-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 01.01.2015 um 18:10 schrieb Linux Debian:
(...)
I've updated my GnuPG key and send to keyservers. What I updated ?
I've just deleted 2 expired subkeys and added one with a longer
(in 2015) expiration. But (...) those 2 expired subkeys still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
David,
it is not a gpg2 problem and it is also not relatd to modern versions
of your mail programmes. In my case Thunderbird 31.2 with
Enigmail 1.7 runs just fine with GnuPG 1.4.16. I also have GnuPG
2.0.22 installed as gpg2, but I'm not actively
the secret key for
user: Gabriel Niebler gabriel.nieb...@gmail.com
2048-bit RSA key, ID 0x65A3F1CC8303C0EC, created 2014-03-16
(subkey on main key ID 0xD05AF6C786CB34F4)
gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit RSA key, ID 0x65A3F1CC8303C0EC, created
2014-03-16
Gabriel Niebler gabriel.nieb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear David,
On 14. November 2014 18:30:19 MEZ, da...@gbenet.com da...@gbenet.com wrote:
On 14/11/14 13:38, Gabriel Niebler wrote:
(...)
(...) maybe you can walk
us through exactly what you did and we'll see if we can't figure out
what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I'm sorry, I know this is OT for the list, but...
Am 21.08.2014 um 15:54 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
GNU community members and collaborators have discovered
threatening details about a five-country government surveillance
program codenamed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 24.06.2014 09:36, schrieb Cpp:
I was going to create a new PGP key myself by following that
article. Werner, do you have any more input or comments to add
regarding that article? I am curious to hear input from multiple
sources/people.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
A key on my keyring is valid if it is not expired or revoked.
It is authentic if it bears one signature from one of my keys,
or several signatures from other keys to which I have granted
marginal authority to authenticate keys.
I can see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 24.04.2014 11:13, schrieb Peter Lebbing:
I think authenticity covers the overtones much better than
validity, now that you mention it. It even makes me wonder why it
wasn't chosen in the first place :). You have convinced me that it
is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Peter Lebbing has thankfully pointed out that, out of my two
suggestions, authenticity is the word that should be preferred.
I agree with him on this, so I shall use that word here.
A key on my keyring is valid if it is not expired or revoked and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 25.04.2014 00:22, schrieb Doug Barton:
Isn't what you're talking about verification?
To my mind, verification is the _process_ whereby the _properties_
like validity and authenticity are established*. I see a
difference there, but one could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tl;dr: validity is confusing, please consider using ownership or
authenticity for same concept.
Dear all,
it seems to me that the problem here is mainly one of semantics. The
technical concepts are clear to everyone involved, the question is how
to
11 matches
Mail list logo
