ 3.0 either.
Getting it Gtk+ 3.0 compatible is on my agenda for the next major
ready yet for Gtk+ 3.0
either. Getting it Gtk+ 3.0 compatible is on my agenda for the next
major release as well.
Geert
Oh dear. Will this affect mere mortals such as I who are still running
the pre-built Gnucash 2.2.9 from the Ubuntu repos? I haven't upgraded
gtk+ and guile yet
Christian,
Christian Stimming cs...@code.gnucash.org writes:
(Yay, I made r2 :-)
Darn! I was hoping to get r2. :-P
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL:
Hi folks,
I was just trying the Aging Payables report using a current trunk
version, which triggered a few errors here. I don't think backtraces are
relevant, so just the errors:
guile-modules/gnucash/report/aging.scm:311:5: Wrong type (expecting
exact integer): #primitive-procedure QOF
Mark Jenkins m...@parit.ca writes:
I don't know if make install is supported from sub directories of the
source tree, but you can look to see if up to date installed files
really do get to the destination.
It is.. provided you haven't changed anything in other directories.
-derek
--
I´d like to know if I did things halfway correctly :
I tried
patch -i python_bindings_stability_without_guile.patch
in the gnucash directory of Rev 19255.
It did not find the file src/optional/python-bindings/gnucash_core.i. When
I told it to use
Hello !
Am 16.06.2010 17:20, schrieb Mark Jenkins:
Attached is a patch that appears to improve stability for the python
bindings.
Instead of initializing guile and using the gnucash module loading
mechanisms, I directly link to all needed modules and just use the
direct initialization
On Sunday 27 June 2010, Christoph Holtermann wrote:
Hello !
Am 16.06.2010 17:20, schrieb Mark Jenkins:
Attached is a patch that appears to improve stability for the python
bindings.
Instead of initializing guile and using the gnucash module loading
mechanisms, I directly link to all
Attached is a patch that appears to improve stability for the python
bindings.
Instead of initializing guile and using the gnucash module loading
mechanisms, I directly link to all needed modules and just use the
direct initialization functions in pretty much the same way that
Cutecash does
won't help us here.
On Wednesday 2 June 2010, Derek Atkins wrote:
HOWEVER, note that this will invalidate all existing check formats! So
it's a non-backwards-compatible interface format.
Is there some way we can get guile not to #include windows includes?
I explored this option a little
guile not to #include windows includes?
I explored this option a little deeper. It looks like I can indeed avoid
the windows includes by patching one of the guile headers.
I'm still waiting for the build to finish to see if it worked, but so far
guile was compiled successfully
-backwards-compatible interface format.
Is there some way we can get guile not to #include windows includes?
I explored this option a little deeper. It looks like I can indeed avoid
the windows includes by patching one of the guile headers.
I'm still waiting for the build to finish to see
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
Ok, the windows includes are out it seems.
But guile seems to export functions that use types defined in gmp.h (mpz_
stuff).
Guile linux has the same dependency and on linux the gmp.h header file is
available. But only because guile
Zitat von Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be:
Most of these are easily solved. But I hit this one now and I'm not sure how
to proceed.
src/gnome/dialog-print-check.c contains this construct:
#define ENUM_CHECK_ITEM_TYPE(_) \
_(NONE,) \
_(PAYEE,) \
This is a real
On Wednesday 2 June 2010, Christian Stimming wrote:
Zitat von Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be:
Most of these are easily solved. But I hit this one now and I'm not sure
how to proceed.
src/gnome/dialog-print-check.c contains this construct:
#define ENUM_CHECK_ITEM_TYPE(_) \
On Wednesday 2 June 2010, Geert Janssens wrote:
On Wednesday 2 June 2010, Christian Stimming wrote:
Zitat von Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be:
Most of these are easily solved. But I hit this one now and I'm not
sure how to proceed.
src/gnome/dialog-print-check.c contains
Valdis Vītoliņš valdis.vitol...@odo.lv writes:
The problem for newcomer is, that Hello world report doesn't seem as an
example
but as an superset of (too much) possibilities, which is hard to
understand.
If it is _really_ simple example, it is little bit scary...
