On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
I need to check how to access the default browser. It uses the class ID
of InternetExplorer.Application to lookup IWebBrowser2.
Usually just with ShellExecute and Windows figures out the details!
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:18, old...@oldbob.co.uk said:
On my Window 7 64bit system, GnuPG 1.4.13 installed itself in c:\Program
Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG\ - the 32bit section. When I installed Gpg4win,
Yep, that is the default on English Windows systems.
the installer offered install GPG2 in that
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 06:24, ndk.cla...@gmail.com said:
First: I trust more the RNG on a card than a SW one
A card based RNG is often nothing more than a PRNG with a card specific
seed. Modern cards seem to have a real hardware RNG. Compared to
actual hardware RNGs they are very limited and
On 25/06/2013 12:53 AM, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
On 06/24/2013 06:18 PM, Bob Henson wrote:
When I ran
regsvr32 c:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG2\bin\gpgex.dll
it just caused an error, saying The module c:\program failed to load.
Make sure the binary is stored at the specified path or
On 24/06/2013 9:01 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
Now you may want to test it out. Note that I also added an About menu
which should always work, even if no UI-server is running. The
translations are not yet included in the ZIP file.
Having finally solved my problem with installation, I've been
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:18, old...@oldbob.co.uk said:
As I can't run the 32 bit version of GPGex anyway on this system, can I
not just overwrite the existing copy of gpgex.dll with the 64 bit one
and reboot?
Yes, you can. The
On 25/06/2013 9:40 AM, Josef Schneider wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:18, old...@oldbob.co.uk said:
As I can't run the 32 bit version of GPGex anyway on this system, can I
not just overwrite the existing copy of gpgex.dll with
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:38, jo...@netpage.dk said:
Usually just with ShellExecute and Windows figures out the details!
I do this way in GpgOL. However Marcus decided for soemthing different
in GpgEX. I have a dark recollection that this was due to problems with
Explorer plugins.
The problem
Il 25/06/2013 09:55, Werner Koch ha scritto:
First: I trust more the RNG on a card than a SW one
A card based RNG is often nothing more than a PRNG with a card specific
seed. Modern cards seem to have a real hardware RNG.
I'm referring to cards compatible with GlobalPlatform 2.1.1 (minimum),
I understand the OpenPGP card can hold one X.509 certificate
Can this be used in practice to run an in-house CA to sign other X.509
certificates, e.g. for small VPN setups?
Also, can the X.509 cert on the OpenPGP card be used with StrongSwan (as
a client or server cert for VPN)?
I understand the OpenPGP card can hold one X.509 certificate
Can this be used in practice to run an in-house CA to sign other X.509
certificates, e.g. for small VPN setups?
Also, can the X.509 cert on the OpenPGP card be used with StrongSwan (as
a client or server cert for VPN)?
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:43, dan...@pocock.com.au said:
I understand the OpenPGP card can hold one X.509 certificate
Actually the card does not hold any certifciate but merely the keys and
OpenPGP fingerprints of the certificates. You can very well use such a
key to create an X.509 certifciate:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:25, old...@oldbob.co.uk said:
GpgEx is now working just fine. I used to use another explorer extension
( I forget the name - I think it used to be in Gpg4win?) which stopped
being developed so it will be handy to have one again.
GpgEE. We replaced it by GpgEX because
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:40, jo...@netpage.dk said:
But if you do this, the extension won't be available in 32bit
processes! (32bit explorer.exe, file selection dialogues in 32bit
Windows 7 64 bit has no more option to use a 32 bit explorer. This the
the very reason for the 64 bit GpgEX ;-)
On 25/06/13 15:28, Werner Koch wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:43, dan...@pocock.com.au said:
I understand the OpenPGP card can hold one X.509 certificate
Actually the card does not hold any certifciate but merely the keys and
OpenPGP fingerprints of the certificates. You can very well use such
Hello, I want to transfer a subkey from one keyring to another, but I
get the following error:
gpg: key 7FABB65F: already in secret keyring
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: secret keys read: 1
gpg: secret keys unchanged: 1
Here is the command I am running:
$ gpg
On 06/25/2013 06:12 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
Hello, I want to transfer a subkey from one keyring to another, but I
get the following error:
gpg: key 7FABB65F: already in secret keyring
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: secret keys read: 1
gpg: secret keys unchanged: 1
On 25/06/2013 09:56, Bob Henson wrote:
I put it in a separate directory in the end, so I should have the best
of both worlds. I don't think I have any 32bit processes in use - but
I'm covered anyway.
If you run any 32bit programs at all (i.e. most applications) then the
system-supplied file
On 25/06/2013 14:31, Werner Koch wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:40, jo...@netpage.dk said:
But if you do this, the extension won't be available in 32bit
processes! (32bit explorer.exe, file selection dialogues in 32bit
Windows 7 64 bit has no more option to use a 32 bit explorer. This the
On 26/06/2013 03:25, Mark Rousell wrote:
On 25/06/2013 09:56, Bob Henson wrote:
I put it in a separate directory in the end, so I should have the best
of both worlds. I don't think I have any 32bit processes in use - but
I'm covered anyway.
If you run any 32bit programs at all (i.e. most
20 matches
Mail list logo