Hi Sven,
You have solved all my problems.
The two commands given by you works great!
You rock man!!!
Thanks,
-
Bhushan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Jelle de Jong wrote:
This message contains the following attachment(s):
debug-ccid-cardreader.txt
Hello everybody,
Thank you for all your work on gnupg. I got a few issues with my
smartcard system, it does not work anymore.
I attached some debug info.
Hopefully somebody can help me.
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I have what I think is a fairly simple GPG question, but the answer
seems to be alluding me no matter how much I go over the
documentation. I want to export a public key from the command line but
in minimal format with everything except th
Scott Blystone wrote:
> I have what I think is a fairly simple GPG question, but the answer
> seems to be alluding me no matter how much I go over the
> documentation. I want to export a public key from the command line but
> in minimal format with everything except the self-signatures removed.
> I
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> In reading the docs it looks as if "gpg --export-minimal ..." should
> work, but I keep getting invalid command messages. What is the proper
> syntax, please?
This is not a regular option but an argument to the export-options option:
$ g
Thanks to all. Some of these commands can be wickedly difficult!
On Jul 17, 2008, at 3:16 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
Scott Blystone wrote:
I have what I think is a fairly simple GPG question, but the answer
seems to be alluding me no matter how much I go over the
documentation. I want to export a
What you seem to be trying to execute is
gpg --export-options export-minimal
isn't it? That should work, I used it today, on GnuPG 1.4.9
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 13:23 -0400, Scott Blystone wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> All,
>
> I have what I think is a fairly simpl
I was wondering if there was (updated) work on a USB version of a
portable GNUPG that could work on any windows computer (regardless of
the administrator rights that may limit user's installing software)
and perhaps also on any GNU/LINUX PC?
I go between many different computers including my own W
A3: Please.
Q3: Should I avoid top posting on this mailing list?
A2: Because, by reversing the order of a conversation, it leaves the
reader without much context, and makes them read a message in an
unnatural order.
Q2: Why is top posting irritating?
A1: It is the practice of putting your
A4: Yes, *only* when introducing the text of a forwarded message
Q4: Is it ever OK to top post?
Werner Koch wrote:
> A3: Please.
> Q3: Should I avoid top posting on this mailing list?
>
> A2: Because, by reversing the order of a conversation, it leaves the
> reader without much context, and m
A minor vent: the problem now is the proliferation of mobile devices
which make it too difficult to not top post. Users, at this point,
are fooled into thinking this is the correct form due to the lack of a
practical alternative.
Sent from my BlackBerry...
James
On 7/17/08, John Clizbe <[EMAI
On 17 July 08, John Clizbe wrote:
> A4: Yes, *only* when introducing the text of a forwarded message
> Q4: Is it ever OK to top post?
A: Wrong, it's *never* correct, it leads only to someone, *again*, trying to
argue that somehow it's okay, and still discombobulates everything. If they
don't
On 17 July 08, James P. Howard, II wrote:
> A minor vent: the problem now is the proliferation of mobile devices
> which make it too difficult to not top post. Users, at this point,
> are fooled into thinking this is the correct form due to the lack of a
> practical alternative.
>
> Sent from my
James P. Howard, II wrote:
A minor vent: the problem now is the proliferation of mobile devices
which make it too difficult to not top post. Users, at this point,
are fooled into thinking this is the correct form due to the lack of a
practical alternative.
I think top-posting is common historic
14 matches
Mail list logo
