Geoff,
Interesting theory and perhaps that is the source of this anomaly. I
cannot see these timestamps in the normal price database view, but I can
say that most of the price records that were involved in both reports were
probably collected online by the Finance-Quote method, usually between
Hi David
This is a longshot: I noticed that records in the Prices table have a
timestamp, see attached screenshot.
So, perhaps, you ran the report for the 31st in the morning and the
prices had an afternoon timestamp?
You could inspect your Prices and run the report at different times of
This is odd. While prices that were picked by GnuCash for the Tuesday, May
31 dated account balance sheet report were actually the last prices in the
data before May 31, possibly several days earlier when there were prices
for every security actually dated May 31, the report which I created later
Geoff
thanks so much, it works perfectly for me in windows, i replaced the
AlphaVantage.pm file with the FX_Daily code
Saludos Cordiales
Murugan
From: gnucash-user
on behalf of
Geoff
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 9:48 PM
To: rsbrux ;
CAVEAT:- I am not familiar with FlatPak.
1. See 3b.
2. I personally have no idea, but discussion on the pull request you
cited says YES.
3a.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shirayu/finance-quote/9aee4b6d06da8a0e689b751d0e926160fb99d71b/lib/Finance/Quote/CurrencyRates/AlphaVantage.pm
3b.
Hi,
Just tried importing an OFX file in GC 4.12 on Linux Mint 22. The multiple
transaction selection in the Import Matcher to assign the same transfer account
to multiple transactions seems to no longer be functioning. Using the CTRl mouse
click to add to the selection appears to have been
I finally had a real test for this price source while running an account
report for May 31, 2022 in release 4.8, which I only recently adopted.
Unfortunately, it took prices from May 30 for this report, which is not
exactly as described by the title. Has this been corrected since release
4.8?
--
I use the ISO 8601 format in the num column - sorts just fine and
doesn't matter if it sorts as text or alphabetically.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601
___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription
On 9/26/22 10:35 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
The "number" column is actually treated as a number! So it is not sorted
lexically but sorted numerically. That means 090 will come before 0190.
If you have a "number" with a non-numeric piece, it will only sort up to
that non-numeric piece, so 1a and
I have installed my free AlphaVantage API key in /etc/environment, but when I
try to "Get Quotes", I get the well-known message "Unable to retrieve quotes
for these items:, CURRENCY: ...". I presume that this is due to the problem
reported on the page
Derek,
Thank you for the quick response. I was obviously missing something and I feel
like an idiot.
191774074 is larger than 092022 and would sort after!
Thank You,
Gyle McCollam
Gyle McCollam
gmccol...@live.com email
Hi,
On Mon, September 26, 2022 11:25 am, Gyle McCollam wrote:
> I would like to control the order that items are displayed in the
> register. I use the standard sort order as that has multiple sort
> criteria and the other options only show one. However, the Standard Sort
> Order shows:
>
>
I would like to control the order that items are displayed in the register. I
use the standard sort order as that has multiple sort criteria and the other
options only show one. However, the Standard Sort Order shows:
Keep normal order: date posted [day], number, date entered [second] [a] ,
13 matches
Mail list logo
