Re: New SX editor sometimes crashes gnucash

On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 11:40 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > I'm out of town on business this week, so I'm not really in a position to > debug right now. I'll take a look next week when I'm back. David, try after r15455. -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled;b=as

Re: new sx management always marks data file modified on open?

On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 09:24 -0500, David Reiser wrote: > It looks to me like the sx rewrite results in the data file being > marked as modified (the * shows up in the title bar) immediately upon [...] > It isn't the end of the world, but does the sx checker really have to > modify the data fi

Re: new sx management always marks data file modified on open?

On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 09:42 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 09:24 -0500, David Reiser wrote: > > It looks to me like the sx rewrite results in the data file being > > marked as modified (the * shows up in the title bar) immediately upon > [...] > > It is

Re: dense cal font size

On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 00:01 -0500, David Reiser wrote: > I just started lurking in the irc logs. I guess I should find a > client... That'd be for those of you following along at home... > But I noticed you asked about dense calendar fo

Re: RFC - SX Projection Report ; Patch - SX enable/disable

On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 22:23 -0500, Peter McAlpine wrote: > I look forward to hearing your feedback regarding the patch and > feature proposal. The patch generally looks fine. Thanks for sticking (mostly) to the coding style convention in the existing files ... even if it's often my old, silly,

Re: r15486 - gnucash/trunk/src - SX "enabled" patch from Peter McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 09:50 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > Why not store the sx:enabled flag in the SX instance KVP? Granted, I > dont think 2.0 has an SX KVP, but we could maybe fix that... Besides the fact -- as you point out -- that it doesn't solve the problem, KVP frames aren't actually data

Re: r15486 - gnucash/trunk/src - SX "enabled" patch from Peter McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 20:10 -0500, Nathan Buchanan wrote: > On 2/1/07, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > To preempt your question about "how do you tell a broken > datafile f

file versioning [WAS: Re: r15486 - gnucash/trunk/src - SX "enabled" patch from Peter McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.]

On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 11:58 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > Ideally, EVERYTHING would be "like" a KVP-frame.. But using Gobject > properties and GValue (or perhaps GNCValue, so we can define our own > GValue types)... Then we always load (and save) all properties, and > hopefully don't have to know

Re: r15486 - gnucash/trunk/src - SX "enabled" patch from Peter McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 22:24 -0500, Peter McAlpine wrote: > In this case would it be possible to partially avoid the issue by not > outputting the enabled tag if the SX is enabled (because it defaults > to true)? We shouldn't elide fields we are aware of. Explicit is better than implicit. >

Re: A couple of questions

On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 14:31 -0500, John Schmerge wrote: > I'm a developer who's been using gnucash for about six months and > really like the program... It's allowed me to really start to track some > things regarding my finances that I never thought about. Anyway, I'd > like to start helping out

Re: SX event handler behaviour (was SX Projection Report/SX enable/disable)

On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 22:54 -0500, Peter McAlpine wrote: > On 31-Jan-07, at 10:39 PM, Josh Sled wrote: > > > > '_gnc_sx_instance_event_handler' should be modified to ignore > > non-enabled SXes that it receives updates about; I've added a fixme in > > th

Re: r15499 - gnucash/trunk - Remove basically-unused qof date manipulation code better provided by GDate.

On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 14:35 -0500, David Hampton wrote: > On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 11:50 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > > Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/15499 [...] > This breaks end-of-the-month tracking that was intentionally built into > the reconciliation code. The orig

Re: Patch to README.dependencies for Mandriva 2007.0 package versions

On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 22:22 -0700, Shocky wrote: > While I was working on the autogen.sh problem I mentioned in my previous > thread, I noticed that the README.dependencies file had info for Mandriva > 2006, but not 2007, so I put it together as best I could. I wasn't sure if > the dates on the

Re: SX event handler behaviour (was SX Projection Report/SX enable/disable)

On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 01:42 -0500, Peter McAlpine wrote: > Please find the attached patch: > > - SX instance models properly handle SX update/add/remove events with/ > without enabled transactions > - New SX editors now show non-enabled transactions Looks good; r15510. It'd be great if you coul

