Re: SX editor bug (?)

2002-01-29 Thread Derek Atkins
What happens if, instead of tabbing to the end, you hit the up or down arrow (or mouse-click) into another line? I found a bug in the Entry Ledger (which is based on the SplitRegister) where tabbing through a line uses a different code-path than just exiting a line in the middle via a mouse-click

General Query Framework, an updated proposal

2002-01-29 Thread Derek Atkins
Ok, here is an updated set of headers. I've flushed out the types a bit more as per your suggestions, and I've flushed out the model as well. There are now three registries: 1) core data types 2) gnucash objects' data parameters 3) gnucash objects' "parent" objects The t

SX editor bug (?)

2002-01-29 Thread Tim Wunder
Using gnucash 1.7.0 from cvs dated 1/21/02. I recently had occasion to change the amount of the SX for my weekly pay (tax law changes...). The SX has three entries: a debit to Checking, a debit to Savings and a credit from Inc Sal. When I change the amount of the debit to checking and thru th

Re: General Query Framework, a proposal

2002-01-29 Thread Dave Peticolas
On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 15:23, Derek Atkins wrote: > Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I realize that isn't list isn't comprehensive, but we > > > > should support all the basic kvp types, including int64 > > > > and double. Also, boolean would be good, too. > > > > > > True, bu

Re: General Query Framework, a proposal

2002-01-29 Thread Derek Atkins
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I realize that isn't list isn't comprehensive, but we > > > should support all the basic kvp types, including int64 > > > and double. Also, boolean would be good, too. > > > > True, but this list is "comprehensive" in that it covers everything > >

Re: General Query Framework, a proposal

2002-01-29 Thread Dave Peticolas
On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 08:15, Derek Atkins wrote: > Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Thanks, this looks like a great start. > > Thanks. > > [snip] > > I realize that isn't list isn't comprehensive, but we > > should support all the basic kvp types, including int64 > > and double.

Re: General Query Framework, a proposal

2002-01-29 Thread Derek Atkins
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks, this looks like a great start. Thanks. [snip] > I realize that isn't list isn't comprehensive, but we > should support all the basic kvp types, including int64 > and double. Also, boolean would be good, too. True, but this list is "comprehen