The hello-world report is a
.
== Environment ==
Ubuntu 10.04
Guile 1.8.7
GnuCash 2.3.12 r19180M
== Files ==
val...@studio:~$ cat ~/.gnucash/config.user
(load-from-path /home/valdis/Darbvirsma/Gnucash/report.scm)
val...@studio:~$ cat ~/.gnucash/log.conf
# http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Logging
[levels]
gnc=message
gnc.scm=debug
Valdis Vītoliņš valdis.vitol...@odo.lv writes:
[snip]
/opt/gnucash-svn/share/gnucash/scm/report.scm:652:35: In expression
(renderer report):
/opt/gnucash-svn/share/gnucash/scm/report.scm:652:35: Wrong type to
apply: #f
[snip]
/opt/gnucash-svn/share/gnucash/scm/report.scm:652:35: In
The problem for newcomer is, that Hello world report doesn't seem as an
example
but as an superset of (too much) possibilities, which is hard to
understand.
If it is _really_ simple example, it is little bit scary...
But anyway will learn about your suggestions tomorrow.
Valdis
Valdis Vītoliņš
Hm..
Following instruction from
http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Custom_Reports_Using_Eguile
I can invoke report from menu Reports- Business- Tax Invoice (eguile) if
running Gnucash with LANG=en_US.utf8
But it doesn't appear if I invoke Gnucash with my native lv_LV.utf8
locale.
What should I write
Jeff Kletsky gnuc...@allycomm.com writes:
gdb works well at letting me poke around in the C portions of the
code, but, not unexpectedly, doesn't seem to be able to let me do the
same for Guile.
I'm aware of (display foo) as well as (gnc:debug more-foo), but is
there a way
gdb works well at letting me poke around in the C portions of the code,
but, not unexpectedly, doesn't seem to be able to let me do the same for
Guile.
I'm aware of (display foo) as well as (gnc:debug more-foo), but is there
a way that an interactive Guile debugger can be invoked from
and have it work (which it does NOT if built in
a fresh directory)
From what I can tell, the only file different in the source tree
between (1) and (3) in this case was intl-scm/guile-strings.c
I also do not have any idea what this behavior might be caused by. But
the file intl-scm/guile
file different in the source tree
between (1) and (3) in this case was intl-scm/guile-strings.c
I also do not have any idea what this behavior might be caused by. But
the file intl-scm/guile-strings.c has clearly no implication on the
build and the resulting binaries whatsoever - instead
I've been running in circles for the last several days with a problem
that manifests itself when, from what I can tell, the code in engine.i
tries to create Guile variables using the SET_ENUM construct. The
console, in my case, reports
Backtrace:
In current input:
1: 0* (set! OPTION-SECTION
for the last several days with a problem
that manifests itself when, from what I can tell, the code in engine.i
tries to create Guile variables using the SET_ENUM construct. The
console, in my case, reports
Backtrace:
In current input:
1: 0* (set! OPTION-SECTION-ACCOUNTS (OPTION-SECTION-ACCOUNTS
Jeff Kletsky gnuc...@allycomm.com writes:
Guile 1.9.x appears to have a real profiler, if I can ever get it to
build on Ubuntu Karmic. Not unsurprisingly, I wasn't successful in my
admittedly brief efforts in getting the profiler to run with Guile
1.6.
I had searched the archives about
Guile 1.9.x appears to have a real profiler, if I can ever get it to
build on Ubuntu Karmic. Not unsurprisingly, I wasn't successful in my
admittedly brief efforts in getting the profiler to run with Guile 1.6.
I had searched the archives about Guile 1.9 or 2.0 and found very little
beyond
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
[snip]
Is the problem sufficiently solved with Christian's guile-compat.h fix ? If
not, I can look into an alternative solution.
I believe that yes, this solved the problem.
Thanks,
Regards,
Geert (who is learning every day...)
-derek
On Monday 4 January 2010, Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Montag, 4. Januar 2010 schrieb Derek Atkins:
The first compile problem with r18541 is one of many guile-1.6
functions which Geert replaced with their non-deprecated guile-1.8
counterparts, such as SCM_NFALSEP - scm_is_true. But even
Hi,
Kenneth Wolcott kennethwolc...@gmail.com writes:
Why not just use the distro's gnucash package?