Re: Failure in configuration for a Mac

On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 03:50 -0600, Jim-Moore wrote: > checking for pkg-config... no > checking for pkgconfig... no > configure: error: Could not find the pkg-config (or pkgconfig) > program. You need to install `pkgconfig`. :) These days, that's a pretty fundamental package ... if you don't have

FreqSpec -> Recurrence migration, SX XML version rev

Summary: The SX code is going to migrate from FreqSpec to Recurrence, which will require a datafile version revision of SXes. FreqSpec and Recurrence are really similar in capabilities, but Recurrence has one extra feature which has been desired by SX users for a while: last-weekday of the month

logging overhaul (please read)

*** Up-front apologies for the length. Please at least read the summary and the questions in the text; search for "?". Summary --- r15537 contains a major overhaul of the logging subsystem in (qof and) gnucash. In short, on the surface, you *should* only notice: - a change in the f

Re: r15537 - gnucash/trunk - Overhaul gnc/qof logging: Add default log handler that implements a "log4x"-style log level hierarchy. Correctly use G_LOG_DOMAIN, raw glib logging. Cleanup tests that ar

On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 18:46 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote: > Index: /gnucash/trunk/src/register/register-gnome/Makefile.am > === > + > +INCLUDES = -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"gnc.register.gnome\" > > > Shouldn't this be defined in the automak

Re: logging overhaul (please read)

On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 13:10 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > Quoting Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > [snip] > > The space-based indentation as per ENTER/LEAVE has been disabled. > > Before, the {in,de}dent calls were conditional on qof_log_check, but > > that no l

Re: SX not entered to Register

On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 01:19 -0500, Volker Englisch wrote: > a) Enter Values > I just build GC 2.0.4 (R15521) on FC6. I have a scheduled transaction > for a utility bill coming up. I click the "(need value)" field and > enter the amount for the transaction and then I click OK. > However, the tr

Re: logging overhaul (please read)

On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 13:41 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 13:10 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > > Quoting Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > [snip] > > > The space-based indentation as per ENTER/LEAVE has been disabled. > > > Befo

~/.gnucash/log.conf

Forwarded Message > Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:29:30 -0500 > Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/15545 [...] > Support for ~/.gnucash/log.conf, a key-value file of logging settings; see > comment-doc for qof_log_parse_log_config(...) for the file format. [...] > Modified: g

Re: Problem running svn r 15552

On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 11:02 -0700, Dave Herman wrote: > I start with: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuCash-svn]$ LANG=en_US /opt/gnucash-svn/bin/gnucash > --nofile --loglevel=6 [...] > Any suggestions on additional data to isolate problem ? "--loglevel" is currently unsupported, as per

Re: Problem running svn r 15552

On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 13:21 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > However, this shouldn't haved failed in the way you describe ... it > should have just said via dailog "The file "/path/to/--nofile" could not > be found.", but generally stayed running. Weird. Well, I fo

Re: Problem running svn r 15552

On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 12:19 -0700, Dave Herman wrote: > On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 13:21 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 11:02 -0700, Dave Herman wrote: > > > I start with: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuCash-svn]$ LANG=en_US /opt/gnucash-svn/bin

Re: Problem running svn r 15552

On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 14:42 -0700, David V Herman wrote: > Don't want to sound pickey however when I try to build r 15559 > on a FC6 x86_64 system make ends with; [...] No, not picky at all, that's indeed a problem. Fixed in r15560. -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled;b=asynchronous.o

Re: logging overhaul (please read)

On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 22:51 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote: > Am Freitag, 9. Februar 2007 18:38 schrieb Josh Sled: > > The option "--loglevel" is presently disabled; is it used enough to > > bring back, or can people just say <--log ""=whatever>? > &g

Re: logging overhaul (please read)

On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 10:25 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > Quoting Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I'll probably go with --extra in the absence of a better suggestion. > > Or --debug-menu ? I suppose --extra or --extensions or --devel-menu > or.. whatever.. would

