-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roscoe wrote:
> I imagine it's because stable is frozen. Hence only fixes will get
> in - and not new vewsions. (I maybe wrong on that.) (Naturally that
> only applies to stable..)
>
> Building and installing your own gnupg.deb from gnupg.org sources
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 11:23:08PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 11:10:23PM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
> > Not at all. Anyone who wants sigs from the GD should use that
> > keyserver. They're still available from it, and, remember,
> > expired sigs don't affect the WoT, so w
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 11:10:23PM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:28:29PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:08:24PM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
>
> > > keyserver.kjsl.com is now stripping all GD sigs. The extra variable
> > > in kd_search.c and code f
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:28:29PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:08:24PM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
> > keyserver.kjsl.com is now stripping all GD sigs. The extra variable
> > in kd_search.c and code for 'case 2:' of make_keys_elem(), respectively:
>
> It's your keyserver
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:08:24PM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 08:00:25PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:33:47AM +0200, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
>
> > > 3. Because now I was irritated, I did the same again with a different
> > > keyserver 'keyserver.k
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 08:00:25PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:33:47AM +0200, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
> > 3. Because now I was irritated, I did the same again with a different
> > keyserver 'keyserver.kjsl.com' and I got a completely different
> > result! When I fetched th
I imagine it's because stable is frozen. Hence only fixes will get in
- and not new vewsions.
(I maybe wrong on that.)
(Naturally that only applies to stable..)
Building and installing your own gnupg.deb from gnupg.org sources has
significant merits though.
(For those unfamilar its a three command
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:33:47AM +0200, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
> Am 8 Sep 2005 um 16:00 hat David Shaw geschrieben:
>
> > I'm trying, but I still can't duplicate the problem. Can you put
> > together a simple keyring and simple gpg.conf file that still shows
> > the problem?
>
> I did what you a
Am 8 Sep 2005 um 16:00 hat David Shaw geschrieben:
> I'm trying, but I still can't duplicate the problem. Can you put
> together a simple keyring and simple gpg.conf file that still shows
> the problem?
I did what you asked me to do and now I'm completely confused!
First I deleted my gpg.conf,
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:25:20AM +0200, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
> Am 7 Sep 2005 um 19:23 hat David Shaw geschrieben:
>
> > I can't seem to duplicate your problem here. Are you sure you
> > saved the result when you exited from --edit-key?
>
> As you can see, I did.
> I get the message 'already c
> "Oskar" == Oskar L
> "No Debian package for 1.4.2"
> Thu, 8 Sep 2005 20:26:10 +0300 (EEST)
Oskar> Does anyone know why there still isn't a Debian package for
Oskar> version 1.4.2 of GnuPG? http://packages.debian.org/gnupg
You can file a Debian wishlist bug report against gn
Does anyone know why there still isn't a Debian package for version 1.4.2
of GnuPG? http://packages.debian.org/gnupg
Oskar
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Am 7 Sep 2005 um 19:23 hat David Shaw geschrieben:
> I can't seem to duplicate your problem here. Are you sure you
> saved the result when you exited from --edit-key?
As you can see, I did.
I get the message 'already clean', but the sigs are still there.
In spite the output being partly in germa
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:30:39 +0200, Zeljko Vrba said:
> 1. PKCS#11
> 2. MS CAPI
> 3. vendor's proprietary API
> 4. do not support the HW at all
> Pick your poison :)
> Werner has chosen 4. for GnuPG, contrary to wishes of GnuPG users.
Not true. I simply do not have a 4758 or other tokens here.
On Thu Sep 08 2005; 16:04, Graeme Nichols wrote:
> I have just installed the latest WinPT front-end 1.0rc2 from their web
> site. I want to use my installed gpg 1.4.2 but it will not run. It produces
> an error stating that it needs gpg 1.1 or higher. It runs OK with the
The SF.net site of Win
15 matches
Mail list logo
