Hi,
one of our users run into the same error message...
Apparently this could be linked to how some versions of GPG are linked
against libcurl. See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/sks-devel/2005-08/msg00024.html
for a discussion.
In our case (pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de) an update to the latest
I downloaded gpgol-0.9.3 and tried it on my system
Windows XP Professional, Version 2002, Service Pack 2
Outlook 2002 SP3
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
I've got two problems.
1) keymanager button does not work.
(winpt.exe --keymanager worked with the gdata plugin)
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:42:52PM +0100, Michael Bienia wrote:
Michael Bienia wrote:
does signing with the OpenPGP card only work with SHA1 as digest-algo?
With SHA1 and RIPEMD160 gpg asks for the PIN but only SHA1 generates a
working signature. Trying RIPEMD160 I get:
| gpg:
I have my own CA that I use for my mail/web/openldap/etc server. I
generated a CA cert, and used this to sign a certificate for the server
daemons. All has generally gone well, until I've wanted to use
KAddressBook to grab addresses off of my LDAP server. It complains that
verification of the
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
I've got two problems.
1) keymanager button does not work.
(winpt.exe --keymanager worked with the gdata plugin)
This worked for me. Did you configure with the correct path?
2) gpgol is prompting for passphrase and then decrypting messages
properly, but is not displaying the result
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:29:51 -0800, Roger Fischer said:
I downloaded gpgol-0.9.3 and tried it on my system
Way too old. You should use the one included in the gpg4win
installer: http://www.gpg4win.org. There will very soon be a new
release which features PGP/MIME signature verification.
If
John Clizbe wrote:
Sebastian wrote:
Is there any GnuPG version which works with Windows Mobile 5.0?
No one I know who is building GnuPG for Windows systems is targeting WinCE.
Vendors of CE hardware are claiming great compliance with desktop software.
That said, have you tried the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Remco Post wrote:
since the xscale cpu found in most wm 5.0 devices is in no way
compatible with an ia32 (eg pentium) cpu, this is nonsense. There is
some effort on gnupg on wince/wm, but it is nowhere near production
ready... more like alpha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there a way to run refresh-keys WITHOUT honoring preferred keyserver
records?
Every now and then I need to update an entire keyring from one specific
keyserver, and since some of the keys involved has preferred keyserver
records it usually turns
* Henrik O A Barkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-28 22:01 +0200]:
Is there a way to run refresh-keys WITHOUT honoring preferred keyserver
records?
man gpg:
--keyserver-options parameters
[...]
honor-keyserver-url
When using --refresh-keys, if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David makes a very good point! The possibility strongly exists that an
individual has requested a /specific/ Keyserver for refreshing or
downloading their Key because they have control of their Key that way.
They may *not* wish that their Key be
Hi,
I know that gnupg-agent can allow remote use of OpenPGP keys on a
locally-connected smartcard machine to authenticate an ssh connection
from one remote machine to another. Access to the OpenPGP keys is
forwarded over the first ssh connection to the GPG agent as necessary,
without actually
13 matches
Mail list logo