Re: 1 question

On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 10:54 +0400, AnAs wrote: > If I want to enter a journal entry, for example: > -Rent (Debit) 10,000 > - Cash (Credit) 10,000 > How can I open the general journal? It's in the Tools menu, listed as "General Ledger"; we are aware that that's a misnomer. Wh

Re: SX not entered to Register

On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 21:10 -0500, Volker Englisch wrote: > On 02/09/2007 02:01 PM Josh Sled wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 01:19 -0500, Volker Englisch wrote: > >> a) Enter Values > >> I just build GC 2.0.4 (R15521) on FC6. I have a scheduled transaction > >&

Re: ~/.gnucash/log.conf

On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 15:18 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote: > Could you add a short overview of what you'd recommend somewhere in the wiki? > Like, http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Logging or such? I think that would be > helpful. Thank you very much. Done, at that location. I've also updated the

Re: Developing the documentation

On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 12:19 +, Leom Burke wrote: > I am planning on working on the documentation to improve it for other > new users. I have the SVN trunk for the docs but the XML does not seem > to be standardised - no tabs and the tags dont line up in any editor. > I would like to tweak the

Re: Modules and GnuCash (was: MacIntel trunk build failure)

On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 12:43 -0500, Peter McAlpine wrote: > And so I pose this question: is GnuCash to have a modular design or > not? If yes, then the modules need to be ripped apart and made to use > a strict interface. If no, then the GNCModule code should be ripped > out and everything should (g

Re: Commodities and reports

On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 17:38 -0500, John Schmerge wrote: > Also, I'm wondering if the current report rendering engine can support > anything more advanced than basic scatter-plots... Can someone provide > me a link to some info on this? I'm almost leaning towards having this > type of graphing capab

Re: Modules and GnuCash

On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 12:28 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > > Example: > > business-core > > business-core-file > > business-gnome > > business-utils > > > > Could these be merged into one "business" module? Are there any > > others that should definately be merged? > > MAYBE. I'd have to think ab

Re: Modules and GnuCash

On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 21:15 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > And these should be modules (or combined together): [...] > > gnucash/import-export/binary-import I don't think this is used, anywhere, and can go away. (I thought it was the pre-1.6, binary file import code, but that's actually in backend

Re: Current data file incompatibility of branch-2.0 vs. SVN-trunk

On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 12:40 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote: > My suggestions: > > * First of all, I would like to have a quick'n'dirty solution for us > developers who frequently swith back and forth between SVN-trunk and > branch-2.0, but still want to use the same data file. This could even b

Re: Current data file incompatibility of branch-2.0 vs. SVN-trunk

On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 09:24 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > A gconf key seems like a simple way to specify this. Probably something > generic like "apps/gnucash/development/data-file-compatability > (boolean)"? I'm already modifying the SX XML code, so I'll add it in in

Re: gnucash patch

On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 01:18 -0500, Yoshihiro Ota wrote: > I fixed the #2 problem as well. The problem is that "gtk_html_print" is > renamed to "gtk_html_print_page"; refere to > http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtkhtml/trunk/src/gtkhtml.h?r1=8386&r2=5139. Yeah, this naming change appears to be on a

Re: Google Summer of Code 2007?

On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 10:20 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > to oversee the google aspect but we would need to have the other > developers willing to mentor the students and help them along. I'd be happy to mentor. > We'd also need a list of potential projects.. The ones you suggest at

Re: Google Summer of Code 2007?

On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 12:31 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > Others that come to mind just perusing RFEs: Another nice self-contained project is a grammar-based expression parser and editor UI. The goal would be to simplify/clarify the existing (recursive descent) expression parser, but also

Re: ChangeLog

On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 20:06 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > As of 2.2 the plan is to automate the ChangeLog entries as part > of "make dist". This still wont have the per-file information you > seem to want, but I believe the format does have revision numbers > which allows for easily looking up the

Re: ChangeLog

On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 20:19 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 20:13 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 20:06 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > > > As of 2.2 the plan is to automate the ChangeLog entries as part > > > of "make dist

Re: How about plans for a 2.1.x/2.2.0 release?

