Teemu Likonen [2017-10-05 20:17:51+03] wrote:
> Werner Koch [2017-10-05 09:00:18+02] wrote:
>> I have exactly the same problem but I do it anwyat - there is not
>> much we can do about it. The default timeout for such lookups are 2
>> seconds. You can lower this to one second using
>>
>> connect
>>> The observation that one, some, many, or all people use a
>>> linguistic construct in an incorrect way do not change the fact
>>> that it is incorrect.
>
>> It quite definitely does.
>
> This is silly. I am flabbergasted at this assertion.
Great: you learned something today! Read up on ling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/12/17 18:50, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> The observation that one, some, many, or all people use a
>> linguistic construct in an incorrect way do not change the fact
>> that it is incorrect.
>
> It quite definitely does.
This is silly. I am fl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tuesday 10 October 2017 at 8:30:40 PM, in
, Mario Castelán
Castro wrote:-
> Would it be
> correct to refer to
> a car as an “engine”, because it includes an engine?
It is usual in and around London to call a car a "motor".
Calling it an "eng
> The observation that one, some, many, or all people use a linguistic
> construct in an incorrect way do not change the fact that it is
> incorrect.
It quite definitely does. Unlike, say, French or Icelandic, where
there's an actual institution charged with the development of the
language, the *
Despite the bulk of your message, the only attempt at an argument is
“English is an evolving language”. The rest is completely irrelevant.
That English is a changing language is not a justification to misuse
words. The word “Linux” meant a kernel when it was introduced to
informatics and it still
> The bulk of people use "Linux" to mean both terms, in casual and formal
> speech and writing. You may as well try and insist we use "United
> States of America" all the time instead of "America"; context alone
> typically implies the intended meaning.
It's tempting, but unfair, to call these p
On 12/10/17 11:09, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 12/10/17 09:13, Werner Koch wrote:
>> And while you are already at it, you better
>> also update to gpg 2.2.1. There are just too many fixes and changes we
>> did since January 2016.
>
> I think Vedaal is just using the gnupg2 package provided by Ubun
Hi Mario,
> > You snipped the bit where I said "Linux" has two meanings in the
> > English language depending on context.
>
> In the previous message you said “"Linux" can be the kernel or a
> distro.”.
"Linux" can be the kernel or a distro. Context makes this clear in
the majority of ca
On 12/10/17 09:13, Werner Koch wrote:
> And while you are already at it, you better
> also update to gpg 2.2.1. There are just too many fixes and changes we
> did since January 2016.
I think Vedaal is just using the gnupg2 package provided by Ubuntu 16.04
LTS:
https://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 09:12, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
> Somehow, this cert got introduced into my keyring twice. I don't know
I assume you are hit by https://dev.gnupg.org/T3446 most likey because
you used auto-key-retrieve with Enigmail.
> There appears to be a bug in the keybox code; unfortun
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 20:56, ved...@nym.hush.com said:
> londo@londo-earth-trinket:~$ gpg2 --verbose --verbose --version
> gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.11
> libgcrypt 1.6.5
>
> Should I get the new Libcrypt?
Yes, you should get 1.7. And while you are already at it, you better
also update to gpg 2.2.1. There a
12 matches
Mail list logo