On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:40 PM, the dragon wrote:
> encrytion is about maintaining personal and data privacy; it's not about
> having a tool to break the law.
Reminds me of when some in the US was talking of Law Enforcement
Access Keys being incorporated into cryptographic products.
In Austral
the dragon wrote:
> And if you look at the cases reported, these are not system admins
> refusing to divulge data, or even regular people trying to protect their
> privacy - they are child molestors and wanna-be terrorists.
If I read the news report at that link, I see the following:
> The form
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:
[clip]
> http://www.securityfocus.com/news/11556
>
> Not entirely on topic, but for those using GnuPG (or other encryption
> software), you should always keep abreast of the encryption laws of your
> country.
[clip]
Has everyone seen the
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:40 AM, the dragon wrote:
>
> oops, didn't reply all...
>
> And if you look at the cases reported, these are not system admins refusing
> to divulge data, or even regular people trying to protect their privacy -
> they are child molestors and wanna-be terrorists.
>
> encr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Mearns wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:
> [clip]
>> http://www.securityfocus.com/news/11556
>>
>> Not entirely on topic, but for those using GnuPG (or other encryption
>> software), you should always keep abre
reflum,
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 17:15 +1200, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 11:45:07PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> > On Aug 7, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> >
> > >Hi, Having recently set up lenny on a new box, I copied
> > >the contents of ~/.gnupg from the old etch box to