On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 16:20 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote: > For that reason, I would propose unstable/beta releases as early as > mid-March, and planning for a stable 2.2.0 release in mid-May. What do > you think? I like it. I hope we can do with at only ~4 releases ... on 2-week cycles, that'

Re: r15658 - gnucash/trunk - Remove src/network-utils/, module [...]

Hopefully you intend to track trunk/ changes, but this one in particular will affect the module-cleanup branch. Forwarded Message > Author: jsled > Date: 2007-02-25 11:21:46 -0500 (Sun, 25 Feb 2007) > New Revision: 15658 > Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/15658 > > Re

Re: Google Summer of Code 2007?

On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 11:00 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > Could you add some of these to the SoC2007 page? Done. I dropped "business object list views" on second thought, because it didn't really seem like a big-enough project. Also, "accessibility review" isn't really well defined enough. If t

Re: Google Summer of Code 2007?

On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 19:36 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > I wonder if we want to add something like "Dogtail set harness" > to the list as a project for someone who wants to help write some > initial DogTail UI tests? I'd rather much of the core testable code moved out of the UI, but there's still

Re: Possible bug in the expenses system

On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 06:14 -0500, John Schmerge wrote: > I have a bunch of personal data in my books that I'm not willing to give > anyone, but am looking to solve the issue. If anyone can tell me who to > talk to about this, I'd be happy to debug the issue. > > Please email me if you're the owne

Re: SX: Created Transactions disappear from Register

On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 23:52 -0500, Volker Englisch wrote: > A new register tab is being created with the created transactions > listed. When I click on one of the transactions to change the date or > the memo all of the transactions suddenly disappear. I can reproduce; this review page is done

Re: SX: Created Transactions disappear from Register

On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 23:52 -0500, Volker Englisch wrote: > listed. When I click on one of the transactions to change the date or > the memo all of the transactions suddenly disappear. [...] > ***MEMORY-ERROR***: gnucash[17614]: GSlice: assertion failed: > sinfo->n_allocated > 0 Fixed in

Re: Drop internal copies of libgsf and goffice

On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 00:50 +0100, Andreas Köhler wrote: > I wonder whether we can remove the internal copies of libgsf-1.12.3 and > goffice-0.0.4 from trunk for GnuCash 2.2. Are there any major > distributions 2.2 targets left without packages containing libgsf-1.pc, > or goffice-1.pc and goffice

80-column width [WAS: Re: indent]

On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 23:46 -0500, David Hampton wrote: > -l80 Line width of 80. This one I find problematic. I understand the arguments for it, and have made them myself. But identifiers and type names are just too long these days. An 80-char limit can cause frequent and unnatural line-breaki

Re: indent

On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 01:17 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > I would recommend adding -ss, and I would have defaulted to -cli0, > which is also K&R, but I don't feel strongly about it. +1 on -ss . -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled;b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] signatur

Re: indent

On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 02:21 -0400, Peter Selinger wrote: > I also recommend > > -T ExampleType > > for every 'typedef', so that you get: :( We have nearly a thousand typedefs in the code some are relatively anonymous, but most aren't... I wonder if there's a way to say '-T *', or something si

Re: 80-column width

On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:00 -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > You can rail against how stupid this is, but it won't get you very far > with those of us who live this way. You can thus choose to make the > code unreadable by a large chunk of the developer community, or stick > to 80 columns. I'm not

Re: Screenshot page?