* All recent versions of Fedora have 2.2.9: yum install gnucash
* In CentOS you can get gnucash from EPEL
* In Debian/Ubuntu there's a 2.2.9 on launchpad, or you can pull all
the build
Kenneth Wolcott (kennethwolc...@gmail.com) said:
No, it was an rpm :-) Not that bad about mixing tarballs and rpms :-)
how to uninstall the rpm? sudo yum remove gnucash?
How to install EPEL?
sudo yum install EPEL
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached
Hi,
Kenneth Wolcott kennethwolc...@gmail.com writes:
Thanks for your response.
1. I did not have guile-devel installed.
2. I do now.
3. Got further. Ran into errors with SLIB.
4. Followed the advice in both the bugid's provided (installed Slib
and created a symlink); problem persists
Hi Derek;
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 09:47, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
Hi,
Kenneth Wolcott kennethwolc...@gmail.com writes:
checking whether guile works... no
configure: WARNING: Can not find Guile on this system
checking for guile... /usr/bin/guile
checking for guile - 1.6.0
Hi Derek;
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 05:57, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
Hi,
Kenneth Wolcott kennethwolc...@gmail.com writes:
Thanks for your response.
1. I did not have guile-devel installed.
2. I do now.
3. Got further. Ran into errors with SLIB.
4. Followed the advice in both
Hi,
Kenneth Wolcott kennethwolc...@gmail.com writes:
checking whether guile works... no
configure: WARNING: Can not find Guile on this system
checking for guile... /usr/bin/guile
checking for guile - 1.6.0 = version 99.99.99... no:
configure: WARNING: guile version check failed
Am Montag, 4. Januar 2010 schrieb Derek Atkins:
Simon Ruggier simo...@gmail.com writes:
After doing the above, I can build successfully using Debian's
guile-1.8-dev package. I don't know anything about Guile, so I can't
comment on how this issue could or should be handled on other
Christian Stimming stimm...@tuhh.de writes:
Am Montag, 4. Januar 2010 schrieb Derek Atkins:
Simon Ruggier simo...@gmail.com writes:
After doing the above, I can build successfully using Debian's
guile-1.8-dev package. I don't know anything about Guile, so I can't
comment on how this issue
Am Montag, 4. Januar 2010 schrieb Derek Atkins:
The first compile problem with r18541 is one of many guile-1.6 functions
which Geert replaced with their non-deprecated guile-1.8 counterparts,
such as SCM_NFALSEP - scm_is_true. But even if we reverted all of that
cosmetics, the main part
Hi;
I don't know enough about configure options to encourage gnucash to
look for guile 1.8
Looks like a bug in how guile version is checked/verified...
Don't know enough (forgot what I did know!) about autoconf and friends
CentOS 5.4
gnucash 2.2.9 fails configure for guile, looking for 1.6
Marcus Wolschon mar...@wolschon.biz writes:
checking whether guile works... yes
checking for guile... /usr/bin/guile
checking for guile - 1.6.0 = version 99.99.99... no:
configure: WARNING: guile version check failed
configure: error:
guile does not appear to be installed correctly
checking whether guile works... yes
checking for guile... /usr/bin/guile
checking for guile - 1.6.0 = version 99.99.99... no:
configure: WARNING: guile version check failed
configure: error:
guile does not appear to be installed correctly, or is not in the
correct version range. Perhaps you
Hello Folks
I posted my patch for this problem several days ago, but nobody seems to
have done anything with it. Please tell me if I'm going about this
bug-fixing process wrongly.
I have now created a bug report, number 573645, for this issue. The
report includes links to a minimal Gnucash
Zitat von Chris Dennis cgden...@btinternet.com:
BTW, my posts to gnucash-devel@gnucash.org don't seem to be getting
through, only the CC's to Derek (I know because he replied).
It was OK a few days ago. Is it my email system that's failing, or
the
list's?
I have seen a number of posts by
101 - 200 of 416 matches
Mail list logo
