:
I'm sorry if this is not the right list to send this to. I'd appreciate it
if you could refer me to the right place that can deal with my problem.
I've never had problems with GNUPG 2.0.14 before. Now all of a sudden I
can't decrypt my files. I get the message: [filename] contains no value
I'm sorry if this is not the right list to send this to. I'd appreciate it
if you could refer me to the right place that can deal with my problem.
I've never had problems with GNUPG 2.0.14 before. Now all of a sudden I
can't decrypt my files. I get the message: [filename] contains no value
Jonathan Ely wrote the following on 3/20/11 8:57 AM:
It seems no matter which key server I try I encounter the alert saying
nothing can be found. This is very annoying. Does anybody know what the
problem is and how I can fix it? I can not seem to find a list of key
servers online. All I want
Ingo Klöcker wrote the following on 3/20/11 11:43 AM:
I doubt this very much because the encoding surely happens before the
signing.
Regards,
Ingo
In my post, I also indicated that there was a string --=20 between the
actual text and the signature disclaimer CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Charly Avital wrote:
Ingo Klöcker wrote the following on 3/20/11 11:43 AM:
I doubt this very much because the encoding surely happens before
the signing.
Regards,
Ingo
In my post, I also indicated that there was a string --=20 between
the actual text and
The attached .asc file causes problems? I have disabled that but still
enabled the header. Why would the .asc attachment option be there if it
causes problems?
On 20/03/2011 01:28 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Charly Avital wrote:
Ingo Klöcker wrote the following on 3/20/11
On 21/03/11 5:11 AM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
The attached .asc file causes problems? I have disabled that but
still enabled the header. Why would the .asc attachment option be
there if it causes problems?
The .asc file is the GPG signature and does not cause problems. The
signature that is
Firstly, what is MUA? I hear that but am not sure what that means.
Secondly, I have disabled that in Thunderbird. I had no idea it modified
anything; I thought it was simply a text signature that did not
interfere with Enigmail and GnuPG. Thanks for enabling me to understand
the complication
On 21/03/11 6:11 AM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
Firstly, what is MUA? I hear that but am not sure what that means.
MUA = Mail User Agent, e.g. Thunderbird, Outlook, Apple Mail, etc.
MTA = Mail Transfer Agent, e.g. Sendmail, Postfix, Exchange, etc.
Secondly, I have disabled that in Thunderbird. I had
we are supposed to be on 2.0.17
if the user sent data and didn't click the PGP/MIME option this could be
trouble
if you don't have the key for the sender this will be trouble
check in Kleo/config, make sure you have the right keyserver. i think
it should be
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
if you
On 03/20/2011 15:50, Jonathan Ely wrote:
Just to let you know, your signature failed to validate and thus says
‘bad’. Hope this helps.
YES!! Thanks x 100!!
== I have UPLOADED my Public key to the hkp://keys.gnupg.net server
let's see if this one goes OK!! I really appreciate the come-back we
I do not use the Gmail interface any more; I only use the Thunderbird
client and typed the signature in the edit field found in the Tools |
Account options | General dialogue. It always appears in the body, right
under the point where I type. If this is the case it should not
interfere with
On 21/03/11 6:48 AM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
I do not use the Gmail interface any more; I only use the
Thunderbird client and typed the signature in the edit field found
in the Tools | Account options | General dialogue. It always appears
in the body, right under the point where I type. If this
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Jonathan Ely wrote:
On 20/03/2011 03:35 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
To be sure that a text signature is appended without interfering
with the digital signature, it should appear in the body of the
message when you edit it. Thunderbird is quite capable of doing
this
On 03/20/2011 15:50, Jonathan Ely wrote:
Just to let you know, your signature failed to validate and thus says
'bad'. Hope this helps.
added note: when i received your message THUNDERBIRD reported
Unverified signature. I selected the option to load your key from the
server (
On 03/20/2011 04:31 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 21/03/11 6:48 AM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
I do not use the Gmail interface any more; I only use the
Thunderbird client and typed the signature in the edit field found
in the Tools | Account options | General dialogue. It always appears
in the body,
Really? For me, it is much easier to access the newest reply instead of
using the Down Arrow key to find it. Gmail always worked the same way
for me.
On 20/03/2011 04:44 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Jonathan Ely wrote:
On 20/03/2011 03:35 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
To be sure
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 21/03/11 5:11 AM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
The attached .asc file causes problems? I have disabled that but
still enabled the header. Why would the .asc attachment option be
there if it causes problems?
The .asc file is the GPG signature and
Hi,
* Jonathan Ely thaj...@gmail.com [110320 22:18,
mID 4d866ead.9080...@gmail.com]:
Really? For me, it is much easier to access the newest reply instead of
using the Down Arrow key to find it. Gmail always worked the same way
for me.
You might want to read [1,2,3].
[1]
On 21/03/11 8:16 AM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
Really? For me, it is much easier to access the newest reply instead of
using the Down Arrow key to find it. Gmail always worked the same way
for me.
It does make it easier to follow a conversation in context if multiple
sections of a conversation are
On 03/20/2011 17:19, Jonathan Ely wrote:
It can be complicated; it is for me since I am still new to this. I only
‘trust fully’ those keys who come from people who I think would not fake
identity, or have no reason not to be trusted fully. Is it unwise to
trust anybody's key fully even if you
On 03/20/2011 05:16 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
Really? For me, it is much easier to access the newest reply instead of
using the Down Arrow key to find it. Gmail always worked the same way
for me.
Ingo's talking about the body of the message. Most mailing lists people
reply after the question,
On 03/20/2011 05:29 PM, Mike Acker wrote:
On 03/20/2011 17:19, Jonathan Ely wrote:
It can be complicated; it is for me since I am still new to this. I only
‘trust fully’ those keys who come from people who I think would not fake
identity, or have no reason not to be trusted fully. Is it unwise
Something to think about that one. I guess I will experiment in the
future, but I understand what you mean and you do have a point with the
question answer order rather than the reverse. Now I understand why
Thunderbird has that option.
On 20/03/2011 05:35 PM, Grant Olson wrote:
On 03/20/2011
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 20 March 2011 at 6:31:49 PM, in
mid:4d864815.6020...@adversary.org, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 20/03/11 1:52 PM, MFPA wrote:
Whether on a keyserver or on your local keyring, I see
little difference.
Which just shows how your use
we are supposed to be on 2.0.17
if the user sent data and didn't click the PGP/MIME option this could be
trouble
if you don't have the key for the sender this will be trouble
check in Kleo/config, make sure you have the right keyserver. i think
it should be
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
if you
26 matches
Mail list logo