On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 13:02 +, Andreas Köhler wrote: > So what do you think? There are plenty of screenshots at > http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/browser/gnucash-docs/trunk/guide/C/figures > already, but maybe we want something special, like a shot of several > features at once or so. Anyone

Re: SX: Created Transactions not removed from SLR list

On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 18:45 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote: > It seems the transactions that are either listed to be ignored or to be > created are not cleared from the SLR list and are displayed again the > next time the SLR runs. Here it doesn't matter if the SLR is started > from the menu opti

Re: SX: Created Transactions not removed from SLR list

On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 22:42 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote: > I have the feeling just the content without the debug options will help you: > * 22:15:28 CRIT g_date_set_julian: assertion > `g_date_valid_julian (j)' failed > This also explains why - as I noticed today - a transaction scheduled > f

Re: 80-column width [WAS: Re: indent]

On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 15:46 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > Let me speak up in favor of the 80-char limit. However, I'm okay with > treating it as "strongly encouraged" rather than rigorously enforced. I think after discussion in #gnucash that we've come to consensus that the goal is an 80-column

Re: indent

On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 14:57 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote: > (If I speak for myself, I rather prefer -bl -bli0 i.e. the braces after if on > a new line, but I know this style is used only by a minority and in this case > I think the benefit of a uniform style outweighs by far the discomfort of

Re: SX: Created Transactions not removed from SLR list

On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 01:18 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote: > On 03/12/2007 11:35 PM Josh Sled wrote: > > > The weekly->daily case is unexpected, though. Would you mind isolating > > the XML for that SX and sending it over ... here or > > privately? > >

Re: SX: Created Transactions not removed from SLR list

On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 01:59 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote: > Strange thing happened: It looks like some of my transactions were > incorrectly scheduled for Jan. 1st. > For instance, I have an annual subscription to a magazine scheduled as a > reminder for Sept. 1st. This has now been included in

Re: GnuCash password features

On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 16:22 +, Mendy, Gaspard (UK - London) wrote: > I am conducting a review of some of the key applications used by our > clients at Deloitte Enterprise Risk Services, particluarly around [...] > provide me with the following information relating to the password > setting capb

Re: GObject in GC implementation Plan

On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 00:42 -0600, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > Get GObject as the base of GC's objects. With the following advantages: > - Get ref counting > - Get signals events Using GObject is a prerequisite of either of the separate "ref counting" and "signals" projects, but aren't a

Re: GObject in GC implementation Plan

On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 10:39 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > I think his point is that you can convert the engine objects to > GObjects, using the g_object_new() and g_object_unref() in place of > the current allocation/deallocation functions, but without actually > tracking references between objec

Re: Ping: Re: [patch] FIx loan druid when auto_decimal is enabled

On Tue, March 27, 2007 8:05 am, Derek Atkins wrote: > Jerry Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Derek Atkins wrote: >>> I haven't. I don't know if Josh has. Has anyone tested this patch? >>> Have you? Does it work? >> >> It works as expected for me when I test it, both with auto-decimal >> enab

Re: [Inquiry]GNUCash SoC - Implementing Undo

On Wed, March 28, 2007 11:29 am, Ariel wrote: > Actually, I'd like to turn this around - why aren't those things written > to the log? I think they should. If I invoice a customer, and then loose > data, I'd certainly like to be able to replay that. In large part because the transaction log is bas

Re: [Inquiry]GNUCash SoC - Implementing Undo

On Wed, March 28, 2007 5:37 am, Derek Atkins wrote: > But I ALSO think that there needs to be an application-wide UNDO > list, for operations that don't have a locality.. E.g. imports, > accounts/budget/business object creation, etc. > > This is clearly a VERY big problem, but how can we scope it

Re: [Inquiry]GNUCash SoC - Implementing Undo

On Wed, March 28, 2007 2:51 pm, Derek Atkins wrote: > See, I disagree. I consider a gnucash Book (set of accounts) to be the > same > as a gnumeric (or Excel, or OOo) spreadsheet/set-of-workbooks. Each > account > is akin is a single workbook, but it's really the set of accounts (and > other anci

Re: Again font size when printing (reporting system help!!!)

On Thu, March 29, 2007 5:02 am, two old wrote: > It sounds like a challenge. Is there a place where I can read some of the > discussion about the reporting system and the thoughts the dev have? I think the IRC logs contain some of that, though we've not talked about it formally much. Over the yea

Re: New reporting system (Re: Again font size when printing)

On Thu, March 29, 2007 3:16 pm, two old wrote: > First I agree a script should output content to a HTML template. The > template would secure the way my invoices or reports look on every update > of GnuCash or even an update of the script. There's a separate set of concerns about customizing repor

Re: New reporting system

On Fri, March 30, 2007 2:53 pm, two old wrote: > if custom script exist -> execute ([user dir]/script) > else use standard script. > > if custom template exist -> use it ([user dir]/template) > else use standard template It's simpler to always just have the user create a custom report, which is a

gconf errors with r15774

I'm seeing the attached gconf-related criticals after `svn up`ing to 15774 and `make install`ing. I also get the "Cannot find default values" dialog on startup. -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled;b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [~/stuff/proj/gnucash/src-t

Re: gconf errors with r15774

On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 19:57 -0400, David Hampton wrote: > I see no such errors. Can you use gdb to see what directory name gconf > is complaining about? I should have done this before reporting, but after touching files in and , the problem has gone away. -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ -

Re: r15777 - gnucash/trunk/src/gnome - Bug#343795: Be explicit about number of months so auto-decimal-point doesn't bite us. Patch from Jerry Quinn .

On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 07:44 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Should this be slated for backport to 2.0? It can be. Please review. -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled;b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part __

Re: GObject in GC: A new Library

On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 23:26 -0700, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > Of course, reach this state in the current GC implementation will take > a lot of time and code. That's way I'm considering to create a pure > GObject library that wraps the actual one. I can't see how another layer of abstraction will r

Re: GObjectification status

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 23:34 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Take a look at the gobject-engine-dev-warlord branch. I'd > like to merge this back into trunk this weekend unless I > hear objections. No objection here; this looks good. -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled;b=asynchronous.org;

Re: SX: Created Transactions not removed from SLR list

On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 10:55 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote: > Looking through my list of scheduled transactions it appears that all of > these transactions that were incorrectly set to January 1st were > originally entered to be scheduled annually. Since the option to > schedule a transaction a

Re: umlauts in online help

On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 15:14 +0200, Sebastian Menge wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 10.04.2007, 08:59 -0400 schrieb Derek Atkins: > > Oh, it's probably a UTF vs. ISO issue. > > Which URL are you reaching? > > http://www.gnucash.org/docs/v2.0/de_DE/gnucash-help/help.html > http://www.gnucash.org/docs/v2.0

[Fwd: Re: umlauts in online help]

Hey Linas... I can't seem to use .htaccess files in the website to control the Content-Type of the served content. Can you please modify the server-wide config to return UTF-8 as a default, rather than ISO-8859-1? Thanks... Forwarded Message > From: Josh Sled

Re: [Fwd: Re: umlauts in online help]

On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 12:04 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:39:13AM -0400, Josh Sled wrote: > > Hey Linas... > > > > I can't seem to use .htaccess files in the website to control the > > Content-Type of the served content. > > H

Re: SX: Created Transactions not removed from SLR list

On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:56 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote: > I've tried an older data file but saw the same problem. However, the > file may not have been old enough. I'll go searching on my backups to > find a file that's definitely old enough and try again as soon as I have > a little more t

Re: GObject in GC implementation Plan

On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 09:24 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > "Daniel Espinosa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have some ideas, to add this feature: > > > > - Add a GdaDataModel interface to QofCollection object > > - Try to create a GdaServerProvider for the actual XML file > > - Create a wrapper li

Re: GObject in GC implementation Plan

On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 18:27 -0500, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > See other projects use Anjuta to create GObject templates, and you'll > see what I mean. Daniel, you continue to indicate that you believe that we don't understand what a "proper" gobject looks like. Evidence that we do can be found in:

Re: GObject in GC implementation Plan

On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 17:42 -0500, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > 2007/4/12, David Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 14:06 -0500, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > > > I can understand why you feel that; the reason is that I don't think > > > that convert QOF to GObject will be a good idea be

Re: GObject in GC implementation Plan

On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 12:04 -0500, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > I insist to wrap QOF and step by step migrate QOF into a new pure > GObject implementation (move the code from QOF to the new) I still don't think adding another layer will help, and in fact I think it will make the process harder. It's

Re: ChangeLog policy needed (was: Release problems)

On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 12:58 +0200, Christian Stimming wrote: > http://lists.gnucash.org/logs/2007-02-01.html#T09:21:30 ; however, the manual > ChangeLog contains some (very few!) texts that do not appear in the > auto-generated one. For that reason the IRC discussion ended with no result > and w

bug day, string freeze

In #gnucash yesterday, hampton made an excellent suggestion that we should work to reduce the number of open bugs before the string freeze. Not necessarily related, but I think it would be interesting to have a proper Bug Day early-ish in the release schedule. As per the schedule at

Re: SX: SLR Problem when changing instance state

On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 17:06 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote: > When I'm running Since Last Run (GC r15872 on FC5) the split description > changes every time I change the instance state. Please see the snapshot Ick. Should be fixed in 15899. Thanks! -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsle

Re: SX: Created Transactions not removed from SLR list

On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 00:05 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote: > /home/venglisc/g2-test/test1.8.gc:199386: namespace error : Namespace > prefix fs on day is not defined > 20 I've seen this as well on 1.8 files without namespace decls. I'm not quite sure what happened – if anything – with th

Re: GNUcash Tango icon

On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 22:42 +0100, Hylke Bons wrote: > of the current gnucash icons). So if you like them, they can be used in > the next release of GNUcash under any free license you'd like. Hope you > like the icons and keep up the good work! This is very nice. I've added these to the source tr

Re: calendar proposal WAS: 2.1.0 Release

On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 22:32 -0400, Nathan Buchanan wrote: > Thoughts? Objections? Suggestions? If this seems like a good idea, I'd like > to work with everyone who sets the release schedule to get this going. I don't know why spreading the information out more is going to help. Please follow the

Re: bug day, string freeze

On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 19:00 +0200, Christian Stimming wrote: > Am Sonntag, 15. April 2007 17:48 schrieb Josh Sled: > > - pushing the string freeze out to the 2.1.2 release of May 12th. > > > > - scheduling two bug days, off-schedule with the releases. > > Specifica

Re: bug day, string freeze

On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 11:30 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > >> - scheduling two bug days, off-schedule with the releases. > >> Specifically, on: > >> - Sat Apr 21 > >> - Sat May 5 > >> > >> Thoughts? > > I'm not sure I have much time on these two days, but I think it's > a good idea. I'm think

Bug Day: Sat, Apr 21, 1500-2200 UTC

This Saturday, April 21st, we're going to have the first GnuCash Bug Day. Of course, you're welcome to help triage, find, file and even resolve bugs at any point, but this Saturday we're going to focus on this explicitly, and would like your time and support to do so. The primary things to do thi

Re: SX: Created Transactions not removed from SLR list

On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 13:48 -0400, Josh Sled wrote: > > it did open the data file but all of my transactions scheduled annually > > were converted to a January date. The day of the month is correct [...] > Ah, yeah, I see now... I broke this. I was trying to be crafty. :( >

Re: Welcome to our 2007 Google Summer of Code Students

On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 22:24 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Let me be the first to congratulate you on being selected. Welcome and congrats! :) -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled;b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: SX: Created Transactions not removed from SLR list

On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 00:47 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote: > When I enter a value for a scheduled transaction the transaction is > being created in the register (and in the review register) but both > splits are empty: This is fixed in r15940. Also, clicking OK in the SX editor no longer results

Re: Bug Day: Sat, Apr 21, 1500-2200 UTC

On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 18:17 -0400, Josh Sled wrote: > This Saturday, April 21st, we're going to have the first GnuCash Bug > Day. Thanks to the devs; it seemed that we had a bit more focus and a more-active-than-normal channel today. I was hoping that we'd get a bit more end

2.1.x and allow_file_incompatability

There are two places we use the gconf key /apps/gnucash/dev/allow_file_incompatibility: - Scheduled Transactions (FreqSpec->Recurrence) - ROOT Account Group I propose that we flip the default for these two immediately before the 2.1.2 release. Thus, starting with 2.1.2, files would no longer be

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >